I don't know man,
Hillary's really spitting green fire lately....or
you know, something.
...
On a lighter note, at least Trump hasn't done anything, or exhibited any signs to suggest he's a shapeshifting reptilian...
oh wait...
Dammit, I've gone cross-eyed...
---|---|---
:put: In all seriousness though, I originally thought Trump was a means of getting his opponent elected (or elected to the Primary) simply by making
them look better. Clearly that's not the case as he's going for a full run & picking up a populist lead (ignoring the "exist polls" and instead simply
looking at crowds gathering +sales of merchandise).
Is it possible he's actually non-establishment like he says? Hard to buy that when a Rabbi was sacked for protesting his AIPAC appearance, since
Israel (& the leadership it allows operate it) are basically
the Establishment as much as the Bush/Clinton Dynasties are. Could they've done
that on purpose to make it appear as much? I suppose, but it's using the "inception" principle a little liberally. "
Let's inception the puppet
master / puppet string appearance and inception the hacks of HRC after the inception'd leaks of the inception'd whistleblowing of the
inception'd...."
A major red flag for me was the fact the CFR Speech in Hillary's eMails were totally redacted. It seems whoever is responsible, or whoever has
control, sought to make sure those words weren't seen. It feels like it was intended. All the leaks & hacks were meant to be. If they were meant to
be, and HRC was meant to be hated, Trump was meant to win. If Trump was meant to win, doesn't that make him a puppet?
Some purport that the controllers, (powers that be,
whatever) have access to a machine / device, discovered in ruins, that can predict or
witness the future. It would explain how Hollywood seemingly predicts events before they happen. Maybe they saw Trump in POTUS, and just ran with
it.
The hardest thing to gauge, if he does end up in office...(which I would predict comes only after a HRC Win & subsequent recount / court decision,
will be judging if the economic implosion was because of his ineptness, because of
The Powers That Be opposing his rule (realistically, they
could cause a collapse anytime they see fit, so you can't judge
any performance by those in power, only by those behind it), or did it all
happen because he was fulfilling a plan. That'll be the major riddle in the end.
I'd like to think there are two sides to
The Powers, and, wars and strife---while religious/political leaders popping up throughout history
preaching peace & unity....and subsequently --so many efforts to genocide bloodlines out of existence; it really does seem at times there are a set of
'good guys' at the top. They are simply out maneuvered because of their lack of inhumanness to use the tactics their enemies do.
The alternative to everything I've mentioned her is the Third Option. What is the "third option?"
Probably has something to do with this,
a random poster plastered in a major city
(check your own for something similar), and in that case, neither candidate were ever meant to win. Think about it, when was the last time you've
seen, what appears to be, a co-ordinated effort to
destroy the image of both leading candidates, to the point they are barely electable
against a Blind Walrus.
Did I say in all seriousness...yes, yes I did....
edit on 8-9-2016 by boncho because: (no reason given)