It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MongolianPaellaFish
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
online polls
Credibility died there.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack
We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.
We do know of it. I posted a link to an article about a bunch of computer nerds HACKING the online polls. You obviously didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Yes, and I trust 4chans word about as far as I can throw it. That link is hardly evidence of anything. Show me something more official.
Seriously? Seriously? It wasn't a 4chan link. It was a news article ABOUT 4chan being about as trustworthy as you can throw it. The article is ABOUT 4chan.
Again, "The Daily Dot"? Thats your official source?
As far as covering internet news... yes, the Daily Dot is better than MSM at reporting internet related news. There are similar links from Fortune, Vox...
LOL, okie dokie.
Typical Trump apologist... head in sand sheeple.
Nah, you're just mad because the link you provided isn't anything worth note in the world of "officialdom" - You might as well go find some links from the BeforeItsNews website for me while you're at it.
And for those of us not caught up in the bullsh*t of either loser candidate Hillary trampled him and spent half the time smiling at the grave he kept digging himself
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: SKMDC1
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: imjack
We'd know of it by now. People cite things to fit their narrative. Its all there is to it.
We do know of it. I posted a link to an article about a bunch of computer nerds HACKING the online polls. You obviously didn't read it, or didn't understand it.
Yes, and I trust 4chans word about as far as I can throw it. That link is hardly evidence of anything. Show me something more official.
Seriously? Seriously? It wasn't a 4chan link. It was a news article ABOUT 4chan being about as trustworthy as you can throw it. The article is ABOUT 4chan.
Again, "The Daily Dot"? Thats your official source?
As far as covering internet news... yes, the Daily Dot is better than MSM at reporting internet related news. There are similar links from Fortune, Vox...
LOL, okie dokie.
Typical Trump apologist... head in sand sheeple.
Nah, you're just mad because the link you provided isn't anything worth note in the world of "officialdom" - You might as well go find some links from the BeforeItsNews website for me while you're at it.
Darnit, you got me. I'm just angry. Oh well...
originally posted by: possesed
rember shilary thinks evrybody is a racist ye but she won lol
cmon shes a mental patient
originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Bloodydagger
Just admit it, the fascination of Trump, is that nothing his supporters want is obtainable, or reasonable.
Just like how proof of online polls being cheated is beyond your comprehension. You're literally the only one asking for proof lol- Because no one else is that stupid.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I hope someone has already come along and informed the OP that those are surveys, not polls. Most can be taken multiple times on-line so, not an accurate measure. LOL! You crazy internet, you!
People reach all the time when it comes to Trump. They try to find anything and everything wrong in what he does and says etc. So if Trump is actually winning, there is something wrong with the whole process. People in America are retarded for voting for him, etc. People just find it impossible that Trump can win anything in this election. There is always a fault when Trump wins.
It honestly falls into the whole "It cannot be, therefore it isn't" category when it comes to Trump naysayers.
Truth be told, a lot of you have been brainwashed by the MSM to believe all of this crap regarding Trump and meanwhile, forget about the atrocities that Hillary has committed.
So to me, when it comes down between the two, I can't stand for what Hillary has DONE, however, all Trump has done are "words" and i'm hardly effected by "words", its actions that effect me and Hillary has had a ton of bad actions that have had negative impacts on peoples lives. But I guess most millennials these days get their feelings hurt over words easily and need a safe place with their participation ribbon collection. So its not surprising that Trumps words Trump (no pun intended) Hillary's evil actions more to some people.
For someone who has no actions to be judged by (except questionable business practices) what are we supposed to judge Trump on if not what he says? Stating how easy it is to spoof these internet "polls" is hardly reaching. Words are ideas, and putting a man in charge with these kinds of "ideas" if they do lead to actions is foolish.
Weigh in one hand what Trump has done, then weigh in the other hand what Hillary has done, then get back to me. Fact of the matter is this: We have an idea of what a Hillary Presidential era would look like and unless you're a blind liberal, its not good. As far as Trump goes, so what? So what if he doesn't release his taxes. So what if he rips off people? I'm more concerned in what Trump can do to better America. That is yet to be seen. Nobody knows what a Trump Presidential era would even look like and you're fooling yourself if you do. Maybe it'll be a disaster. Maybe he'll do some good things. Nobody knows. But we DO know what Hillary would look like and her numerous (already) failed policies and scandals. Hillary has been doing this for going on 30 years now and its been nothing but one huge bowl of scandal soup. Her track record is awful. Trump meanwhile, would be a complete virgin to the situation. So i'll take my chances THIS TIME on the "unknown" because the "known" is garbage.
And that is the entire point.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: imjack
a reply to: Bloodydagger
Just admit it, the fascination of Trump, is that nothing his supporters want is obtainable, or reasonable.
Just like how proof of online polls being cheated is beyond your comprehension. You're literally the only one asking for proof lol- Because no one else is that stupid.
Sorry, but I don't conjure up conspiracy theories if something doesn't fit my narrative.
He was the most dominant pure and simple. She got him with a few hard hitters, but he hit her pretty hard too. I was in no way, shape, form, or fashion, a Trump fan, and I'm still not. However, I'm finally considering a Trump vote simply because how dominant he is. In terms of world leaders, he demonstrated his dominance over Hillary
If you had to pick one of two cliff's to jump off of, and on one you could see it's water at the bottom and you may get scraped up on the way down, but you have a pretty fair chance of making it, and on the other it's just a blind jump into nothingness where it could be rocks, anything at the bottom. You're telling me you'd run and jump blindly into the one you don't know anything about? The whole devil you know thing, you know