It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: angeldoll
We've had a President in a wheelchair, a President with Addison's disease, and God knows what else we don't know about. And you think this is significant?
This is so petty. Petty. I'm actually embarrassed for anybody that thinks this is a big deal.
"Let's not vote for Clinton, because she wore an earpiece during a speech".
Does that clue anybody in on how absurd this is?
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Puppylove
I don't have to prove it was a hearing aid, nor does it matter if she was being prompted. You don't think all those speeches they give are written by someone else? If they prompt her, it's with her own ideas, as the speeches are.
This is a non-issue.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Wow, this is just unbelievable. She's clearly wearing an ear piece. The article says NYPD confirmed she was wearing one. And STILL Shillary sheeples are coming to post that it's nothing and just a normal ear.
Pretty much sums up the mentality of her supporters.
Sorry USA.
NYPD sources involved with the NBC forum’s security detail confirm Clinton was wearing an ‘inductive earpiece,”
originally posted by: angeldoll
We've had a President in a wheelchair, a President with Addison's disease, and God knows what else we don't know about. And you think this is significant?
This is so petty. Petty. I'm actually embarrassed for anybody that thinks this is a big deal.
"Let's not vote for Clinton, because she wore an earpiece during a speech".
Does that clue anybody in on how absurd this is?
originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Grambler
Show me one