Rape victim to Hillary: You lied about me.

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: Gryphon66

Child abuse and crimes against women and girls are appalling, sadly, the right-wing in this country tends to favor the rapists rather than the victims.

You're so blinded by hatred for Clinton, you're advocating that the rule-of-law be scrapped.

Keep on with the limp appeals to emotion ... when I see you next week defending the rights of women and speaking out against child and sexual abuse, perhaps they'll be a bit more convincing, and not sound sooo much like you're using the story of a 12 year old girl to try to make political points.

If you want to talk about disgusting ... that's where I'd put my marker.

This has to be the most ignorant comment I've ever had as a reply. Congratulations on that.

Have you worked with child rape victims? I have, so FU.

Ah, and "FU" is not the depths of ignorance? What a maroon.

If you actually do work with rape victims, I would think you'd be a little more reluctant to dredge the story of a child being raped into the political arena. Do you commonly betray your cases dignity so cheaply?

Apparently, your regard for women and girls comes at a pretty low price, if your posts here have anything to say about it.

No noone here advocates that the rule of law be scrapped. Just that people are hypocritical, whats so hard about that to understand.

Just don't pretend to be all for women rights when in fact you are only when it directly benefits you. This lady denounced every single Bill Clinton rape victim, and also defended a child rapist.

Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.

- Hillary Clinton

Bunch of boloney

originally posted by: ghostrager
Have you worked with child rape victims?

I AM a child rape victim. But I don't let that get in the way of seeing the FACTS of the situation. All this emotional, faux outrage is just that. Based on emotions, NOT facts.

The OP didn't even post a source! It's just a bunch of edited tape from YouTube followed by what sounds like a bunch of old ladies gossiping at a pot luck! This whole thread is just manufactured outrage.

a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Snopes doesn't have a great reputation lately...

/yawn

And now we have folks stating that listening to and supporting survivors of sexual assault is BALONEY.

At least the real message is starting to come through.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Your entire point is trying to use a 40- year old legal case AND the sad matter of a child being raped for NOTHING MORE than to argue a political point.

A political point? Sounds like a character assessment to me.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Snopes doesn't have a great reputation lately...

Yeah, not with people who tell lies, exaggerate, and depend on emotional falsehoods for their positions... They don't like snopes, so they discount it. But an edited YouTube video is PROOF! Amen!

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ssenerawa
a reply to: Gryphon66my last sentiment to you

If you must behave in such a manner to support Hillary means you should re-evaluate your views.

You're not being honest Gryphon.


"Are SS soldiers justified in killing millions of innocent people because they were only doing their job."

Quite frankly I find it pretty sad. That you simply refuse to say no, that it is not and was not justified.

I see you can't even make good on a promise for a whole hour.

I've shown that your entire point, such as it was, is based on the most rank and vile imaginations. Your entire point is trying to use a 40- year old legal case AND the sad matter of a child being raped for NOTHING MORE than to argue a political point.

You find what I said sad? Fair enough. I find what you and yours are doing here to be utterly repulsive in every way.

Now, kindly keep your promise and move on.

Yes sorry I broke my promise, But I must respond I feel deeply bothered by your justification of this

And no I don't neccasarily find what you have already said to be sad, But instead that of which you are not willing to say.

originally posted by: Bone75

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Your entire point is trying to use a 40- year old legal case AND the sad matter of a child being raped for NOTHING MORE than to argue a political point.

A political point? Sounds like a character assessment to me.

I'm sure it does.

You and yours care nothing for this little girl or the millions like her. In fact, the corrupt bag of bones you folks support in the GOP is on the record, multiple times as being AGAINST justice for rape victims ... and then you have the audacity to come in here and chime in on the blatant pandering use of a young girl's tragedy.

You'll forgive me if I find that less than convincing, not to mention, gross.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Snopes doesn't have a great reputation lately...

Any source is just a source for a stepping stone to investigate further.

