Hillary Clinton in Twitter meltdown - or is it her campaign team?

a reply to: UKTruth

I doubt Hillary has ever used Twitter. She might not even use the internet at all. She has not driven a car in 30 years, so she really has no need for the internet either.

I went and posted some comments. People are going so hard on her on Twitter. The only responses in support are very few and far between, and most of them are shill accounts.

originally posted by: Darkmadness

originally posted by: alomaha
I didn't know that dead can tweet...

She's not dead she's defending our rights as citizens to freedom of speech through a social media driven campaign targeting one of the worst criminals in the history of mankind.

She's targeting herself then?

originally posted by: Terminal1
a reply to: derfreebie

Star for the Ellison reference alone... As well as a good story that pretty much sums up this elections feel even for people with thyroid and mouths.

Stunning but true. The Illumi_s all say 'surreal'; but with no
frame of reference to anything before this cycle-- we're
so far down the rabbit hole to the point I can almost smell
Egg Foo Old.

If I was Spock, I I'd probably say
"It appears we have been transported; along with a narrow
and lightweight Native American watercraft-- into the
middle of a small tributary consisting exclusively of
semi-plastic fecal matter, with no means of even self-
propulsion." But I'm not Spock, or any of those other guys.

Sleep tight neon Cheshire. I remember a 60's-70's band that
kicked some butt... that could have used that ava for a cover.

originally posted by: UKTruth
Hillary Clinton's Twitter feed exploded today with 20 tweets attacking Donald Trump in less than an hour...
The thrust of the attacks are that Trump is guilty of pay-for-play and would be corrupt as a President.
She is also calling out his children's campaign trip expenses and casting aspersions on the use of money.

This seems a very strange tactic, unless Clinton's internal polling numbers are a lot worse than we are seeing in public polls.

twitter.com...

Whatever is going on she seems to have completely lost it. Even if it is her campaign posting on her behalf she must have agreed it.

Is this just pure desperation at this stage?

It's called panic mode and the response is to throw sh*t and see what sticks. They are desperate to hide the health issues. They are desperate that Trump is ahead nationally and that he is even / pulling ahead in key battleground states (Trump +5 in Ohio over Clinton). They are in panic mode over the DNC discussing the possibility of replacing her.

Someone on Clinton's new media team are in the corner wringing their hands and rocking back and forth mumbling "Grandma is trolling on Social Media and undoing all their hard work". Way to go Nana Clinton. Another staffer with PTSD.

originally posted by: Darkmadness

originally posted by: alomaha
I didn't know that dead can tweet...

She's not dead she's defending our rights as citizens to freedom of speech through a social media driven campaign targeting one of the worst criminals in the history of mankind.

why is it that not a souI was interested in or fought against the eviI incarnate that supposedIy is DT untiI HRC became his opponent in a race for the white house? i mean..."biggest criminaI in history?" How ignorant must the masses be too that of aII to be defending its the first and onIy ever firzt Iady to be investigated and found at the middIe of biIIion doIIar fraud and not once but ten twenty times...
youtu.be...

a reply to: AlexandrosTheGreat

Several documentaries on the Clinton's talk about their signature game plan. They blame / attack their opponents for they very thing they do.

In this election it seems to be backfiring on Hilldabeast.

originally posted by: Darkmadness

originally posted by: alomaha
I didn't know that dead can tweet...

She's not dead she's defending our rights as citizens to freedom of speech through a social media driven campaign targeting one of the worst criminals in the history of mankind.

HA!!!!!!! So the latest tactic is taking what Hillary does and is and reversing it on her competition? Why don't you just post "I know you are but what am I?".

OMG talk about desperate.

originally posted by: Darkmadness

originally posted by: alomaha
I didn't know that dead can tweet...

She's not dead she's defending our rights as citizens to freedom of speech through a social media driven campaign targeting one of the worst criminals in the history of mankind.

How did you get 2 more stars than your post deserves???

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: burdman30ott6

So illegal immigrants are like insect pests eating our home from the inside out? Nothing deplorable about that analogy. I can't imagine what that crazy Clinton woman was talking about. Saying that a lot of Trump supporters are xenophobes, racists and the like. The nerve! Demonizing people like that! Why doesn't she go pick on those insects?

