Colin Powell's D***** Bimb** trending on Twitter in an insane turn of events

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: Darkmadness

Viagra must be a miracle drug!

I htink bills lung pressure caved in one day when he was boning a chick and it sunk his eyeballs into his skull a bit .

originally posted by: Kali74
This may be the best thing to come out of his emails... and I don't think Hillary gives a rats ass where Bill sticks it.

The real news here is that he's able to get any bimbos. Yuck!


a reply to: ketsuko

LMAO!

originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: Darkmadness

And her supporters say "hillary stands up for womans rights"


She cant even stand up for her own......

So much truth and clarity in that last sentence. If she has not and will not be her own proud independent woman, how can she advocate for anything in line with that thought.

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: Darkmadness

And her supporters say "hillary stands up for womans rights"


She cant even stand up for her own......

So much truth and clarity in that last sentence. If she has not and will not be her own proud independent woman, how can she advocate for anything in line with that thought.

Maybe they have an open marriage.

That would be a pretty progressive independent women.

a reply to: kruphix

Granted, that would be very progressive and something I'm in no way against. Then why the lies and why hide it?

originally posted by: stinkelbaum
a reply to: ColaTesla

And her supporters say "hillary stands up for womans rights"

She cant even stand up for her own......

in what way does this affect women's rights?

You know, sometimes people insist on being willfully ignorant. Or perhaps the original comment you are reacting to was a little too deep or obscure because it attempted to bring together two different factors about Hillary. I'd be happy to be corrected by ColaTesla if I am wrong, but I took the comment in context with Hillary's demonstrable lack of ability to stand on her own two feet. We've seen her struggles with stairs at least three times recently, and the recent 9/11 issue showed her being dragged to a van, where she lost a shoe and was what looked like completely incapacitated. Put those issues together with her "standing up for womans (sic) rights and you have a somewhat catty, but still insightful comment about Hillary's actual capabilities.

Now in terms of her health we're now being told there's nothing to see here; move along. If you believe that I think you're being delusional, but that's where we are today. In terms of women's rights, you have to ask yourself what she has, in fact, done to support them other than talk. Any significant legislation while senator? No. All we really have is a rather dismal and ineffective record as Secretary of State where "women's rights" took a back seat when she was soliciting donations from the Saudis to the Clinton Foundation. I'm guessing "women's rights" were never a topic in the Hillary State Department.

So that's the issue. Can she stand on her own two feet? No. What has she actually done for "women's rights"? Nothing. As my friend from Vietnam used to say when struggling with English: "Same-same." That's the issue.

Just goes to show that behind the eloquence, political savvy, and years of public speaking there's still a pragmatic infantryman in there. That sounds like something a soldier would say. I don't agree with General Powell in that Hillary is the only option, but I do respect him even with the Iraq mess that the Neocons in the Bush 2 admin using him to make the case for war in Iraq.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

Granted, that would be very progressive and something I'm in no way against. Then why the lies and why hide it?

Just because someone has an open marriage doesn't mean they have to broadcast it to the world.

a reply to: kruphix

Maybe to the average person. If your right and they do have an open marriage shouldn't the public at least be aware? I mean there are plenty of folks who would hold marriage as a high moral standard.

"Dick Bimbo PI" - HA HA HA HA HA, HAA HAA HAA HAA!

Bill's "Bimbos" according to Hillary... from yesteryear

a reply to: kruphix

No it doesn't.

But. When you claim you are for women's rights, most women, the first thing they think of, is NOT letting your husband cheat on you, several times, that is out in the public. What type of relationship you really have, isn't put out there. It is just what a traditional marriage is. And let's face it, her number one Aid left supposedly left her man for sexting. So no, she doesn't do crap for women. Because she can't even stand up to her husband. But if you believe other reports, she can sure threaten the women he slept with.

a reply to: ColaTesla

She cant even stand up for her own......

That's a huge assumption on your part.

Do you have some special, universal guide-book for human beings that describes the way that we should all be managing that?

DAAAAMMMMEEESSSSS!

I am sure the two of them are having fun at home
together while she is sick, man what timing!

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: kruphix

Maybe to the average person. If your right and they do have an open marriage shouldn't the public at least be aware? I mean there are plenty of folks who would hold marriage as a high moral standard.

No, I don't think we need to know every personal detail of the candidates.

Business details, medical details...sure, I agree with those.

But do we really need to know if Trump is into certain kinks that some people may not see as "high moral standard"?

originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: kruphix

No it doesn't.

But. When you claim you are for women's rights, most women, the first thing they think of, is NOT letting your husband cheat on you, several times, that is out in the public. What type of relationship you really have, isn't put out there. It is just what a traditional marriage is. And let's face it, her number one Aid left supposedly left her man for sexting. So no, she doesn't do crap for women. Because she can't even stand up to her husband. But if you believe other reports, she can sure threaten the women he slept with.

So, you said "traditional marriage" in your comment.

Which side is obsessed with "traditional marriage"? Why would Hillary care what that side thinks exactly?

originally posted by: kruphix

originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: kruphix

No it doesn't.

But. When you claim you are for women's rights, most women, the first thing they think of, is NOT letting your husband cheat on you, several times, that is out in the public. What type of relationship you really have, isn't put out there. It is just what a traditional marriage is. And let's face it, her number one Aid left supposedly left her man for sexting. So no, she doesn't do crap for women. Because she can't even stand up to her husband. But if you believe other reports, she can sure threaten the women he slept with.

So, you said "traditional marriage" in your comment.

Which side is obsessed with "traditional marriage"? Why would Hillary care what that side thinks exactly?

The more romantic partners a President has, the easier it is to find someone to blackmail him or her. That would be another way to look at it.

They don't call them compromising situations for nothing.

I mean it was his mistress that got Petraeus brought down.