It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: mc_squared
I am sure that I'd be neither welcome nor feel comfortable at a black supremacist meeting.
I'm also sure that most of them would vote for Hillary. So by your logic, she is an evil racist nut job also?
Master manipulators is more likely. Like I said, there is no race of geniuses. I'm familiar with Ashkenazi's master skills of manipulation and trickery. Then again, the way they have everyone snowed to this very day, you just might be onto something.
originally posted by: jellyrev
a reply to: JimiBlack
Ashkenazi Jews smoke everyone, close to a race of geniuses.
IQ scores predict with decent correlations a lot of outcomes so do not give me that bull.
The argument is still ongoing in trying to decide how much of IQ is genetic and how much is environment. Some is definitely genetic, but the level of which is being debated.
High IQ scores coincide with advanced societies. Democracies fail when the average IQ falls below 90.
originally posted by: Fromabove
Robert Byrd was the Grand Wizard of the KKK and a leading democrat Senator of whom Hillary praised. Should we consider her a racist just because the people she admired were or are? Trump as far as anyone knows isn't a racist. His record is one of helping minorities not hurting them.
originally posted by: JimiBlack
Poor example about eye and hair color, etc. My grandpa was copper toned like me and he had green eyes. Some of my cousins have his eyes. Some have dark blonde hair but most of us didn't inherit those traits but we're still close blood kin. Your eye, hair, etc. example was a poor one.
originally posted by: SprocketUK
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: SprocketUK
I think dividing one's culture along superficial lines like skin or eye color is ignorant and silly and promotes the ridiculous concept that there are different breeds of human, and that being purebred is something to hold onto.
If we're supposedly like dogs, and are different breeds, then we're idiots for dividing along those lines, because pure bred canines are the most unhealthy and prone to disease.
Poor analogy really, some breeds have innate problems due to stupid selection for specific traits, not because there is a weakness in a pure breed.
But why is it bad, to want to protect the look and way of life you love?
I'm sure green or blue eyes and red hair isn't everyone's cup of tea, but if there are people who don't want to consign those things to the history books in some mocha coloured future dystopia, what's so bad about that?
You wouldn't dream of dragging an Amazon tribe out of the jungle and forcing them all to abandon ther heritage and mix until they were just the same as everyone else, would you?
originally posted by: Darkmadness
I was also thinking about how I had never heard this term until Hillary mentioned it.
Isn't that weird?
I was also thinking about how I had never heard this term until Hillary mentioned it.
Isn't that weird?