Trump is correct in the way he wants to handle the Muslim situation.

I know you're a bleeding heart and all, but I actually used to live in a Muslim country and in their culture daily.

I know from experience that you do not want them to move in next to you unless you know 100% they can be Americanized.

I mean, being a liberal I'm sure you think Christians are bad and probably wouldn't want them as neighbors. Well you ain't seen nothing yet.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: UKTruth

No he just said:

1. Ban Muslims from entering the US until an unspecified time. I believe the words he used were "total and complete shutdown?" Do you acknowledge that he said that? He's reiterated it on several occassions.

2. Place mosques and other unspecified places under surveillance. There's been multiple iterations of this, here's one from the middle of June:

"We have to go and we have to maybe check, respectfully, the mosques. And we have to check other places."

Back in November on Breitbart Radio:

"We ought to start [surveillance] up again, and we ought to start it up this morning"

Then there was the Yahoo News interview where he was asked if surveillance of Muslims should include warrantless searches?

France declared this state of emergency where they closed the borders and they established some degree of warrantless searches. I know how you feel about the borders, but do you think there is some kind of state of emergency here, and do we need warrantless searches of Muslims?

Do you remember what his response was?

“We’re going to have to do things that we never did before. And some people are going to be upset about it, but I think that now everybody is feeling that security is going to rule,” Trump said. “And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country in terms of information and learning about the enemy. And so we’re going to have to do certain things that were frankly unthinkable a year ago.”

Do you acknowledge that he said those things? Warrantless searches are flat out unconstitutional. Warrantless searches based on the person's religion violate even MORE constitutional protections.

3. In the same Yahoo interview, the reporter asked him the following question:

"Do you think we might need to register Muslims in some type of database, or note their religion on their ID?"

His answer?

"We’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely. We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully."

That was Nov 19, 2015. The very next day, he was a very similar question by an MSNBC reporter.

"Do you think there should be a database system that tracks the Muslims here in this country?"

Do you remember what Donald Trump said to that? I won't even ask you if you want to acknowledge that one because here is answer:

"there should be a lot of systems, beyond databases, I mean we should have a lot of systems"

Correct me if I'm wrong here but "beyond databases" includes databases? No?

So yeah, ban a group by religion, conduct illegal surveillance of their places of worship "and other places" (homes? businesses?) and get them to register for a database.

It's no wonder the always deplorable Pamela Gellar approves. So no, not quite "banning a religion" but not far off either.

He has said he will ban Muslins from entering the US for a period of time until the right checks are in place and he has said Mosques need to be monitored. Until there is a better solution offered, his solution seems the most appropriate in an age of radical islamic terrorism.

Personally this is about as logical a situation as you can get, just look at Europe for the 1.0 of what mass "unvetted" migration can do.. And please do not think you are stopping refugees as a majority of the people attempting to gain access to the west are simply economic migrants.

Everyone and their mother is claiming they are fleeing Syria, the actual truth is a majority will be from Pakistan, Algeria, Morocco,Tunisia,Eritrea,Sudan etc etc etc .. And quite how you can vet people that have zero documentation (as that is the case in Europe) is another thing and I hope if Trump does put a ban in place to get a proper system setup, then it will make these people that are trying to gain access illegally using refugee status think twice about not having any papers or any form of ID.

I have lived with a "enriched" mass migration policy when I was in London, all it has done is made all public sector services all but useless due to the strain of a massive influx of people.. Doctors, you can forget.. It is a 2 week wait to see my GP and I very much doubt the local schools have any places for my son..

But hey if you want the Liberal "stick your head in the sand approach" then go for it and enjoy the BS that comes with it..

Having my Taxes given away on foreign aid is one thing, it is a very different situation when people that actually tend to hate the west and western culture illegally gain access into a country for no other reason than the economics.. That I might add in a system that they have never put a penny into..

It may also make the "moderate" Muslim to start taking some responsibility for their brothers and sisters action and promotion of hate as franky all I see at the moment is f#cking tumble weed, no mass Muslim rebellion just nothing. Almost like it something that they agree with behind closed doors maybe???..... But you cannot say that, only Nazis and fascist say stuff like that...........

