Third Witness Added In New Trump Child Rape Suit

As promised, the alleged victim known in court records as "Jane Doe" — who claims that Donald Trump raped her at a Jeffrey Epstein orgy when she was 13 years old — has refiled her lawsuit after last month's petition for voluntary dismissal.

Law Newz - Trump Attorney Fires Back After ‘Jane Doe’ Refiles Rape Lawsuit with New Witness

Two weeks ago, “Jane Doe” dismissed her rape lawsuit against Donald Trump and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, but promised to refile. It happened on Friday.

The original lawsuit claimed Trump raped the then-13-year-old plaintiff in the 1990s. There was also a second anonymous woman, known as “Tiffany Doe.” She said that Epstein had her pickup teenage girls for his parties. One of these girls was Jane, and Tiffany said she witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff several times.

The new complaint adds a third woman. She’s known in court documents as “Joan Doe.”

“In the 1994-95 school year, I was told by the plaintiff in Jane Doe v. Trump and Epstein (1:16-cv-04642, SDNY) that the plaintiff was subject to sexual contact by the Defendants at parties in New York City during the summer of 1994,” her declaration states.

Undertandably given Bill Clinton's own connections to Jeffrey Epstein, this is not something the Clinton campaign is likely to go after Trump with — in the same way Trump won't go after Clinton over Bill's connections to Jeffrey Epstein because of his own.

a reply to: theantediluvian

So remind me once more, why are we supossed to vote?

This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations?

a reply to: ksiezyc

No, they have to keep adding it over and over. If it's told enough times maybe it will become real. Lol

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: ksiezyc
This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations?

Because it makes no sense to update dead threads no one posts in anymore?

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: ksiezyc

No, they have to keep adding it over and over. If it's told enough timed maybe it will never real. Lol

Cheers - Dave

Yup. Looking desperate at this point. If Hillary doesn't win by a landslide, she's not going to have the political capital to do the things she wants, like burying Assange, destroying Brietbart, burning the basket of deplorables. So, her little minions are out strong trying to make that record correct.

a reply to: ksiezyc

A new witness has been added to a newly filed suit. I believe that more than qualifies it for a new thread. Were you popping into the 20,000 Clinton email threads saying:

"This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations? "

I'm going to just take a guess here and say the answer is probably "no."

a reply to: theantediluvian

I have little doubt that Trump is involved in a lot more deviant behavior than simply raping a single child. I expect after he loses in November we will find out his "true" form as information continues to build.

a reply to: jonsoup

Because there are no recent ones....not at all.

a reply to: rollanotherone

Ding ding ding! Without fail, there's always some robot calling me a shill in the first page or two every time I post about Trump.

I think you missed a couple threads here:

Did WikiLeaks Exclude Syria To Russia Bank Transfer Emails From Syria Files?
Dissecting The WikiLeaks Russian Connection - Part One

Care to comment on the allegations? The known connections to Jeffrey Epstein?

originally posted by: jonsoup

originally posted by: ksiezyc
This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations?

Because it makes no sense to update dead threads no one posts in anymore?

Why not? It's called archiving.

The threads are dead for a reason.

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: ksiezyc

No, they have to keep adding it over and over. If it's told enough timed maybe it will never real. Lol

Cheers - Dave

Yup. Looking desperate at this point. If Hillary doesn't win by a landslide, she's not going to have the political capital to do the things she wants, like burying Assange, destroying Brietbart, burning the basket of deplorables. So, her little minions are out strong trying to make that record correct.

Maybe it will be all over tomorrow, post leaks. It already looks like the devil's mistress is winding up her minions to start ww3.

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: jonsoup

originally posted by: ksiezyc
This couldn't be added on to an existing thread on these allegations?

Because it makes no sense to update dead threads no one posts in anymore?

Why not? It's called archiving.

The threads are dead for a reason.

There's literally a thread in the newest threads section discussing this.

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: jonsoup

Because there are no recent ones....not at all.

So what do you think about the allegations against Donald Trump in light of this new witness?

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: rollanotherone

Ding ding ding! Without fail, there's always some robot calling me a shill in the first page or two every time I post about Trump.

I think you missed a couple threads here:

Did WikiLeaks Exclude Syria To Russia Bank Transfer Emails From Syria Files?
Dissecting The WikiLeaks Russian Connection - Part One

Care to comment on the allegations? The known connections to Jeffrey Epstein?

Isn't he also known to run with Bill?

www.google.com... tml?client=safari

a reply to: theantediluvian

Already posted here. also a very "credible" source.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: rollanotherone

I said that right in the OP.

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: jonsoup

Because there are no recent ones....not at all.

Wait, so if its NOT recent it has no validity? That line of thinking is Fing sick!

That being said.......I withhold judgement until more is presented, this could be a hit piece, it could be BS......

No offense to the OP but lets see what evidence comes forth before we try to judge....anyone can allege anything

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

That thread and this thread are not about the same thing at all. That thread is about 20 former female contestants of The Apprentice saying that Donald Trump harassed them. Did you not open the thread and instead jump to conclusions based on the title?

Oookka reply to: rollanotherone

But Trump is the one openly calling for those things.