I don't write off either Wikipedia or Snopes - - - just because someone found an anomaly. Did person(s) contact site with correct information - - - or just whine and complain?

a reply to: ssenerawa

Your hypocrisy on this issue is abundantly clear.

You and I are done.

This is Hillary, nothing about this has ever been "debunked", only swept under the rug by her and her cheerleaders.

She went above and beyond the call of duty to get a pedophile child rapist that also brutally beat the girl, off with a light sentence.

She could have just shown up, oversaw her clients proceedings that they were in order and let justice hand out the severe punishment that convicted criminal deserved. But no, she didn't do that.

Her loyal servants even go so far as to say it shows strong qualities in her, tenacity etc. How puke worthy disgusting.

She further ruined that girls life, laughed about it, used the story as a backroom whispered threat to which the levels she is willing to go to scare her political opponents throughout the years. If she would go to such a sickening level of depravity to further her career from the opening bell of her professional life, imagine what she is capable of. There is no level too low to get what she wants, combined with the money and power she now wields through the Clinton Foundation she is counting on knees trembling and quaking like FBI director Comey so dutifully demonstrated.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
In fact, the corrupt bag of bones you folks support in the GOP is on the record, multiple times as being AGAINST justice for rape victims ... and then you have the audacity to come in here and chime in on the blatant pandering use of a young girl's tragedy.

Not to mention the current lawsuit against him for child rape!!! They'll defend him to the end for that, but since Hillary was involved in this case, she's guilty and should be in prison...

The cognitive dissonance is astounding!

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
This is Hillary, nothing about this has ever been "debunked", only swept under the rug by her and her cheerleaders.

Hillary did her job. That's it.

There's no cheerleading or sweeping under rug.

There is emotional made up crap from those who can't grasp a lawyer did her job.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Snopes doesn't have a great reputation lately...

FACTS do not have a good "reputation" lately according to Trump and his supporters.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

And now you and yours have brought this child's pain into the political arena.

You must be sooo proud.

originally posted by: Indigo5

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Snopes doesn't have a great reputation lately...

FACTS do not have a good "reputation" lately according to Trump and his supporters.

Isn't it interesting.

It's only the Trump supporters claiming Snopes is inaccurate.

Yet more inconvenient facts about this sad, disgusting case:

In her book “Living History,” Clinton recalls that Mahlon Gibson, a Washington County prosecutor, told her that the accused rapist “wanted a woman lawyer” to defend him, and that Gibson had recommended Clinton to Judge Maupin Cummings.

“I told Mahlon I really didn’t feel comfortable taking on such a client, but Mahlon gently reminded me that I couldn’t very well refuse the judge’s request.” Gibson corroborated Clinton’s story in a 2014 interview with CNN.

CNN, June 25, 2014: Gibson said Clinton called him shortly after the judge assigned her to the case and said, “I don’t want to represent this guy. I just can’t stand this. I don’t want to get involved. Can you get me off?”

“I told her, ‘Well contact the judge and see what he says about it,’ but I also said don’t jump on him and make him mad,” Gibson said. “She contacted the judge and the judge didn’t remove her and she stayed on the case.”

Factcheck.org

At least those of you who love such guttersnipe political abuse of a young girl's tragedy might bother to report the truth.

Oh, wait, that's right, you don't care about the girl you care about lying about Hillary Clinton.

I'm done.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Now, kindly keep your promise and move on.

Wow, look everyone, it's the bully of ATS.

Do you take their lunch money too when you rough em up and toss em out of threads like that?

You really showed em, bet you feel just like Hillary, your hero. Now give her portrait a Nazi salute and re swear your allegiance to all that is Hillary and everything will be all right again.

The amazing theming I keep seeing is people saying she shouldn't have done her job, that she should of let this person be tried without an adequate and fair defense.

My question to these people is how many people had this happen to them that were innocent ? Convicted on falsified evidence and witness testimony failed by court system as they were already presumed guilty in the eyes of public opinion. How many more would it be if we didn't have lawyers that fought tooth and nail for the client?