Assange Included on Obama's "KILLER TUESDAY" List

I didn't say it ,but if I did I was joking = facepalm

Little more info on the True Pundit author. Even Infowars' Paul Joseph Watson is skeptical on him - I'd chalk that up as +1 credential for the author.

It also looks like other people noticed the potential corroboration between Thomas1774Paine and Wikileaks when the article on Hillary droning Assange was released.

a reply to: Gin


Greetings-

Outstanding gambit Gin.. When You played the Deuce of Spades (Obummer), that gave You Rummy...

Well played.

a reply to: ghostrager

Yes they sure do. Got a mirror handy.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Do you really not find this credible? Seriously?

It reeks of truth.

a reply to: ColdChillin

What ever. This is a alt right wet dream and nothing more. If you believe it. Oh well it takes all kinds.

a reply to: AshFan

Whoops. Got that one wrong.

It actually meant exactly the opposite.

originally posted by: Denoli
I didn't say it ,but if I did I was joking = facepalm

Yeah, you ain't just kidding.

Incredible.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I was with you til you said "good"...

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
What sources "confirmed" it?

Why are they leaking National Security issues to True Pundit?


You know when you take off the confirmation bias glasses you all wear with Hillary that none of this makes sense, right?

Shhhhh don't be reasonable dude that ruins everything.

a reply to: NewzNose

She doesn't find anything credible unless it's on some mainstream propaganda outlet.

All communication with such people is quite tiresome and futile.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Makes perfect sense, when you study the history of this country and what atrocities have been done by the leaders of the US to its own people. MK Ultra, Agent Orange, medical experimentations...

PLEASE!

a reply to: facedye

That whole opening paragraph was ridiculous. I don't need anyone to tell me what to believe but it sure looks like some here do.
Sorry it's preposterous. It's beyond ridiculous.

And if such a conversation ever did take place you can be sure the people over at pundit blah blah would never have heard about it.

Registered early this year through a domain anonymizer:

Domain Name: truepundit.com
Registry Domain ID: 2012049985_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: www.godaddy.com...
Update Date: 2016-03-13T21:56:46Z
Creation Date: 2016-03-13T21:56:46Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2018-03-13T21:56:46Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited www.icann.org...
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited www.icann.org...
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited www.icann.org...
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited www.icann.org...
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Registrant Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant City: Scottsdale

ICANN whois

It's being hosted by cloudflare

IP Address:
104.28.2.83
ISP:
CloudFlare
Organization:
CloudFlare
Country Name:
UNITED STATES

ipindetail

Not much to be found from this angle. Of course, if I were to have a site dedicated to pushing out news the MSM didn't want to touch I'd go the same route; otherwise someone might suggest droning the ones putting out such information.

a reply to: ghostrager

OMG.

More right wing lies. Why is it that the right has to lie all the time? That should be a dead giveaway right there.

a reply to: thinline

GUARANTEED MUTUAL DISTRUCTION .
Yeah that's smart. Please stop.

a reply to: NewzNose

It reeks certainly.

No I don't believe a word of it. Really.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I think you do. Really. You just subscribe to the "head in the sand" technique.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: facedye

That whole opening paragraph was ridiculous. I don't need anyone to tell me what to believe but it sure looks like some here do.
Sorry it's preposterous. It's beyond ridiculous.

And if such a conversation ever did take place you can be sure the people over at pundit blah blah would never have heard about it.

sure looks like you're telling me what to believe

an obvious sign of someone who doesn't want to pay attention to something that might be true is an overtly emotional response. you've given very many thus far.

the general consensus here is that this is believable... because there have been more than a few instances where people in relatively high places have openly threatened his life or well being.

let me guess.. Hillary "doesn't recall" talking about having assange be a victim of a drone strike because that never happened either right?