It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How many ATS members still believe in the Moon landings?

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:26 AM
link   
Yes we have been to the moon. China is ready to go. Moon = Helium 3 in large quanity. a reply to: Helious



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: GodEmperor

Interesting idea but Im not sure the technology was there, or even today to make that feasible or worth while..cost vs benefit
I believe weapons need monitoring and I believe a certian shelf life.

China has recently visited the moon with rovers
techcrunch.com...



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

And trap souls for recycling - reincarnation



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage




What for?


Because it's there?

Its strange that no "official bases are up there; you'd think they would have some sort of bases as preparation to explore other planets. A lot of things don't add up.

Whats even stranger is that the US and Russia have nuke launching sites everywhere, and yet none have been set up on the moon which would offer a strategic advantage -

Then again maybe they have and are already leaving this planet



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 12:07 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

I think it's the tremendous cost involved. They are running biodome experiments and such so they are just now getting ready for the possibility.
I would think they need to go underground if they do.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 12:08 PM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight




and yet none have been set up on the moon which would offer a strategic advantage -

What advantage?
A sub can deliver a nuke in minutes. From the Moon it would take more than a day.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 12:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: GemmyMcGemJew
It happened, clearly. We have a mirror up there which we use to measure the distance between the earth and moon. Case closed.



The Lasers Bright Magic' by Thomas Meloy Page 876 "Four years ago (1962) a ruby laser considerably smaller than those now available, shot a series of pulses at the Moon, 240000 miles away. The beams illuminated a spot less than two miles in diameter, and were reflected back to Earth with enough strength to be measured by ultra sensitive electronic equipment." Many types of signals can be bounced off the Moon, even without any type of reflectors. In the 1950s, Moon-bounce was used to communicate around the curvature of the Earth. If you were in the military and wanted to talk with someone in Hawaii from California, you would bounce your conversation off the Moon.


According to Thomas Meloy's book, mirrors are not required to detect signals reflected off of the Moon surface. If true, it doesn't close the case. I used to believe the entire official story, however, in my silly opinion, there are enough issues with the scenario that I am unable to make up my mind one way or the other. I'm pretty sure we have been there a couple of times, but, I "feel" that we have not been informed of the entire story/history.
edit on 1092016 by seattlerat because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 12:38 PM
link   
NASA has completed a rocket strike on the moon. reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 12:55 PM
link   
*raises hand*



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: namelesss




one can peek through a simple telescope to see the trash left behind on the moon!
False.

I am so gratified with your single word refutation of what I said.
Obviously, we have a 'believer' here...
Whatever...

Apollo Moon Landing Flags Still Standing, Photos Reveal
www.space.com...

Don't let me wake you...



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: namelesss

No earthbound telescope can see any of the sites with resolution enough to make out details of any worth.

Nor can Hubble, it simply wasn't designed to, if my understanding is correct, see things that close by.

Only craft orbiting above the lunar surface can make out the detail necessary to confirm the existence of every one of the sites.

...and I'm old enough to remember the depositing of "said garbage".



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:32 PM
link   
a reply to: namelesss




Apollo Moon Landing Flags Still Standing, Photos Reveal

The source of that image?

Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera



I host no 'beliefs', one can peek through a simple telescope to see the trash left behind on the moon!
False.

edit on 10/9/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Aren't the flags visible from the orbiters in lunar orbit?



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:36 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull
No.
But the shadow of a flag is.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:57 PM
link   
I've never seen any reason to believe the landings didn't happen.

The video and photo recordings made on the moon would be difficult to fake even with present day technology.



posted on Oct, 9 2016 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

That's right, now that you've spurred my memory, I remember that now...



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:31 AM
link   
a reply to: lvnlrg

The moon is an artificial hollow satellite - part of a soul capture machine, or so they say



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

counter attack



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

Or so says John Lear, you mean. That alone mitigates against it being anything resembling truth...



posted on Oct, 10 2016 @ 01:10 AM
link   
a reply to: seagull

Not Lear, Gurdjieff

www.newdawnmagazine.com...


Gurdjieff and Ouspensky The Fourth Way philosophy claims to help individuals cease to be slaves of external and internal influences by building up a core of heightened consciousness. Its ultimate goal is the realisation of the full potential of human evolutionary possibilities. Its founder, George Gurdjieff (1872-1949), frequently spoke of the thoughtless mechanical behaviour of humanity, and was fond of commenting humans are “food for the Moon.”



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join