It's official: The FBI is covering up Clinton's crimes

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
The thing thats so funny about these threads..

Is that all these people get all up in arms about these emails.. yet no one has any idea what they say..


What if theyre simply just Hillsry trashing world leaders back n forth with Barack and they have been deleted because its a national security issue lol


Everyone gets all crazy over these emails like they give the location of where Tupac is hiding out at or something. Lol

The location of Tupac? You chose THAT mystery to compare the seriousness of the communications of the SoS?

Dude.

Don't worry Tempter, the guy is a joke, don't bother wasting your time.

So I am being investigated for a potential crime with a gun and they destroy the gun after taking fingerprints off of it? Is that a solid comparison here?

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: Lucidparadox
The thing thats so funny about these threads..

Is that all these people get all up in arms about these emails.. yet no one has any idea what they say..


What if theyre simply just Hillsry trashing world leaders back n forth with Barack and they have been deleted because its a national security issue lol


Everyone gets all crazy over these emails like they give the location of where Tupac is hiding out at or something. Lol

The location of Tupac? You chose THAT mystery to compare the seriousness of the communications of the SoS?

Dude.

Exactly. So I guess people who didn't even look at or participate in the Combetta discussion*, for example, see no issues "It's just about e-mails and nothing else".

*convenient how many of it was crickets from the peanut gallery

I dont understand what the OP is trying to say. The Article says the Laptops were destroyed after Reviewing the evidence. It makes sense because after reviewing it you dont want those Laptops to end up in storage and have someone access them. Are you implying the FBI is lying, and your proof is. Dont worry ill wait

So is there actually anything wrong with destroying the laptops after the investigation?

Or is this just an excuse for people to post "OMG" "I knew it" "What a joke" hyperbole without any actual reason?

originally posted by: tonycodes
So I am being investigated for a potential crime with a gun and they destroy the gun after taking fingerprints off of it? Is that a solid comparison here?

Not really no. If the gun also contained classified information in addition to the bullets then yes. To further the comparison if you are granted immunity for turning over the gun and classified info and no one else can be prosecuted with the gun or what it contains then there is no reason to keep is as evidence.

At least thats the mindset I see with the Feds.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Breaking now. FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, sources say. It seems that the FBI had a "side deal" with at least 2 of Hillary's aides, and they promised to destroy the aides' laptops after the FBI had finished examining them. And yes, these aides were given immunity.

At this point, anyone who can't see that this is a coverup is so delusional they need to be institutionalized.

I wonder if this might actually be the beginning of the end for the whole concept of immunity. If Trump does win, I think it would actually be quite easy for him to convince a federal judge to throw out all of the FBI's immunity promises, on the grounds that they appear to have been granted not in the course of seeking justice, but as part of a conspiracy to obstruct it. Heck, even if Obama pardons these people, the pardons themselves could be thrown out for the same reason: justice demands that the president not be allowed to pardon himself and his co-conspirators.

Your making some very serious allegations here - And if true the impications are obvious.

If the FBI is covering for the Clintonistas, now headed by Hillary Clinton, the game is over.

Your implication indicates that Hillary has already been 'chosen' to be the nesxt President of the US.

If the level of corruption that many have accused the Clintons of is so powerful so as to be controlling the FBi,
then it is 'game over' - We are fighting a losing battle here - You will become a world citizen of the
New World Order, like it or not, or you will be taken care of.

And the evidence is already there - The astonishing fact that the Clintons are about to take full control of
what remains of America - when, and if, there was truth and justice, they would not be allowed to run for
any political office, let alone President.

It now becomes obvious that they, the master manipulators of the political game, chose Donald Trump as the
opponent because they had enough on him, and because he is not a savy politician, and therefore they could
deflect the dark powers that they are using to try to make another Clinton stooge into one of their clones.

So ask not what the New World Order can do for you - Ask what you can do for the New World Order

Want to know what I'm talking about? - Wait to Hillary wins, the trouble that develops, the declaration of
maritial law and gun confiscations that follow - The New World Order will effectively replace
The United States of America




"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings."
-John F. Kennedy

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

...they need to be institutionalized.

Well, someone needs to be, i would suggest starting with the traitors to democracy and justice within the FBI that is actively covering up these crimes and are now effectively accomplices and are guilty of perverting the course of justice, helping to conceal crimes, and at the least, are being criminally incompetent and neglectful of their duty...then get Clinton for hers.

originally posted by: AlienView

"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings."
-John F. Kennedy

JFK rocks.. However lets bring the sentiment up to the 21st century with our current President.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Why am I not at all surprised. So the FBI gets information from these 2 aides, and promises them immunity, but then what else are they going to do with the information they got? Keep it stored away in some deep dark place, or use it against Hillary? Anyone?

They are going to store it in an evidence locker (well, vault, in this case) and preserve the evidence's integrity in case a trial happens (under this administration or the next).

Even if they choose, in the end, not to press charges, destroying evidence in such a manner is not the way to go. At the very least, it should be turned back over to the State Department and then their IT folks can determine what to do with it, if in fact it shouldn't be preserved (which it should). The fact that the FBI seems to have taken it upon themselves to destroy another agency's property which is possible evidence in an ongoing issue of potential illegal activities by a federal official is not the way it is supposed to be done.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
Breaking now. FBI agreed to destroy laptops of Clinton aides with immunity deal, sources say. It seems that the FBI had a "side deal" with at least 2 of Hillary's aides, and they promised to destroy the aides' laptops after the FBI had finished examining them. And yes, these aides were given immunity.