RA

originally posted by: UKTruth
Hillary Clinton's Twitter feed exploded today with 20 tweets attacking Donald Trump in less than an hour...
The thrust of the attacks are that Trump is guilty of pay-for-play and would be corrupt as a President.
She is also calling out his children's campaign trip expenses and casting aspersions on the use of money.

This seems a very strange tactic, unless Clinton's internal polling numbers are a lot worse than we are seeing in public polls.

twitter.com...

Whatever is going on she seems to have completely lost it. Even if it is her campaign posting on her behalf she must have agreed it.

Is this just pure desperation at this stage?

You think its a strange tactic to call out the other candidates behaviour and pick holes in their ideas?
The only desperation I see is from you creating this thread.

But of course, when Trump spams social media you don't think its desperation do you.

To be honest I'm surprised they managed to fit it all in 20 tweets. Another pointless thread for the Trumpettes.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth
Hillary Clinton's Twitter feed exploded today with 20 tweets attacking Donald Trump in less than an hour...
The thrust of the attacks are that Trump is guilty of pay-for-play and would be corrupt as a President.
She is also calling out his children's campaign trip expenses and casting aspersions on the use of money.

This seems a very strange tactic, unless Clinton's internal polling numbers are a lot worse than we are seeing in public polls.

twitter.com...

Whatever is going on she seems to have completely lost it. Even if it is her campaign posting on her behalf she must have agreed it.

Is this just pure desperation at this stage?

You think its a strange tactic to call out the other candidates behaviour and pick holes in their ideas?
The only desperation I see is from you creating this thread.

But of course, when Trump spams social media you don't think its desperation do you.

To be honest I'm surprised they managed to fit it all in 20 tweets. Another pointless thread for the Trumpettes.

I just wanted to highlight her meltdown.

a reply to: UKTruth

it would seem that you and i have a different definition of what " meltdown " means - hyperbole much ?

a reply to: UKTruth

I find it funny that she does this.

Because at this point, she's preaching to the choir.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UKTruth
Hillary Clinton's Twitter feed exploded today with 20 tweets attacking Donald Trump in less than an hour...
The thrust of the attacks are that Trump is guilty of pay-for-play and would be corrupt as a President.
She is also calling out his children's campaign trip expenses and casting aspersions on the use of money.

This seems a very strange tactic, unless Clinton's internal polling numbers are a lot worse than we are seeing in public polls.

twitter.com...

Whatever is going on she seems to have completely lost it. Even if it is her campaign posting on her behalf she must have agreed it.

Is this just pure desperation at this stage?

You think its a strange tactic to call out the other candidates behaviour and pick holes in their ideas?
The only desperation I see is from you creating this thread.

But of course, when Trump spams social media you don't think its desperation do you.

To be honest I'm surprised they managed to fit it all in 20 tweets. Another pointless thread for the Trumpettes.

I just wanted to highlight her meltdown.

And inadvertently you actually highlighted your own hypocrisy and desperation instead.

After being destroyed and exposed in a series of Tweets the only thing a Trump supporter can say is "very strange tactic".

Congratulations you've hit rock bottom.

originally posted by: SudoNim


And inadvertently you actually highlighted your own hypocrisy and desperation instead.

After being destroyed and exposed in a series of Tweets the only thing a Trump supporter can say is "very strange tactic".

Congratulations you've hit rock bottom.

No, this is just the only thing you decide to quote.
100+ posts in.

Didn't Milo allegedly get banned for this type of thing?

a reply to: Darkmadness

exactly, its like seeing two kids screaming and yelling at each other
he said, she said, she did, he did

i feel sorry for the american people for only having these two "adults" to choose from
im following this close and man, what a ride, its like watching a season of house of cards

have a nice day

originally posted by: DupontDeux

originally posted by: SudoNim


And inadvertently you actually highlighted your own hypocrisy and desperation instead.

After being destroyed and exposed in a series of Tweets the only thing a Trump supporter can say is "very strange tactic".

Congratulations you've hit rock bottom.

No, this is just the only thing you decide to quote.
100+ posts in.

Why does 100+ posts into a forum matter? Re-read what I posted and correct yourself.

the only thing a Trump supporter