How to Stop Terrorism

a reply to: intrptr

"The war on terror is fake."

I would not say its completely fake but we certainly had a hand in creating said terrorist, ISIS, Taliban and there like.

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Bluntone22
So you're saying that terrorism would end if we stopped calling muslims terrorists?

No, that's only one part of it. As I said in the OP, terrorism dies when we stop being afraid of it. Once we as a nation aren't afraid of terrorism, their power over us is gone.

The war on terror is fake. The terrs are paid mercs doing the bidding of the west that wants to make Assad go, i.e., make one more regime change to one more Middle Eastern country.

Once you know that, what a false flag is and somehow be able to disconnect your emotions form all the beheadings, immolation and charred corpses, then you can go on about your business:

Earning and paying taxes so the gubment can keep running the war on terror.

Star for that post. Very true. I'm with you 100%. What I'm talking about is the psychology of it all and how it's used against us by those who inspire terror and our own "leaders".

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: intrptr

"The war on terror is fake."

I would not say its completely fake but we certainly had a hand in creating said terrorist, ISIS, Taliban and there like.

Roger that, Heres how they do it. They send in enough trained fighters and arms to attack prisons and release the worst barbarian, gangster, father rapers, arm them, give them a bunch of money and turn them loose on the civilian population...

"have fun"

Iraq
Libya
Syria (blames Assad)

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underwerks

"How to Stop Terrorism"

Impossible with the current generation our respective societies has helped shape and create.

But stopping our nonsensical bombing campaigns and drone attacks now might help retard the creation of the next generation. After all Its not like you can ever get them all in the one place at the one time, that's just not how terrorist cells operate.

Trumps take on the subject certainty does not help matters.

One of my main criticisms of Trump is that he based a large part of his campaigning on stoking people's fears about Muslims, Mexicans, liberals, basically any group that he could point his finger at and say, "Them! It's their fault! They did it!". How anyone can respect that and not see the game he's playing is beyond me. Donald Trump being elected president will go down as a W for ISIS. Mark my words.

originally posted by: LifeMode
a reply to: enlightenedservant

No other religion crafts extremism on a grand scale but Muslims. Beheadings, killing gays, killing adulterers. Calling anyone else who is not Muslim infidels, treating woman like trash. Then their reward of all these virgins. Ok, what about the women, do they get all these virgin men as well. I don't think so. A woman can't even travel by herself for more than a couple of days from what I have read. That is one messed up religion. No wonder they have so many problems. They also do not gel into western culture. A guy at work wanted to take 30 days off to do his Mecca cannon ball run. Yeah, my boss laughed. Nobody in the US gets 30 days of leave time consecutive. Then he asked for some special meal for the family day and never showed up. Insane. That is not going to work with US culture.

Yes, Muslims were not a concern when they wrote the first amendment. Now, instead of sticks and rocks, they have bombs. Need to get this outdated travesty of an amendment removed from the constitution.

a reply to: underwerks

Thing is a more skilled opponent would have tore strips off Clinton in both debates, its not like she's squeaky clean herself, but Trump just ducked and dived any and all questions making any meaningful debate almost impossible.

Is this the end regarding the US democratic process seems to be a valid question when people such as Trump and Clinton are put forward for the position of POTUS.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: underwerks

Thing is a more skilled opponent would have tore strips off Clinton in both debates, its not like she's squeaky clean herself, but Trump just ducked and dived any and all questions making any meaningful debate almost impossible.

Is this the end regarding the US democratic process seems to be a valid question when people such as Trump and Clinton are put forward for the position of POTUS.

It's to be expected from a candidate that by his own admission doesn't read books and gets his views on geopolitics from the people he surrounds himself with. I think this disease has been in politics for a while, we're just now seeing the serious symptoms of it.

We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

originally posted by: AshFan
We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

Or just make a conscious decision to not talk about them at all and in effect take away the power to terrorize that they crave.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan
We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

Or just make a conscious decision to not talk about them at all and in effect take away the power to terrorize that they crave.

Ignoring a real problem and hoping it goes away on it's own has not been historically helpful.

a reply to: AshFan

Lol fantastic, you think we need to get rid of parts of the first.

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan
We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

Or just make a conscious decision to not talk about them at all and in effect take away the power to terrorize that they crave.

