It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the years leading up to his presidential bid, Donald Trump's charitable foundation donated generously to several conservative nonprofits that would later help raise his stature within the movement.
...
In 2013, the same year as his foundation's first donation to Iowa's Family Leader, Vander Plaats invited Trump to speak at the group's leadership summit, according to the mogul. Trump spoke at the American Conservative Union's Conservative Political Action Convention the year he gave the group $50,000, and said he was asked to speak at the Economic Club of Washington at an event the same year he donated there, too.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's looking more and more like the Trump Foundation and not the Clinton Foundation is really the corrupt charity of the two. I'm not surprised. A common tactic of bullies is to project their own faults onto others.
originally posted by: lordcomac
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's looking more and more like the Trump Foundation and not the Clinton Foundation is really the corrupt charity of the two. I'm not surprised. A common tactic of bullies is to project their own faults onto others.
Why not both?
While these friendships did not all pan out politically for Trump — Smith has continued to criticize the candidate, and Family Leader's Bob Vander Plaats endorsed rival Ted Cruz before the Iowa caucuses this year — the relationships did appear to be part of Trump's overall effort to boost his political profile.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Edit: Better yet, if he waited a few years he could have started aGoF*ckYourselfGoFundMe.
originally posted by: lordcomac
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's looking more and more like the Trump Foundation and not the Clinton Foundation is really the corrupt charity of the two. I'm not surprised. A common tactic of bullies is to project their own faults onto others.
Why not both?
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Because they keep getting a pass...like the NY AG and the 250 million in foreign donations that were not reported and should have. Krazy you have to stop with the denial...
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
It's looking more and more like the Trump Foundation and not the Clinton Foundation is really the corrupt charity of the two.
New York’s charity law clearly states: “Organizations that received a contribution or grant from a government agency during the reporting period shall include the name of each agency from which contributions were received and the amount of each contribution.”
In 2009, Clinton’s first year at the State Department, the foundation disclosed a lump sum of $122 million in foreign-government donations in its New York paperwork, posting the total amount on a form that requires all charities to “list each government contribution separately.”
originally posted by: thinline
So Donald trump used his chairity to give money to places where a charity would give money too...the horror
Trump has changed parties more then he changes wives. Since 2008, he's been a democrats, republican, independent, and back to a republican. All that time in his evil-sexist-racist-mysogonistic genius, he planned on running as a republican and made sure he greesed the wheels of the republican machine....sound about right?
In a flip side, how much did he donate to liberal causes during that time? Did anyone even stop to check that out. I k is that ruins the bulling on Trump, and that seems to be some people's favorite pastime.
I am sure he greesed any wheel that he had to, to do that vodoo that he did. When it's a pay to play system, you either pay or don't play, the Donald, played, so he obviously paid. Whom dos he pay, people like Clinton and Kain. Stop victim shamming Trump and point the spot light at the people who collect the money and not the people who were forced to give it
“It was a quiet donation that came with a simple cover letter,” Smith said. It read: “Great meeting with you and your wife in my office,” dated May 6, 2011. Enclosed was a check for $10,000 from the Donald J. Trump Foundation.
That check is one of at least several donations to suggest Trump used his private foundation, funded by outside donors, to launch and fuel his political ambitions. Such contributions, if they were made solely for Trump’s benefit, could violate federal self-dealing laws for private foundations.
From 2011 through 2014, Trump harnessed his eponymous foundation to send at least $286,000 to influential conservative or policy groups, a RealClearPolitics review of the foundation’s tax filings found. In many cases, this flow of money corresponded to prime speaking slots or endorsements that aided Trump as he sought to recast himself as a plausible Republican candidate for president.
The lion’s share of those donations came from Trump’s personal funds and went straight to political campaigns or parties. But others, in particular those directed to the nonprofit arms of conservative policy groups, originated with Trump’s foundation.
“If he could do 501(c)(3) to 501(c)(3), he did it that way,” said the source, using the tax code designation for nonprofit organizations.
But Trump has not donated to the foundation that bears his name since 2008, CNN reported last month, which means other donors bore the cost of his giving.
The donations to groups that granted Trump plum speaking slots or otherwise promoted his political aspirations also might run afoul of self-dealing rules for private foundations, which prohibit a foundation’s leadership from using donor money for its own gain.
www.realclearpolitics.com...