If you support Trump, your career is over.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL, riiiiiiiiight.

Stunning response.

Breathtaking, as usual.

As to your next bit ... is there any law against firing an employee that doesn't follow directions?

I could be wrong, but I believe there's a law against firing an employee due to a conflict of interest.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Indigo5

Correct.

To be specific
"And when you're a star, you can do anything.
Whatever you want. Grab them by the P****Y
You can do anything"

Do you agree with Trump?

I'd also be interested if you agree with his view of marriage? Where he boasted about trying to sleep with a married woman shortly after he was married to Melania.

He never slept with anyone, or at least there is no evidence of it. Guilty of flirting? Sure. Guilty of using lewd terms? Sure.

Is a burglar who fails to crack the safe still a burglar?

"“I did try and f--- her. She was married,”
“And I moved on her very heavily.

Alas..Les...as much as I enjoy debating with you, we both know we are arguing over a dead horse. Trump is face-down on the mat..all that remains is angry trolling by both him and his supporters...which has value too as everyone should examine carefully the forces that put him in the ring and Trump's pivot to his "unshackled" Breibart Campaign affords a very clear view of both he and his supporters without the unnecessary façade of decency.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.

Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.

Do you support Trump sexualizeing his own daughter whith Howard Stern?

www.cnn.com...

Honor and character counts in a race for the presidency. This borders on perversion. You ok with that?

More somethings out of nothing... Stern asked Trump if he could call Ivanka a POA. Obviously you've never listened to Stern. It's a guarantee he didn't mean anything by it, and Trump had appeared on his show enough to know this.

If Stern asked if he could call my daughter a piece of ass, I't put that pervert in the hospital. Trump has no honor or character. And it speaks volumes about the people that support this white trash BS.

Well, you're not Trump either. You're like most (I'd like to think) dads in America when it comes to someone talking about your kids, or family in general. However, we're not voting on Trump's past, we're voting on his policies.

No I'm not Trump. I have honor, integrity, and a sense of morals and common decency. Trump has none; you expect him to live up to what he has put up as his "policies"? He is playing you like a $5 fiddle.

The word naivete falls short of describing his followers.

Yes, I expect him to live up to his policies. If he doesn't then we end up with a Hillary Clinton anyways because her policies are the exact opposite of his. Then you'd be a happy camper, how about that.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LSU0408



What on earth are you trying to say?

Don't know how to read between the lines do you? Hes saying if anecdotal evidence works for Trump, then it works for Hillary.

LOL ... thanks for the interpretation. Glad you've taken it on yourself to mind-read for another member.

Any particular anecdotal evidence you have in mind?

The same ones you linked above about Trump (yes, those are anecdotal evidence) You're dense as a pile of bricks.

LOL ... do you think that's why I linked them? Duh.

Likely story.

You took them as the gospel and you know it.

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: Gryphon66

LOL, riiiiiiiiight.

Stunning response.

Breathtaking, as usual.

As to your next bit ... is there any law against firing an employee that doesn't follow directions?

I could be wrong, but I believe there's a law against firing an employee due to a conflict of interest.

Conflict of interest? You'd have to be more specific.

There's no law that tells a media company they cannot direct the nature and quality of the material that is published or broadcast. If there is, I'd like you to show it to me, because it's unconstitutional.

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LSU0408



What on earth are you trying to say?

Don't know how to read between the lines do you? Hes saying if anecdotal evidence works for Trump, then it works for Hillary.

LOL ... thanks for the interpretation. Glad you've taken it on yourself to mind-read for another member.

Any particular anecdotal evidence you have in mind?

The same ones you linked above about Trump (yes, those are anecdotal evidence) You're dense as a pile of bricks.

LOL ... do you think that's why I linked them? Duh.

Likely story.

You took them as the gospel and you know it.

Why not?

There's as much evidence or more than anything Trump is saying about Clinton. (Either one.)

You really should put your mind-reading abilities to better use.

Married women are 15% more Republican than single women. This is tied almost entirely to being married to Republican Men.

