RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 4 (1193 new emails)

Heh... if you search "welcome back" you'll spot Podesta in febuary still calling WJC "president Clinton" x)

If you search for "Weekly Update on Pending Legislation to Change Presidential Primary Dates".
It's dated march 23 2015. Podesta asks Marc Elias if they have any other problem states than Michigan in regards to the electroal votes reform question. But at this time, Clinton still hadn't announced her candidacy.

And already around march 16 2015, Marissa Astor was setting up fundraising planning between Podesta and other leading characters.


In august 2015 Brent Budowsky (Huffington Post) in a mail exchange with Podesta writes at the end of a long piece of advice with references to JFK:

"In other words, she should stop acting like a front-runner who cautiously > tries to exploit the rules of a rigged game to her advantage, and start > acting like a fighting > underdog who will fight on behalf of Americans who want a higher standard > of living > for themselves, a higher standard of politics for the nation, and a higher > level of > economic opportunity and social justice for everyone."

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
a reply to: kruphix

Your strategy will not work here.

You have been exposed.

Keep trying to correct the record.

Currently, there is nothing to correct.

You guys are making my job easy.

At least you admit it is your job to "CTR".

a reply to: DJW001

The Catholic Church has suffered from centuries of mismanagement; if it doesn't change (and fortunately Francis seems headed that way) it will die out everywhere but the Third World. How does any of this take Clinton down?

Martin Luther took care of those problems back in 1517.
Why would Hillary waste her time trying to reinvent the Reformation.
Being a Catholic is completely voluntary . Even the Pope can quit being Catholic if he wants.

a reply to: butcherguy

Martin Luther took care of those problems back in 1517.

Yep, no problems in the priesthood nowadays. It's really easy to fill vacancies in the parishes with all those young ordained women.

originally posted by: Maverick1
Thanks to you guys keeping ATS in the loop on this.

Talk about death by a thousand tiny pin pricks, this woman has passed 'dirty' and slid down to gutter-level filthy.

Meanwhile, where in the hell is the established media???

They are in the tank for her. There will be nothing bad happening anywhere in the world or bad for Hillary from now on out. All the negative news will hit us on Nov. 9.

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Bill sexually assaulted his 3rd cousin when she was babysitting Chelsea. Oh my,,even family members weren't safe from this creep.
I wonder how old she was at the time.

Yes, but remember ... words speak louder than actions and we don't have him talking dirty on a tape so as far as the left is concerned, it never happened.

originally posted by: butcherguy
Wow. I just read one where Hillary's people were talking about 'needing a Catholic Spring' . They were wondering how 'to plant the seeds of revolution' in the Catholic Church.


So much for separation of church and state in a Hillary Administration!

They already have the Pope. You would think that would be enough.

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
Wow.
Medicare helped fund Hillary's campaign in a circuitous route.

You know what that means ... We ALL helped fund her via our taxes.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: butcherguy

Martin Luther took care of those problems back in 1517.

Yep, no problems in the priesthood nowadays. It's really easy to fill vacancies in the parishes with all those young ordained women.

Plenty of openings for women pastors in Protestant churches.
Are you Catholic?
Why do you care about the people that choose to make up the Catholic Church by their own choice?

Why do you want to change them?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: butcherguy

Martin Luther took care of those problems back in 1517.

Yep, no problems in the priesthood nowadays. It's really easy to fill vacancies in the parishes with all those young ordained women.

This is the problem with people like you who think they know better for everyone else.

You think that the Catholic Church ought to be run a certain way, so you see nothing wrong with people colluding to attempt to force it to run to their will because that will happens to align with your own.

But who appointed you arbitor of the Catholic Church? Why do you care how they choose to run their church? If you don't like it, there are plenty of other denominations to choose from and many of them do ordain women ... heck, some even recognize gay marriage. I'm sure you can pretty much pick your poison so to speak.

So why do you think every denomination must conform to you?

