It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Christosterone
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Christosterone
They are fitting her for a new ear piece so she can be fed answers...
-Chris
She never had an earpiece.
Go to minute 5:25 and tell me she is not being fed the data...it is inarguable that she is listening as she speaks...
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: TinfoilTP
would you be happier if she wore a pair of tight fitting jeans for crying out loud??
what will trump be wearing?? oh ya a male pant suit!!
why is it that trump's suit is acceptable but you feel the need to attack hillary because she is wearing what she wears?
by the way, one doesn't piss in a colostomy bag and I've known people who had to wear them. if she was to fill one during a debate like some have described...more than likely trump wouldn't be standing next to her and joking about it, because....
after a while..
THEY TEND TO STINK!!!
originally posted by: thinline
If I were Trump, I would try to cause HR(C) to have an episode of 'heat stroke' on stage.
I would say something to get everyone to make a loud noise.
I would wear a suite that has a pattern that could cause wooziness
Maybe make sure my watch is big enough that I could make the light reflect off of it
If She cannot handle stuff like that, she cannot handle being POTUS
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: thinline
If I were Trump, I would try to cause HR(C) to have an episode of 'heat stroke' on stage.
I would say something to get everyone to make a loud noise.
I would wear a suite that has a pattern that could cause wooziness
Maybe make sure my watch is big enough that I could make the light reflect off of it
If She cannot handle stuff like that, she cannot handle being POTUS
You think the Republican presidential nominee, someone who ostensibly would be entrusted to run an entire country, should purposefully attempt to induce a cerebral event in his opponent to eliminate her as an obstacle. She doesn't have epilepsy, but millions of people do, and seizures can cause permanent brain damage, paralysis, coma and even death if they're severe enough. And you think it would be a great idea to deliberately cause such a potentially fatal brain event.
You even say that this is what you would personally do if you were in his position. You also say it with some confidence, like perhaps you've done something like this to another human being before. That's beyond disturbing. And people actually seem puzzled as to why so many others are saying that Trump supporters promote violence and hate crimes against other human beings who do not share their political views.
Deliberately causing another person to experience a potentially fatal medical emergency by using light and sound to trigger a severe neural response is both violent and hateful in the extreme. And if they die as a result, it becomes premeditated murder. Yet this is behavior that you think befitting a potential future President of the United States.
Yeah...that's exactly the kind of mentality we need in the White House. You don't like someone? Just ambush them in front of millions of people and make them have a grand mal event...bonus points if they die from it too. No fuss, no muss. That's how we deal with people in America who disagree with us. Because we're classy like that here.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: thinline
If I were Trump, I would try to cause HR(C) to have an episode of 'heat stroke' on stage.
I would say something to get everyone to make a loud noise.
I would wear a suite that has a pattern that could cause wooziness
Maybe make sure my watch is big enough that I could make the light reflect off of it
If She cannot handle stuff like that, she cannot handle being POTUS
You think the Republican presidential nominee, someone who ostensibly would be entrusted to run an entire country, should purposefully attempt to induce a cerebral event in his opponent to eliminate her as an obstacle. She doesn't have epilepsy, but millions of people do, and seizures can cause permanent brain damage, paralysis, coma and even death if they're severe enough. And you think it would be a great idea to deliberately cause such a potentially fatal brain event.
You even say that this is what you would personally do if you were in his position. You also say it with some confidence, like perhaps you've done something like this to another human being before. That's beyond disturbing. And people actually seem puzzled as to why so many others are saying that Trump supporters promote violence and hate crimes against other human beings who do not share their political views.
Deliberately causing another person to experience a potentially fatal medical emergency by using light and sound to trigger a severe neural response is both violent and hateful in the extreme. And if they die as a result, it becomes premeditated murder. Yet this is behavior that you think befitting a potential future President of the United States.
Yeah...that's exactly the kind of mentality we need in the White House. You don't like someone? Just ambush them in front of millions of people and make them have a grand mal event...bonus points if they die from it too. No fuss, no muss. That's how we deal with people in America who disagree with us. Because we're classy like that here.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
(Sigh...) Do we really have to keep doing this? Here are 5 of the Democratic debates from earlier this year. Each one was roughly 2hrs each and anyone can see for him/herself that Hillary wasn't having seizures, passing out, soiling the floor, needing help to stand, and doing all of the other things the right wing keeps claiming.
This is literally why politicians and the "establishment" keep taking us for fools; because people would rather focus on trivial crap instead of the things that matter.
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: Christosterone
So once again, we shouldn't pay attention to what policies they'll put in place or which people they'll appoint to different positions. Instead, we should see if she's memorized a specific answer, is repeating someone else's words, or spoke directly from her heart. Right.
None of that will matter when he or she is the sitting President. They'll have advisors and consultants then, too. And guess what, they'll also have speechwriters for their speeches & press secretaries to "reinterpret" their words and give their official policy positions to the press. It literally doesn't matter.