Church and Religion, the Military, Business, even Family values and Education have conservative ideals. How education fell off recently, and being a highly educated person is equatable to a Democrat is confusing, but that's not the point, the point is, who exactly is not part of ANY of that? It's less than depicted. Republican is a conditioned 'status' among peers, it's very rare for normal people to be apart of enough institutions for it to benefit them, and when inspecting the people that do benefit, they have ties to everything.

The conservative party is a joke, and so is the democrats, but with basic understanding of the way the Democratic Political Party operates, you realize they are only designed to operate 'damage control'. Their polices are straight forgeries from other independents. The main ideal of a Liberal is that no single party should consistently win, so that everyone can be heard, they apply this to Democrats too, they also understand the economy cannot handle their own platforms.

The definition of "Democrat" is 'an advocate or supporter of democracy', if America was a metaphorical Football Field, and the Republicans Leaders as Players, with the People, as fans, the Democrats would not being the 'opposite' team as a position, as the system is. They would be the cheerleaders. This is why it's ironic when the attention is drawn to Democrat verse Republicans, when the Ideal Democrat is a Conservative Republican that embraces Liberal values.(This is actually what Trump is! But his character has been completely assassinated.) They don't want to run the country from the start, they even know they're bad at it, they just want to endlessly critic it.

To go back to the Football Game analogy one more time, the ultimate position for Democrats would to be the third party choice. The primary issue is that Republican is a party of ideals clashing with a party advocating liberties. Until there is a 'second player' to compete with Republican Ideals, the Democratic 'critic' has simply become Monarchical a wall to prevent Monarchy itself.

Personally, I think the Republican Party splitting would be the ultimate move. You have no idea how many Democrats hold their views simply from Republican Hypocrisy and would funnel into the two new Parties.

a reply to: imjack

The definition of "Democrat" is a member of the American Democratic party.

You will find what they stand for here: 2016 The Democratic Party Platform

No need to guess or unintentionally misrepresent what Democrats stand for.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Ah ... the party of "family values" shows its true mettle ...

Watching these back-flips and contortions is almost as much fun to watch as seeing Glenn Beck promoting Hillary.

Almost.

It is stunning...If anyone had predicted the current state of the GOP 18 months ago, they would have been laughed off of ATS.

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.

Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.

Do you support Trump sexualizeing his own daughter whith Howard Stern?

www.cnn.com...

Honor and character counts in a race for the presidency. This borders on perversion. You ok with that?

More somethings out of nothing... Stern asked Trump if he could call Ivanka a POA. Obviously you've never listened to Stern. It's a guarantee he didn't mean anything by it, and Trump had appeared on his show enough to know this.

If Stern asked if he could call my daughter a piece of ass, I't put that pervert in the hospital. Trump has no honor or character. And it speaks volumes about the people that support this white trash BS.

Well, you're not Trump either. You're like most (I'd like to think) dads in America when it comes to someone talking about your kids, or family in general. However, we're not voting on Trump's past, we're voting on his policies.

No I'm not Trump. I have honor, integrity, and a sense of morals and common decency. Trump has none; you expect him to live up to what he has put up as his "policies"? He is playing you like a $5 fiddle.

The word naivete falls short of describing his followers.

Yes, I expect him to live up to his policies. If he doesn't then we end up with a Hillary Clinton anyways because her policies are the exact opposite of his. Then you'd be a happy camper, how about that.

Try and keep up. I don't know how many times I've said it but I'll say it again....

I'm not a Clinton supporter...how about that?

Is it some sort of cognitive malfunction or what. Anti Trump doesn't mean pro Clinton.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: LSU0408

I don't mind it working all ways.

What on earth are you trying to say?

That you need to remain nondiscriminatory when the Conservative owner of a business does the same thing.

As long as no laws are broken, why would I be?

Folks have the right to run their businesses as they wish in accordance with the law. Fundamental concept. (Fundamental CONSERVATIVE concept, I might add.)

Fair enough. But firing someone for being a different political ideology is a conflict of interest. However, if you're told not to talk about politics, period, then that's final and if you talk about politics, you're legally fired IMO. We can't discuss paychecks up here or we face possible termination.

