It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Guccifer 2.0 just drops new hacked DNC documents

page: 4
79
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Corruptedstructure

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: ketsuko

I don't see how people don't realize this yet.

HOW ARE WE GOING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS!!!!!????

The WHOLE system is corrupt, yes, ALL OF IT. The entire damn thing. It has to be completely reset (destroyed).
Let's do a run down to see where the light is.....:
- Banks - corrupt and implicated
- Politicians - corrupt and implicated
- Educators - corrupt and implicated
- The Media - corrupt and spreading the disinfo' needed for a cover-up
- The Police - Corrupt and implicated (through none action)
-The Military - Totally corrupted and the main arm of the political apparatchiks arsenal.
-The Doctors Corrupt and tied down
- The Judiciary - Absolutely 100% corrupt and ignores the law to further this ghastly system
- Parents - Dangerously ill informed and lack power over their families.

Where is this leading? Rome? These leaks are a symptom, the problem is society.


It's the patient deliberate destruction of American Society by external ideological forces that have infiltrated all facets of our Government, Education and Society. Their goal is to fundamental change America. Haven't we heard that before?




America will fall without a shot being fired. It will fall from within

~Nikita Khrushchev



Sad that the only chance we may have is a bunch of hackers exposing the truth. Even then it may not be enough!



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:00 PM
link   
Is there an html version online? The download is NOT working for me.

I don't want to see any ledgers w/ambassadors and donations. Just emails. Thanks.




posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: sirlancelot

originally posted by: Corruptedstructure

originally posted by: mkultra11

originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: ketsuko

I don't see how people don't realize this yet.

HOW ARE WE GOING TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS!!!!!????

The WHOLE system is corrupt, yes, ALL OF IT. The entire damn thing. It has to be completely reset (destroyed).
Let's do a run down to see where the light is.....:
- Banks - corrupt and implicated
- Politicians - corrupt and implicated
- Educators - corrupt and implicated
- The Media - corrupt and spreading the disinfo' needed for a cover-up
- The Police - Corrupt and implicated (through none action)
-The Military - Totally corrupted and the main arm of the political apparatchiks arsenal.
-The Doctors Corrupt and tied down
- The Judiciary - Absolutely 100% corrupt and ignores the law to further this ghastly system
- Parents - Dangerously ill informed and lack power over their families.

Where is this leading? Rome? These leaks are a symptom, the problem is society.


It's the patient deliberate destruction of American Society by external ideological forces that have infiltrated all facets of our Government, Education and Society. Their goal is to fundamental change America. Haven't we heard that before?




America will fall without a shot being fired. It will fall from within

~Nikita Khrushchev



Sad that the only chance we may have is a bunch of hackers exposing the truth. Even then it may not be enough!


Once upon a time, we relied on the media to do what the hackers are doing.

Perhaps someday, we will look back on Guccifer et al the same way we look at Deep Throat today, but that will only happen if their efforts are worthwhile.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:11 PM
link   
Does anyone even know what they're looking at? I've been reading through the Matt Forney Twitter feed (that would Matt Forney of Taki's btw, for those who insist the alt-right is made up).

Let's take a look at a few of them:

There's a whole lot of tweets about collusion between OFA and the DNC. OFA is Organizing for Action. Organizing for Action is a social welfare non-profit (501c4) that essentially advocates for Obama's agenda. They operate the @BarackObama Twitter account and their website is www.barackobama.com.

I hate to break it to Matt Forney but 501(c)(4) organizations are allowed to cordinate with political campaigns. That's not illegal. He also says in one Tweet that ACORN was shutdown for "collusion" and that's not true. ACORN was defunded because of fabricated "evidence" pushed by Breitbart, Trump's new official "news" network.

From IRS.gov - Social Welfare Organizations


The promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office. However, a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. However, any expenditure it makes for political activities may be subject to tax under section 527(f).


edit on 2016-9-13 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:24 PM
link   
Here's another one:


Matt Forney ‏@basedmattforney 2h2 hours ago Memo to Obama deputy CTO Mike Conlow from 2010 shows plan for manipulating information online. #DNCleak #DNCleaks


So what's "manipulating information online?" Here, I typed the bullet points from the document:


- Continued to invest in improving our voter file processing capabilities, significantly decreasing he amount of time it takes to collect data from Secretaries of States across the country and compiles them into usable voter lists that organizers can access.
- Constructed an innovative suite of tools for legislative advocacy that helped Organizing for America win the health care debate online.
- Launched Raise Your Vote, a site that helps people to register to vote online, find their polling place, and learn about absentee and early voting - all in both English and Spanish.
- Invested in infrastructure including National Voter ID, which allows the Party to link information across our volunteer, contribution, email and voter file systems to get a complete picture of the people we touch, and the Voter Contact Service which allows us to quickly build new ways to contact voters.
- Created applications for Android, iPhone and iPad platforms tha the Washington Post called one of the most innovative advancements of the cycle.
- Built call.barackobama.com, which volunteers used to call voters from home.


What? Were you expecting something sinister as suggested by "manipulating information online?" Nope, run-of-the-mill voter out-reach stuff.

So far this is looking pretty meh.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:30 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

Fair enough, Now look into the pay to play, look at the list of donors, then google their name to see what their job title is....



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Darkmadness

roflmfao.....
wait.....ummm
.
.
.
roflmao some more.
..hold on...

might be able to contain myself....

nope.....ROFLMAO

too funny....

you should be a comedian.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:37 PM
link   
Donate 3million and you too can be head of the FCC ...