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: butcherguy

Martin Luther took care of those problems back in 1517.

Yep, no problems in the priesthood nowadays. It's really easy to fill vacancies in the parishes with all those young ordained women.

This is the problem with people like you who think they know better for everyone else.

You think that the Catholic Church ought to be run a certain way, so you see nothing wrong with people colluding to attempt to force it to run to their will because that will happens to align with your own.

But who appointed you arbitor of the Catholic Church? Why do you care how they choose to run their church? If you don't like it, there are plenty of other denominations to choose from and many of them do ordain women ... heck, some even recognize gay marriage. I'm sure you can pretty much pick your poison so to speak.

So why do you think every denomination must conform to you?

Because it's not fair of course.

I bet all the female imans are laughing their asses off at the backward catholics.

Would somebody please explain the difference between Wikileaks and the National Security Agency, as regards the invasion of privacy. The NSA seems like the more benign agency to me. They may be spying on everyone but they don't seem to make their information public.

Wikileaks seems to me to be the sort of organization that could easily be fooled with planted or altered documents. I get that they want to expose malefactors in official places, but I don't think exposing what might be judged as embarrassing private communications, to influence an election, qualifies as crime busting.

I think what they are doing with the Podesta emails is more like the dirty tricks activities of CRP (The Committee for the Re-Election of the President), under the Nixon administration.

It's mischief, design to attract press and voter attention. To be fair, I think some, not all, of the Donald Trump sex stuff is similar, coming from the Democratic side. I guess it's that sort of election.

a reply to: ipsedixit

...attract press and voter attention.

Well, other than a few spare examples of the former, it has failed miserably and as to the latter?

Some will say that social media such as twitter and facebook give no indication of support or interest, but Twitter has blown up about the Podesta Emails. #PodestaEmails5 is currently trending, but I expect that to be shadowbanned soon.

This happened earlier:


I saw somewhere else online that someone had bricked his iPhone. I wonder what the next escalation will be?

As a little experiment (non scientific), I set up a tab to track the generic #PodestaEmails hashtag when I started this post, and as of this instant, it has been tweeted about 35 times. Make that 42.

CONFIRMATION:

John Sheridan ‏@ranger1b5 1m1 minute ago

The @wikileaks dumps of #PodestaEmails5 and earlier rounds are now verified - they contained a working user/pass for Podesta's icloud+gmail.

twitter.com...

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

The story is being given big play on CBSN. I haven't checked other outlets.

I don't want to seem too biased, unlike Wikipedia, so in the spirit of fairness, I want to include the following message from Donald Trump, urging his supporters to get out and vote.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I want everyone to notice the "Hi pol," part of the tweet.

That is a direct reference to /pol/ over on 4chan.

They've done pissed of the obsessive types but good. I think they're in for a whole new world of trolling.

If they've managed to clone what's in his icloud and get recent gmails?

Man oh man...

a reply to: ipsedixit

Explain to me the difference between Wikileaks and a whistleblower. Is it that one exposes the wrong-doings of your ideological opponents while the other just happens to be exposing the dirty laundry of those you would prefer stay hidden this time around?

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical


I saw somewhere else online that someone had bricked his iPhone. I wonder what the next escalation will be?

Well, that could bring about some interesting facts, and I think about
all of those lost laptops and blackberry's ...it could really get wild.

Anthony Weiner type of stuff...

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: IAMTAT

I want everyone to notice the "Hi pol," part of the tweet.

That is a direct reference to /pol/ over on 4chan.

They've done pissed of the obsessive types but good. I think they're in for a whole new world of trolling.

If they've managed to clone what's in his icloud and get recent gmails?

Man oh man...

I read some brief mention of Podesta having lost his phone in a cab recently.
Have you heard this?

Edit--Does this mean that 'The Russians' were the next ones to sit in the cab?

Hmmm, so is it safe to say that this is maybe why we shouldn't be trusting Hillary and the group around her with the nation's security?