Clinton is a healthy 68 year old woman according to new doctor letter

TBH, the only "healthy 68 year old woman" I know works out about four hours everyday and has been on a mostly ketogenic diet for a long time. So, seems unlikely for Hillary, given all of her known maladies.

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: ColaTesla

And you, no doubt, believe that.

Certainly not, Or the one in the OP, But you, No doubt believe that one??

a reply to: matafuchs

I guess we will see. This means she won't be backing out of the debates?

Great!

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of media-circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

a reply to: introvert

If she has pneumonia, that means her immune system is non existent. What I mean by this, is that her immune system is extremely vulnerable, and that usually, other illnesses come with pneumonia. People with pneumonia, should be in the hospital getting treatment, because that illness has a tendency of coming back, which means it's a chronic disease. It just shows she's not fit to be the president.

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

So yet again we are supposed to automatically believe a press release from the Clinton Campaign.

No links anywhere yet to any actual "Letter" from the "Doctor" !!!!!!!!

DaaaaHaHaHa

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

Was this "doctors note" sent by email?

If so, surprised it didn't get lost.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

It's solid proof of exactly what I stated:

"...the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience. "

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

It's solid proof of exactly what I stated:

"...the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience. "

What does the media marginalizing skeptics have to do with actually having evidence of the state of her health?

Isn't it the narrative of the Right Wing media that she is very sick, beyond her current pneumonia?

Do we have evidence or not? Your circumstantial evidence and "experience" means squat.

We need evidence.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

It's solid proof of exactly what I stated:

"...the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience. "

What does the media marginalizing skeptics have to do with actually having evidence of the state of her health?

Isn't it the narrative of the Right Wing media that she is very sick, beyond her current pneumonia?

Do we have evidence or not? Your circumstantial evidence and "experience" means squat.

We need evidence.

Have you not seen the news this past week or so? There was actual video evidence.... You should look it up Because an"excellent bill of health" was not what the world saw.

originally posted by: ColaTesla

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

It's solid proof of exactly what I stated:

"...the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience. "

What does the media marginalizing skeptics have to do with actually having evidence of the state of her health?

Isn't it the narrative of the Right Wing media that she is very sick, beyond her current pneumonia?

Do we have evidence or not? Your circumstantial evidence and "experience" means squat.

We need evidence.

Have you not seen the news this past week or so? There was actual video evidence.... You should look it up Because an"excellent bill of health" was not what the world saw.

Evidence of what?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: ColaTesla

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: introvert
Is there any reason to actually believe she is not in decent health, besides the pneumonia?

Despite all of the conspiracy theories surrounding her health, she seems to be just fine to me.

Only circumstantial evidence. She did pass out cold and the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience.

I'll wait for some solid proof, before I put too much into the conspiracies of another grown person's health.

a reply to: Nikola014

I'm not a fake moralist, and pretend I actually care about her well-being, and instead I'll tell the truth. Pneumonia will be like: I saw, I came, she died.

Pneumonia is not an automatic death sentence, as you make it seem. It is serious, but I would not think to take it to such dramatic conclusions.

Well, it cannot be said that I haven't already provided solid proof of media-complicity (including a media-watchdog), in marginalizing people with certain *taboo* questions, as being a part of pushing a comparable major lie, before now.

Some people may not want to admit that, but it's true.

Link

Believe what you want. But I know you can ignore inconvenient truths.

Is that solid proof that Clinton's health is failing?

It's solid proof of exactly what I stated:

"...the media has been working double-time, helping her marginalize the skeptics.

This kind of circumstantial evidence has been proven very reliable in the past though...at least in my experience. "

What does the media marginalizing skeptics have to do with actually having evidence of the state of her health?

Isn't it the narrative of the Right Wing media that she is very sick, beyond her current pneumonia?

Do we have evidence or not? Your circumstantial evidence and "experience" means squat.

We need evidence.

Have you not seen the news this past week or so? There was actual video evidence.... You should look it up Because an"excellent bill of health" was not what the world saw.

Evidence of what?

Sigh..... Im going away to talk to someone else.......

a reply to: matafuchs


This comes from a crooked doctor and campaign of deceit. Even if it were true, and it probably isn't, I don't believe one damn thing from Hilary Clinton and her campaign.

I can't belive they are continuing with this charade...

Her health is fine. Just a small lobe is affected and she is on strong antibiotics.

You saw for yourselves when she came outside and even said she felt great. She looked great too. Better then shes looked in years

originally posted by: ware2010
a reply to: stinkelbaum
what racist comments has Trump said?

That's been gone over and over and over. He has stated racist things multiple times. One should not have to source them every time.

a reply to: matafuchs

Her doctor released a statement that says she is in perfect health with low cholesterol and seasonal allergies.

I believe that about as much as I believe FOX claiming Trump didn't mock that reporter.

AKA I don't believe either.