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:38 PM
link   
if your rich enough there`s no such thing as committing a crime, you just made a mistake.( the mistake of getting caught committing a crime)



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 09:47 PM
link   
Moving on, we a few Tweets about "a plot" to use early voting to FORCE an Obama victory in 2008! Well that sounds juicy right?


Matt Forney ‏@basedmattforney 2h2 hours ago #DNCleak shows plot to use early voting to force Obama victory in 2008. North Carolina used as laboratory. #DNCleaks



Matt Forney ‏@basedmattforney 2h2 hours ago NC Governor Pat McCrory needs to open an investigation immediately into possible Dem vote manipulation in 2008 race. #DNCleak #DNCleaks


The evidence? From Twitter source:



Show of hands — anyone know what this is? It's obviously a spread sheet but what is the data, where does it come from, when was it compiled and what does it mean? Anyone?

The dates don't match up for early voting for any 2008 election in North Carolina preciesly. All of their GEs were in November. Early voting by mail in NC doesn't start until September. Seems like it's the results of early vote counting from a particular NC district. It's also worth noting that the Republican vote count is significantly higher.

How is this proof of "a plot" to "force" an Obama victory in 2008 again?



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   
Tim Kaine was the VP pick as far back as 2009?



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
Moving on, we a few Tweets about "a plot" to use early voting to FORCE an Obama victory in 2008! Well that sounds juicy right?


Matt Forney ‏@basedmattforney 2h2 hours ago #DNCleak shows plot to use early voting to force Obama victory in 2008. North Carolina used as laboratory. #DNCleaks



Matt Forney ‏@basedmattforney 2h2 hours ago NC Governor Pat McCrory needs to open an investigation immediately into possible Dem vote manipulation in 2008 race. #DNCleak #DNCleaks


The evidence? From Twitter source:



Show of hands — anyone know what this is? It's obviously a spread sheet but what is the data, where does it come from, when was it compiled and what does it mean? Anyone?

The dates don't match up for early voting for any 2008 election in North Carolina preciesly. All of their GEs were in November. Early voting by mail in NC doesn't start until September. Seems like it's the results of early vote counting from a particular NC district. It's also worth noting that the Republican vote count is significantly higher.

How is this proof of "a plot" to "force" an Obama victory in 2008 again?




You're going to love the email were your beloved DNC admits to creating ISIS



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:04 PM
link   
It seems we have a bonafide political operative in our midst's.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   
DNC admits their own policies helped create ISIS ...

I have the screen grab of that one ... for posterity.

edit on 13-9-2016 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: theantediluvian

Fair enough, Now look into the pay to play, look at the list of donors, then google their name to see what their job title is....


Here you go calling it "pay to play" and a "list of donors." It actually says what at the column header? "Total Raised" not "Total donated" so it's not a list of donors first and foremost. Can we agree to tht point?

Let's start right up at the top and look at the names. Matthew Barzun. This isn't news folks. It's public information that Barzun was a volunteer for Obama in 2008 and a major fundraiser through small-donation fundraising events. He was also the National Finance Chair for Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.

U.S. ambassadors are appointed by the President and confirmed by Senate.

Genachowski was the Chairperson of the Technology, Media and Telecommunications Policy Working Group for Obama's 2008 election campaign. He was appointed to the position by Obama and confirmed unanimously by the US Senate.

No matter who wins the election, the new President will 100% appoint some people from his campaign to positions. You might really be shocked to learn that even DONORS are regularly appointed to various positions and *GASP* it's been going on since the days of the Founding Fathers.

Not criminal. Far from unusual. Certainly not a secret.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:10 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian

originally posted by: ColaTesla
a reply to: theantediluvian

Fair enough, Now look into the pay to play, look at the list of donors, then google their name to see what their job title is....


Here you go calling it "pay to play" and a "list of donors." It actually says what at the column header? "Total Raised" not "Total donated" so it's not a list of donors first and foremost. Can we agree to tht point?

Let's start right up at the top and look at the names. Matthew Barzun. This isn't news folks. It's public information that Barzun was a volunteer for Obama in 2008 and a major fundraiser through small-donation fundraising events. He was also the National Finance Chair for Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.

U.S. ambassadors are appointed by the President and confirmed by Senate.

Genachowski was the Chairperson of the Technology, Media and Telecommunications Policy Working Group for Obama's 2008 election campaign. He was appointed to the position by Obama and confirmed unanimously by the US Senate.

No matter who wins the election, the new President will 100% appoint some people from his campaign to positions. You might really be shocked to learn that even DONORS are regularly appointed to various positions and *GASP* it's been going on since the days of the Founding Fathers.

Not criminal. Far from unusual. Certainly not a secret.


pay to play



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

While you're screenshotting it. You might want to actually read it.



What's that that has been conveniently highlighted with a red box?

"Our invasion created the atmosphere for a Jordanian to start a Muslim sectarian war, which ultimately created ISIS."

What invasion is that a reference to? Oh look, next line:

"When the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 we triggered a massive insurgency against our presence"

Who was the President when we invaded Iraq in 2003? Not only does this not say what you're claiming (I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you actually read and comprehended it) it doesn't say anything that hasn't beens said roughly 100 million times before.

Care to explain why this is so juicy? Care to correct your egregiously inaccurate statement?
edit on 2016-9-13 by theantediluvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ColaTesla

That link doesn't go to anything that says that. Try again.



posted on Sep, 13 2016 @ 10:23 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

And that didn't actually happen until we withdrew our forces from the area allowing the instability to flower. Was ISIS there before or after the US withdrew their forces?

Oh after because it explains who things went to hell after our troops left allowing Maliki free reign to be a spud.



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join