Ignoring a real problem and hoping it goes away on it's own has not been historically helpful.

I didn't mean ignore it completely, but maybe if we stopped broadcasting our fears as a nation to the rest of the world and everyone else it would take some of their psychological ammo away. They only win when we become as they are, and that's where the current thinking on terrorism is taking us.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan
We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

Or just make a conscious decision to not talk about them at all and in effect take away the power to terrorize that they crave.

Ignoring a real problem and hoping it goes away on it's own has not been historically helpful.

I didn't mean ignore it completely, but maybe if we stopped broadcasting our fears as a nation to the rest of the world and everyone else it would take some of their psychological ammo away. They only win when we become as they are, and that's where the current thinking on terrorism is taking us.

I'd rather know its a danger, than be surprised while I'm drinking tea in Paris.

a reply to: intrptr

"Roger that, Heres how they do it. They send in enough trained fighters and arms to attack prisons and release the worst barbarian, gangster, father rapers, arm them, give them a bunch of money and turn them loose on the civilian population."

Sounds like those lovable degenerates at the Vatican if you ask me.

After all the Holy Roman Empire certainly tick all the above boxes.

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: AshFan
We should start calling terrorist attacks "Joygasms" and refer to the homicidal zealots as "Happy pumpkin fairies"

Or just make a conscious decision to not talk about them at all and in effect take away the power to terrorize that they crave.

Ignoring a real problem and hoping it goes away on it's own has not been historically helpful.

I didn't mean ignore it completely, but maybe if we stopped broadcasting our fears as a nation to the rest of the world and everyone else it would take some of their psychological ammo away. They only win when we become as they are, and that's where the current thinking on terrorism is taking us.

I'd rather know its a danger, than be surprised while I'm drinking tea in Paris.

Who doesn't know terrorism is a danger? We aren't living in a vacuum. Pretty much every activity one can take part in is fraught with danger on all sides at every point if you think about it. Letting anyone, whether that be terrorists in the ME or our own politicians at home direct us by using our fear is a losing proposition any way you look at it.

As to your other comment, pesky thing this constitution, huh?

a reply to: underwerks
Who said we are afraid? the media?
I can't think of one person I know in the USA and Canada that is afraid of terrorism.
Fact is we are more afraid of our own gov's and their institutions
says a lot.

a reply to: andy06shake

You ever wonder why the US gubment keeps all those millions of dastards locked up in US prisons and not executed, even for the most heinous of crimes? They shoot people all the time , but the really nasty ones get captured and incarcerated for 'life'.

If there ever were a substantial revolt in this country they'd do the same thing here. Let got the worst of the lot, arm them and send them into the cities, just like in Iraq, Libya and Syria. Imagine the likes of James Holmes, released, armed and given a free reign to terrorize the public?

Civilians would be too busy trying to defend themselves against roving gangs of murderers rapists and thieves, to organize against the gubment.

originally posted by: all2human
a reply to: underwerks
Who said we are afraid? our media?
I can't think of one person I know in the USA and Canada that is afraid of terrorism.
Fact is we are more afraid of our own govs than terrorism, says a lot.

The actions and rhetoric I hear and read daily tell people they should be afraid. If fear isn't applicable here, what's the big deal about letting Syrian refugees into the country? Why did Trump say he wanted to halt all immigration of Muslims until we "figure out what's going on"? Why did people support Trump when he said that? It seems the exact opposite of what I always understood as American values to deny others the right to freedom and a chance for a happy life over fear for my own safety. Maybe I was mistaken in that aspect.

a reply to: underwerks

It's the value system. Muslims do no respect the values of others equally in their countries. This is what happens in theocracies. If you are not of that faith you are treated less than equal. Same with Jews. All theocracies should be crushed. Not the religion, just the governments that bow down to one religion. We need a world effort to rid this planet of theocracies.

a reply to: intrptr

Sounds a lot like releasing the beast that is the dregs of our respective society.

What happens if and when these trained, armed, pedophiles, murderers and rapists manage to subdue ISIS?

How would we go about attempting to put that Jinn back in the bottle?

Seems to me we would be simply replacing one group of miscreants with another or they are just as lightly inclined to take up with the very same people we send them to annihilate given they tend to enjoy the same perverse tendencies.