All I'm saying is you can't have left wing politics being talked about on one end, and Conservative politics on the other, and fire the guys talking Conservative politics only. At least I don't think you can, legally.

Ironically, politicians that hitch their cart to Trump will have doomed careers as well. He's a rotten egg and his stench will be carried on by any politician that backs him.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: imjack

The definition of "Democrat" is a member of the American Democratic party.

You will find what they stand for here: 2016 The Democratic Party Platform

No need to guess or unintentionally misrepresent what Democrats stand for.

Oh, I guess Google, and the Dictionary are just misrepresenting words.

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: LSU0408

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Indigo5

Plus he apparently thinks that women can't tell the difference between reality and a book they are reading. His stupid meme is the same as accusing kids who play Grand Theft Auto of all being violent carjackers.

Can you tell the difference between saying and doing?

You contradicted yourself with your own analogy, because accusing Trump of being a sexual predator would be the same as accusing kids who play GTA of being violent carjackers.

Do you support Trump sexualizeing his own daughter whith Howard Stern?

www.cnn.com...

Honor and character counts in a race for the presidency. This borders on perversion. You ok with that?

More somethings out of nothing... Stern asked Trump if he could call Ivanka a POA. Obviously you've never listened to Stern. It's a guarantee he didn't mean anything by it, and Trump had appeared on his show enough to know this.

If Stern asked if he could call my daughter a piece of ass, I't put that pervert in the hospital. Trump has no honor or character. And it speaks volumes about the people that support this white trash BS.

Well, you're not Trump either. You're like most (I'd like to think) dads in America when it comes to someone talking about your kids, or family in general. However, we're not voting on Trump's past, we're voting on his policies.

No I'm not Trump. I have honor, integrity, and a sense of morals and common decency. Trump has none; you expect him to live up to what he has put up as his "policies"? He is playing you like a $5 fiddle.

The word naivete falls short of describing his followers.

Yes, I expect him to live up to his policies. If he doesn't then we end up with a Hillary Clinton anyways because her policies are the exact opposite of his. Then you'd be a happy camper, how about that.

Try and keep up. I don't know how many times I've said it but I'll say it again....

I'm not a Clinton supporter...how about that?

But you HAVE to be ... none of these arguments make sense if you aren't Olaru.

You're either with 'em or agin 'em.

/s

a reply to: imjack

See "arguing by definition" linked above. EDIT: Here you go, appeal to definition

If you want to talk about Democrats, do so.

Don't make up little sock puppets and put your words in their mouths.

And don't pretend you are talking about "generic democrats" either ... makes you look disingenuous.

a reply to: Indigo5

Is a burglar who fails to crack the safe still a burglar?

"“I did try and f--- her. She was married,”
“And I moved on her very heavily.

Alas..Les...as much as I enjoy debating with you, we both know we are arguing over a dead horse. Trump is face-down on the mat..all that remains is angry trolling by both him and his supporters...which has value too as everyone should examine carefully the forces that put him in the ring and Trump's pivot to his "unshackled" Breibart Campaign affords a very clear view of both he and his supporters without the unnecessary façade of decency.

"Is a burglar who fails to crack a safe still a burglar?" That is severe begging the question.

Yes, he used lewd terms. Guilty as charged.

As much as I enjoy debating you, the irrelevant tangents do not help us get to any truth.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: imjack

See "arguing by definition" linked above.

If you want to talk about Democrats, do so. Don't make up little sock puppets and put your words in their mouths.

Sock puppets? What the hell are you talking about?
You know me, using bias Google definitions.

Most people are literally idiots with words. It's completely possible to be a Conservative Liberal Democratic Republican. They aren't false equivalents.

I was also speaking super-generally, chill out with this 'words in peoples mouth' crap. I literally wasn't speaking for anyone, but my own opinion.

Suppress your rage Trump-dog.

a reply to: imjack

Do you have anything to say about the Democrats or what they stand for?

Or are you just talking about democrats, generically, having nothing to do with anything in particular?

Chill out yourself, dude. I'm trying to help you out here. You sound upset.

Me? I'm laughing at the screen.