Immunity deals stopped FBI from investigating BleachBit use in Clinton email case

Immunity agreements offered to two of Hillary Clinton's top aides prevented the FBI from looking into the circumstances surrounding the use of BleachBit, a digital deletion tool, to destroy the former secretary of state's emails.

[...]

The GOP lawmakers noted that, before the FBI signed off on the immunity deals, "it already knew of the conference calls between Secretary Clinton's attorneys and Mr. Combetta, his use of BleachBit and the resulting deletions, further casting doubt on why the FBI would enter into such a limited evidentiary scope of review with respect to the laptops."

Immunity deals stopped FBI from investigating BleachBit use in Clinton email case

So I guess we won't be able to grill Mr. Combetta now, even after the Reddit revelations. Very frustrating. This whole ordeal stinks to high heaven of corruption and collusion at the highest levels.

It blows my mind that such blatant shenanigans actually WORK for people like Clinton. DOJ, FBI, DNC... so many people are oiling the machine for HIllary that its unbelievable. Can Hillary - or any other person in the future - really get away with this kind of stuff? What can the public do to prevent this sort of thing happening again?

The clintons can- and have for decades.

Know who else does?

Pretty much everyone who is close with any of the presidents for the last thirty years- at least.

These GOP law makers, same ones that defended Bush WMDs lie to get in Iraq? Those ok just making sure.

They could have Hillary Clinton and the five aides tomorrow, if the wanted them. Simply by asking the NSA for all of the emails, text, and phones conversions of the people involved. So why haven't they done it, you may ask.

Probably because it would cause a Constitutional Crisis by indicting the President and most of his cabinet just before the election.

We already know from previous documentation that the NSA records all text messages, phone calls and emails. So all we are watching is a play put on by Congress pretending to investigate.

Why would the FBI or the DOJ offer any Immunity agreements to the 5 aides since the NSA had most if not all of the information to begin with. As legal protection for the aides from indictment. In order to protect who - Hillary Clinton.

I do wonder if Hillary Clinton is setting on an Immunity agreement of her own.

originally posted by: WishIKnew2
They could have Hillary Clinton and the five aides tomorrow, if the wanted them. Simply by asking the NSA for all of the emails, text, and phones conversations of the people involved. So why haven't they done it, you may ask.

Probably because it would cause a Constitutional Crisis by indicting the President and most of his cabinet just before the election.

We already know from previous documentation that the NSA records all text messages, phone calls and emails. So all we are doing is watching a play put on by Congress pretending to investigate.

edit on 5-10-2016 by WishIKnew2 because: (no reason given)

It's not so much I want Trump to win as much as I want Loretta Lynch and Comey ousted. She should have been gone after the meeting on the plane. Comey should have been gone after destroying the laptops before Congress got their eyes on them. He keeps saying no reasonable prosecutor would indite her but what she did was not reasonable. We need someone who is willing to go after people that do unreasonable things which means we needs someone who is not conventional at all, fair, but willing to step into Hillary's world and turn it upside down.

originally posted by: LifeMode
It's not so much I want Trump to win as much as I want Loretta Lynch and Comey ousted. She should have been gone after the meeting on the plane. Comey should have been gone after destroying the laptops before Congress got their eyes on them. He keeps saying no reasonable prosecutor would indite her but what she did was not reasonable. We need someone who is willing to go after people that do unreasonable things which means we needs someone who is not conventional at all, fair, but willing to step into Hillary's world and turn it upside down.

Oh...Clinton is going to leave a trail of destruction in her path...everyone who has had a hand in covering things up will lose their jobs or quit...meanwhile she will be taking rose petal baths.

Congress is not going to stand up and tell this story right before the election. If Trump gets elected then I would not want to be part of Obama's cabinet. I would fully expect him to go after Hillary and several others.

Hillary will be installed in the white house and America will bite the bullet (really, we will just bend over) and take it.

I have no confidence at all that anyone who was involved in this debacle will face any consequences.

When Bill and Loretta had their little hangar meeting, I knew the fix was in on the investigation.