At this point, anyone who can't see that this is a coverup is so delusional they need to be institutionalized.

I wonder if this might actually be the beginning of the end for the whole concept of immunity. If Trump does win, I think it would actually be quite easy for him to convince a federal judge to throw out all of the FBI's immunity promises, on the grounds that they appear to have been granted not in the course of seeking justice, but as part of a conspiracy to obstruct it. Heck, even if Obama pardons these people, the pardons themselves could be thrown out for the same reason: justice demands that the president not be allowed to pardon himself and his co-conspirators.

Not surprised. Considering all government agents, officials and police are there to protect...... themselves.

So in aid of this, if anything should not surface. Then its swept under the rug. As always while the rest of us we do something wrong, we are given criminal record for next to nothing, lives ruined and thats it we all say the law does its job. Bullsh*t!

a reply to: SlapMonkey


The handling of classified material takes specific steps.

Those steps are completely absent until that classified information is in government hands.


Let me give you an example of what SHOULD have happened:

Government comes into possession of classified material it was previously unaware of.

The agency that gained the information, would report to their local Communication Security (COMSEC) office that they were in possession of a hard drive containing classified information.

They would generate a SF-153, such as:



They would do a possession of the hard drive, its accounting number would be the serial number of the drive. They would put the appropriate security label with the proper level of classification onto the physical hard drive. Such as:



When the drive is destroyed, it has to be documented again via SF-153, with the destroyed box checked and two signatures from witnesses.

The only question I see at this point is does the FBI have the SF-153 paperwork to back up their claims that the hard drives in the laptops were destroyed following proper government protocol. My guess is that no such paperwork exists.

The above scenario is based on my own personal experiences, I actually came into possession of two classified hard drives and this is the procedure that was followed.

I can't see the procedure as being any different for any unclassified hard drives containing classified information being used in a criminal investigation. There has to be accountability. The destruction SF 153 for the hard drives is what you are looking for, not the actual laptops.

My guess is that there are no SF-153's proving the destruction the hard drives. But even if they produced it, how would you know the serial number on the drive destroyed matched the serial number of the drive in the laptop?

a reply to: SlapMonkey

They are going to store it in an evidence locker (well, vault, in this case) and preserve the evidence's integrity in case a trial happens (under this administration or the next).

According to this letter from Congress to the FBI, they have already agreed to destroy the laptops:



Judiciary Committee

There will be no trial, Hillary Clinton will not face any consequences, the decision has already been made as to who our next president will be and there is nothing We, the People can do about it.

The Department of Justice has been compromised as has the FBI at the upper echelons. There are, I am sure, many hard working, honest agents who can do nothing but sit and watch as their agency is used to cover one of the largest crimes our nation has witnessed since the execution of JFK.

Justice Scalia's death was part of this though many cannot see that.

Think about who Hillary will be placing in the now vacant Supreme Court seat and who will likely be stepping down or passing on during her presidency and that she will be filling those spots as well.

Welcome to your new banana republic.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Everyone already knew this. Comey made it quite obvious. The question is how is it happening and how do we stop it and hold her as well as Comey accountable? That's the real mystery.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: AlienView

"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings."
-John F. Kennedy

JFK rocks.. However lets bring the sentiment up to the 21st century with our current President.

The JFK quote is amazing with that being said JFK gave that speech regarding the press to try and silence them with regards to military operations conducted in secret. The bay of pigs operation was a failure because the press leaked information on it before it happened. What JFK was trying to say is we understand your apprehension to keeping things secret because of these reasons, however this is what we are fighting "communist" not the NWO. Its fits perfectly with what he said when we apply it to our government now and that is truely sad

FBI is protecting President Obama, ultimately. He's the one that's "too big to fail". (President, African American, Legacy.. etc.)

originally posted by: carewemust
FBI is protecting President Obama, ultimately. He's the one that's "too big to fail". (President, African American, Legacy.. etc.)

Well unless they want to pull the country apart and have it in civil unrest.

Maybe this entire thing is being staged, it sure has divided the nation so far.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: ugmold
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Don't they usually destroy them for Security reasons anyway? They do it with phones.

Trouble is, this happened while the "former" State Department people were no longer government employees.

All the more reason to have them agree to destroy the laptops..

The FBI asks me to hand over my laptop so they can do a full-on search for everything current or deleted, you are going to have a tonnage of personal info on there...from financial records, to passwords, to personal conversations to porn.

Who would want all of that released in a FOIA request or some other "leak" by a committee?

I don't see it as strange at all. they got agreements that the FBI could search the entire HD of the laptops with their own technology, but would destroy it after extracting all info relevant to the case.

Honestly..all politics aside...what do people think is suspicious here?

originally posted by: Realtruth

originally posted by: carewemust
FBI is protecting President Obama, ultimately. He's the one that's "too big to fail". (President, African American, Legacy.. etc.)

Well unless they want to pull the country apart and have it in civil unrest.

Maybe this entire thing is being staged, it sure has divided the nation so far.

It hasn't divided the nation at all..

The people shouting "lock her up" are the exact same people that were shouting "lock her up" a year ago. Same people that thought Obama was born in Kenya..

Nothing new..

This whole FBI investigation was a sham. A dog and pony show for the masses. Now that we've seen behind the curtain, it will quickly be swept away and forgotten.

What ever happened with the BleachBit guy that was going to go before congress again after they saw his Reddit posts? Dunno, Kim Kardashian was in the news since then so I forgot.