It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So, after decades of increasing sexual equality, why are women not assuming equal "risky initiatives" responsibilities? Even if doing so can be at times anxiety provoking and sometimes result in painful rejections that are difficult not to take personally, wasn't one of the goals of women's movement "equal rights, equal responsibilities?" Over this time period, many other aspects of gender-role behaviors have indeed changed -- for example more women than men attend college today. However, this part of the courtship script -- female indirect nonverbal proceptive signaling and male direct verbal initiation -- apparently has not much changed. This suggests that something deeper than arbitrary social gender role assignments may be involved in the development and persistence of this robust sex difference. The reasons for the persistence of this sex difference may be largely beyond our awareness because they involve evolved psychological adaptations that operate below consciousness. We may be able to articulate what we desire and what we find aversive, but we don't know why we have these feelings.
Source
originally posted by: Profusion
a reply to: jappee
It's happened to me several times in my life, but it's relatively rare.[/post]
I have had more than half of my High School relationships promoted by the girl. (1986-90) and most since then as well. And I am only fair looking, but not shy. I would not consider myself even average in the looks department. I am pretty forward in conversations. And I approach women like any other human. I think it helps to not alienate them. Technically they're just one of the guys(but not one of the guys).
Girls/women do make the move. You have to see it.edit on 9/30/2016 by jappee because: heck i can't fix it....narf
originally posted by: jappee
I have had more than half of my High School relationships promoted by the girl. (1986-90) and most since then as well. And I am only fair looking, but not shy. I would not consider myself even average in the looks department. I am pretty forward in conversations. And I approach women like any other human. I think it helps to not alienate them. Technically they're just one of the guys(but not one of the guys).
Girls/women do make the move. You have to see it.
First Time Risky Relationship Initiatives
First time risky initiatives are direct and unambiguous requests that have not been made previously, and that will either be clearly accepted or rejected.
...
Nonverbal Proceptive Signaling
In contrast, proceptive relationship initiation signals are typically open to various interpretations.
LINK
originally posted by: Akragon
Most women won't "ask out" a guy because they never need to...
That's such a passive way to live your life. That's like leaving your life up to chance as far as I'm concerned.
If you wait for others to ask you out all the time, your only chance at a romantic relationship is who happened to be available when you were available...who happened to notice you at the right time...who happened to like you enough to ask you out.
It's like playing roulette with your life in my opinion. I think it's completely lame.
originally posted by: Akragon
I can only assume you're just a pup...
originally posted by: JinMI
I'm not a very outgoing guy and never had problems getting dates. Id wager about 80% were initiated by the woman.
Confidence is key, real or acted.
In a new book, Confidence, the psychologist Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic goes further, arguing that confidence is virtually worthless. On average, he reports, it's correlated with competence at about 0.30, which means the probability of the most confident person in the room also being the most competent is a paltry 15 percentage points better than chance.
SOURCE
Yet, there is little evidence for the positive effects of high confidence, and a great deal of evidence for its detrimental effects. Furthermore, although much of Western society regards insecurity as a sort of character disability, there are many psychological advantages to low confidence, and several reasons for embracing our inner insecurities and self-doubts. Consider the following facts:
1. There is no shortage of confident people in the world: One of the best-documented biases of human thinking is the "better-than-average bias," which concerns the almost universal tendency of people to regard themselves as better than the average person in virtually any domain of competence.
...
2. There is no evidence that overconfidence breeds success: Henry Ford famously noted that "whether you think you can do it or not, you are usually right."
...
3. There is a high price for overconfidence: Our evolutionary ancestors developed confidence as an internal alarm system that alerted them about environmental threats.
LINK