Too many problems bound up with the Clintons for them to ever face justice. Trump (or Stein, Johnson, or even Sanders) could win with a 90% popular landslide and the electoral count would still end up in Hillary's favor. Americans have the NFL, Kardasians, bills to pay, and plenty of food in grocery stores. Nothing will change until something affects a significant portion of the aforementioned distractions to such a degree that the population are forced to consider the actual causes of the ills of society.

Until that time, we are screwed.

After that time, it will probably be too late.

originally posted by: WishIKnew2
They could have Hillary Clinton and the five aides tomorrow, if the wanted them. Simply by asking the NSA for all of the emails, text, and phones conversions of the people involved. So why haven't they done it, you may ask.

Probably because it would cause a Constitutional Crisis by indicting the President and most of his cabinet just before the election.

We already know from previous documentation that the NSA records all text messages, phone calls and emails. So all we are watching is a play put on by Congress pretending to investigate.

Until the election is over, she is worth more to the NSA and Intel community as an easily blackmailed stooge than an inmate. The second issue is that if NSA coughs up all the proof of Hillary's criminal activity, it will be a glaring indicator and solid proof of how far under everyone's panties the NSA have gone. I had the same problem with CSIS, did an FOIA request on myself and because the amount of information was overwhelming, I got the neither confirm nor deny BS, plus 9 national security statutes in a letter. They can't afford to spill the beans on Hillary as it would expose themselves.

Cheers - Dave

I was thinking about this statement "We need someone who is willing to go after people that do unreasonable things which means we needs someone who is not conventional at all, fair, but willing to step into Hillary's world and turn it upside down."

This makes me wonder what has happen to WikiLeaks. It seems we have an announcement saying that WikiLeaks will be releasing unknown data each week for the next 10 weeks. When the election occurs in 5 weeks. This like saying I will give you half of the information I have before the election. What about the time needed by people to review and redistribute the information they do receive.

I find this very strange in terms of delivery and I can not help but wonder about the data quality.

Rudy Giuliani: It Looks Like FBI's Only Reason For Investigating Clinton Emails Is To Hand Out Immunity Deals

originally posted by: RedMenace16
These GOP law makers, same ones that defended Bush WMDs lie to get in Iraq? Those ok just making sure.

You mean the ones the NYT admits were there? The same ones Democrats believed were in Iraq? Those ok just making sure.

They got away with crashing planes into the World Trade Center buildings, and the Pentagon, and 15 years later nothing has been done. Does that answer your question?

originally posted by: RedMenace16
These GOP law makers, same ones that defended Bush WMDs lie to get in Iraq? Those ok just making sure.

Is that the same war Hillary voted to go into?

I love this new found blame all our woes on one party.

BTW, Obama has

Bombed more countries than Bush (on countries no war was declared on) .

Used more drone strikes.

Authorized drone strikes on US citizens overseas (that may expand one day).

Careful, your partisanship is showing.

Psst. They both want the same thing, they just say what you want to hear.

a reply to: WishIKnew2
While Assange did say they'd be releasing information (in general) over the next 10 weeks - he also said he'd be releasing the US Election information before November 8. He also made a comment about 'if he was to make a major release of information about the US, he wouldn't do it at 3 oclock in the morning'. Felt stupid I watched it live.

ganjoa

Thank you for the information. Thought I would pass this along
www.infowars.com...
www.inquisitr.com...

What stopped the FBI from investigating BleachBit use in Clinton emails were the complete set of server backups.
Who the hell needs the server.

a reply to: SoulOfCeres

The issue with Combetta is he was given immunity in Dec 2015. He then had interviews with the FBI in like February and May of 2016. In the first interview he couldnt remember anything. The second interview he spilled the beans. This means he lied to the FBI after he received immunity.

Telling a lie when given immunity makes the immunity agreement null and void. He could still be prosecuted and anything gained from him can be used against anyone else who lied to the FBI.

Like Mills and Clinton.

I would suggest looking at this link www.abovetopsecret.com...


and this link www.abovetopsecret.com...


for your answer