Canadian professor speaks out against bill c-16 and political correctness

Just listened to an hour lecture by a professor talking about the amendments to the current human rights code here in Canada and I don't even know where to begin. Social justice warriors are just puppets for the the social engineering program which has indoctrinated millions upon millions. Somehow I've managed to escape its toxic intrusion into my world view and I have maintained my healthy common sense to clearly identify what's going on. The extreme (and not so extreme) left is a sickness. The amount of labeling and broad sweeping definitions used by the left to alienate alternative or "right" thinking people is an exercise of absolute, nonsensical irrational logic. Whilst trying to create an atmosphere of an egalitarian society, SJWs are not aware they are infinitely delineating a myriad of hypothetical situations which will never please the totality of all. In other words, the more you try to make everyone equal the more you destroy societal cohesion. In "other" other words, knock it off. You can divide numbers infinitely and whenever you make more labels, you make more divisions. It's endless in the amount of concessions you can make for the sake of equality. Who says what's good for you is good for me?

A points summary on the video:
- Talks about the fear of institutionalized political correctness
- Speaks about the current bill c-16 and it's definitions
- Discusses the non-gender pronouns and how he refuses to be a mouth piece for the Marxist ideology
- Anecdotes describing fellow colleagues and their experiences with PC



These definitions here really bother me. "It is their sense of being a woman, a man, both, neither, or anywhere along the gender spectrum"
Both?? Neither?? You can't be both. These definitions now being applied to the Canadian human rights code are nothing but an opinion which has no basis in fact. None. Purely subjective and to think such sloppy wording can be passed as law scares the hell out of me. It's madness. IF you are born with "neither" you would be considered a hermaphrodite. That is the medical FACT and lets face it, if you are born with no genitalia...

Here's what we do know: If you ask experts at medical centers how often a child is born so noticeably atypical in terms of genitalia that a specialist in sex differentiation is called in, the number comes out to about 1 in 1500 to 1 in 2000 births.

...it's rare. So rare in fact, it doesn't deserve it's own gender label ZEE or whatever you want to call it.

Here's to more rubbish


"A person's gender identity is fundamentally different from and not related to their sexual orientation"

False. This line to be included in legislation is 1000% garbage. When 95% of sexual orientation is correlated with male>female, female>male then it is NOT fundamentally different. This crap is just absolutely staggering in its myopic limitations of the reality we actually live in. To be attracted to the opposite sex is NORMAL and is fundamentally correlated to their gender identity, ffs. This line of BS our government is trying to feed us is nothing but a flat out lie.

Well, I don't quite know what else to say at the moment other than there's going to be a clash and it will be in my life time. SJW people I consider to be an enemy trying to destroy societal harmony which has prevailed for thousands of years. Albeit, much more refined now but nonetheless, a complete break down of free speech to be controlled by thought police . You SJWs are driving a wedge into functional classes (which include yourselves) with the end game of not creating diversity but to instill uniformity. It's Communism and most of you don't even have a clue to what you're doing.

Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

And yet another front against the PC takeover attempt is born.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
And yet another front against the PC takeover attempt is born.

Don't try to equate Canadians with American ideology. Many similarities but also very fundamental differences as well. This would fly with only about 5% of Canadians.

originally posted by: intrepid
Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

And therein lies the rules of conformity. "Accepting the people". We do accept people and have gained tremendous grounds in 60 years. The problem is, we're going backwards now. I don't accept someone's right to dictate what pronoun I want to use. And I don't agree this was a bipartisan decision because I don't believe both parties are intrinsically different, fundamentally.

a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

No prob. It's Canada. Start your own party.

a reply to: intrepid

Been thinking about it. Trust me.

If you think the Government wants you to be gay, they're definitely winning.

Only conservatives could turn a group like LBGT into the Government narrative. It takes imagination on the levels of believing in demons to connect two groups in such a way.

originally posted by: intrepid
Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

Nope. Although I was born and raised in BC.
I thought a big part of being Cdn was tolerance, acceptance, and a live and let live attitude. I don't care what pronoun people call themselves, and they shouldn't care what I call them. If he wants to be called a she, or vice versa, they should tolerate when I make a mistake.

originally posted by: snowspirit

originally posted by: intrepid
Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

Nope. Although I was born and raised in BC.
I thought a big part of being Cdn was tolerance, acceptance, and a live and let live attitude. I don't care what pronoun people call themselves, and they shouldn't care what I call them. If he wants to be called a she, or vice versa, they should tolerate when I make a mistake.

And being Canadian they would. This is such a non-issue.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: snowspirit

originally posted by: intrepid
Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

Nope. Although I was born and raised in BC.
I thought a big part of being Cdn was tolerance, acceptance, and a live and let live attitude. I don't care what pronoun people call themselves, and they shouldn't care what I call them. If he wants to be called a she, or vice versa, they should tolerate when I make a mistake.

And being Canadian they would. This is such a non-issue.

Exactly. So why the new legislation? I think the larger message is not being fully digested from the OP. Do you have any comments/disagreements regarding the video? Maybe you haven't watched it

a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Be strong. Be vigilant.

Matthew 24.12. He also said it would be ‘as in the days of Noah’ and ‘the days of Lot’ before His return. In the days of Noah we read how the earth was filled with violence, and every imagination of the heart of man was only evil continually (Genesis 6). We read of Lot living in Sodom, where sexual depravity and homosexuality ruled the conduct of people. Lot was ‘who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked (for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds).’ (2 Peter 2.7-8). This is happening all over the world.

a reply to: chadderson

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition Edmonton.

My province is hard core Christian, couldn't sell booze on a Sunday until 20 years ago, and they aren't that "devout".

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: snowspirit

originally posted by: intrepid
Canadian says, "Really? You have nothing better to do?" 2 thoughts. This is actually bipartisan as it keeps some measures from the previous totalitarian regime and makes it more Canadian. You know, the accepting of people. Your thread should do well with people from Alberta though.

Nope. Although I was born and raised in BC.
I thought a big part of being Cdn was tolerance, acceptance, and a live and let live attitude. I don't care what pronoun people call themselves, and they shouldn't care what I call them. If he wants to be called a she, or vice versa, they should tolerate when I make a mistake.

And being Canadian they would. This is such a non-issue.

Exactly. So why the new legislation? I think the larger message is not being fully digested from the OP. Do you have any comments/disagreements regarding the video? Maybe you haven't watched it

If it's such a non issue... why are you blatting about it? Bored?

a reply to: intrepid

So we're clear, the non-issue is a) people already accept all types or b) the legislation?

You must be referring to the latter because that's what this thread is about. Legislation where it's not needed. The fact that we're all being forced by law to conform to a single ideology. You think that's a non-issue? It's not about "accepting" people anymore, we already do that. It's about totalitarian control. Yes?

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
It's about totalitarian control. Yes?

REALLY? Where were you for the last 12 years then? Methinks thou dost protest too much.

a reply to: intrepid

You're a man of few words. I'm not even sure we're having a discussion and I don't feel like re-typing out the OP. I've already made my point.

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: intrepid

You're a man of few words. I'm not even sure we're having a discussion and I don't feel like re-typing out the OP. I've already made my point.

Small words. No prob. My point is where was your indignation of government oppression in the 12 years that Harper was ACTUALLY doing it... even in his own party? And then this about... nothing.

a reply to: intrepid

Hated Harper and I voted for punk boy. But that's not what this is about. And you actually proved my previous point about both parties not being different. Same shirt, different day.

Please elaborate why "this" is nothing.

a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

Sorry. My finger puppets are in the wash.

I hate deliberate obfuscation.