Assange Included on Obama's "KILLER TUESDAY" List

a reply to: Annee

Assange is no more different than posting what TMZ, and others do.

he's just an outlet.

What you folks don’t understand is that one of the requirements for being president of the US is that you have to have the morality of a serial killer.

Obama has passed that test. Hillary too and Trump doesn’t even need to take the test


A president, has to like any Mafiosi, has to earn their bones by either killing before becoming president like Hillary or doing it as president like Obama has with these morbid Tuesday’s of death.

Its in the nature of the job

Full disclosure.

I don't even like Assange, but damn droning the guy because he's in 'inconvenient truth' to the Clinton camp/administration?

Is EFFED up.

And everyone knows it. Though some can't admit it.

a reply to: facedye

Because there is no source for her even saying it, only misinterpreted emails.

If anyone thinks these sorts of things *don't* go on...I'm certain that they've never been in a meeting where things that are 'incredible' have indeed taken place.

No details for the OP, but with regard to these sorts of things - it's spot on.

Time spent giving details would compromise those sharing. Whispers from Washingtonian always have some truth to them.

What I find sad, is that after decades and decades of proof positive that for the most part, the Gov't *cannot* be trusted, there are those who still blindly pluck along their lives and go along with whatever the 'official' explanation is without another thought.

So many complacent, gullible citizens.

originally posted by: [post=21338277]ghostrager


Now, before you dismiss True Pundit as an unreliable news source, continue reading:

The author of the article says he is a 2-time Pulitzer nominee for investigative Journaling along with the recipient of a Gerald Loeb Award.

What????

The author?...Who is that again??? Oh that's right...He is anonymous!!!

WTF? Of course he can say he is a "2-time Pulitzer nominee for investigative Journaling along with the recipient of a Gerald Loeb Award."

He/she can make up whatever crap they like?..Cuz they are posting anonymously..

What bizarre argument for credibility you are making...It's true because the anonymous author says he is credible!!!

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler

Absolutely!

High level politics is not a TV show.

Did I specify Clinton?

I can't believe you are saying this.

You think a fat joke is worse than someone seriously contemplating murdering someone.

Well, at least your honest. I guess the rest of us know where your priorities are at.

I'm not condoning it.

Priorities? Where does priority come into this?

Reality sux sometimes.

originally posted by: neo96
Full disclosure.

I don't even like Assange, but damn droning the guy because he's in 'inconvenient truth' to the Clinton camp/administration?

Only Clinton?

Who in high level politics doesn't want this guy to go away? One way or another.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You poor thing.
Some people believe anything it seems.

I really question how your posts do not get deleted for thread drift and adding zero content to the discussion. It's amazing really. Quality posts get deleted while yours remain.

SPAM removed by admin

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: facedye

Because there is no source for her even saying it, only misinterpreted emails.

So you know for a fact she never said that, but can't point to anything she actually said to contradict that?

Why is it that you know that, but she can only "not recall" it?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You poor thing.
Some people believe anything it seems.

"poor thing" really? you refer to a fellow human being like that? you sound like Tim Kaine.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Grambler

Absolutely!

High level politics is not a TV show.

Did I specify Clinton?

I can't believe you are saying this.

You think a fat joke is worse than someone seriously contemplating murdering someone.

Well, at least your honest. I guess the rest of us know where your priorities are at.

These people are indeed living in a child's world mixed with a soap opera, WAYYYY too much TV and the NEWS on the brain, it is all co-mingling and has resulted in people possible more fanatical and swayed than anyone in history.

a reply to: facedye

If you follow the sources, they all lead to a couple of emails from 2010..

https://__._/clinton-emails/emailid/1099

https://__._/clinton-emails/emailid/1109

And comments made by Bob Beckel, also in 2010...

www.snopes.com...

None of which even mentions 'drones'.


ETA: Didn't realise wikileaks links were blocked here, the emails can be found through HERE

a reply to: ghostrager

Aside from the gang of 8 why would congress need to be notified?

SPAM removed by admin

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You poor thing.
Some people believe anything it seems.

Lol. You wish it wasn't true. I'd bet SOMEONE out there has proof of this.

Everyone knows how drone happy Obama is. Unless you drink a lot of kool aid and live under a rock.

It really doesn't surprise me in the least, tbh. Her response to the question said it all.

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You poor thing.
Some people believe anything it seems.

I really question how your posts do not get deleted for thread drift and adding zero content to the discussion. It's amazing really. Quality posts get deleted while yours remain.

Ikr? There is little substance to some posts... But what's a Hillary supporter to do??

a reply to: Chadwickus

Then she should have no issues declaring with certainty that she never said that.

You look way more sure about that than she does.

I think you're reaching.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
You poor thing.
Some people believe anything it seems.

Yeh you're right. Now look in the mirror because you're talking about your self, but obviously haven't realised it.