Hillary Needed Help During The CIC Forum, Had Ear Piece

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: sirlancelot

Looks like an earpiece.

Go watch the video. What you are seeing is light reflecting of her ear.

a reply to: WeAreAWAKE

No there is not something obviously there. Watch the video for yourself youtube a slow motion function, use it. What you are seeing light reflecting off her inner ear.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: jjkenobi

She was wearing an ear piece. So what? Has that any impact on your life?

Deflection? WHAT? Because I would like to read some content?

An impact? YES!

I expect anyone running for President of the United States to be able to think for themselves, and not need answers fed to them.

If anything, it makes her look incapable. At the least.

originally posted by: poncho1982

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: jjkenobi

She was wearing an ear piece. So what? Has that any impact on your life?

Deflection? WHAT? Because I would like to read some content?

An impact? YES!

I expect anyone running for President of the United States to be able to think for themselves, and not need answers fed to them.

If anything, it makes her look incapable. At the least.

So are you equally unhappy with Trump then? Since he clearly uses an earpiece on occasions.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: tommyjo


Good grief. Do you not think that officials such as the US Secretary of State would have earpieces for translation purpose? It isn't rocket science!

So you're saying then she needed an earpiece to translate what Matt Lauer was saying? To quote you "Good grief".

No he was referring to the the email from 2009 where its suggested she used an ear piece.

Maybe try and keep up with the discussion before you try and belittle someone.

Belittle? I used the same reason and language used by the member. I know you Hillary sycophants like to stick together in the circle jerk but that's ridiculous.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: tommyjo


Good grief. Do you not think that officials such as the US Secretary of State would have earpieces for translation purpose? It isn't rocket science!

So you're saying then she needed an earpiece to translate what Matt Lauer was saying? To quote you "Good grief".

No he was referring to the the email from 2009 where its suggested she used an ear piece.

Maybe try and keep up with the discussion before you try and belittle someone.

Belittle? I used the same reason and language used by the member. I know you Hillary sycophants like to stick together in the circle jerk but that's ridiculous.

Yes, you completely missed the point of his post, assumed he was referring to something else and tried to make a witty retort. It failed. Move along.

Good Grief!

I see a pearl colored object in her ear, not a "reflection". The NYPD confirmed she was wearing an earpiece. Whose inner ear reflects to a round pearl shape? They are taking you all for idiots. It'scalled gas lighting. Dont fall for it.

She had her first press conference in 280 days and fielded 4 softballs. Seriously.

a reply to: SudoNim

Wearing earpieces for translations is different than wearing one during a debate. No?

originally posted by: mkultra11
a reply to: SudoNim

Wearing earpieces for translations is different than wearing one during a debate. No?

Yeah? Not sure why you are asking me that, I never suggested it didn't.

I just suggested that an email from 2009 saying "Did you take your earpiece?" could be referring to one used for translation purposes. No?

Makes sense. Politics is big business. Many people have money and future riding on these two candidates. The right message must be gotten out to those listening.

Trump should be given one. This way we could hear his normal ramblings plus those created as he reacts to his controllers. It would be both fun and insightful.

a reply to: theantediluvian

The first image of trump was not from the town hall. It was from 9 months ago.

Edit: Replied to wrong post. Same poster though.

a reply to: SudoNim

Trump hasn't used one when being questioned in a moderated forum. Stop being dense.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: mkultra11
a reply to: SudoNim

Wearing earpieces for translations is different than wearing one during a debate. No?

Yeah? Not sure why you are asking me that, I never suggested it didn't.

I just suggested that an email from 2009 saying "Did you take your earpiece?" could be referring to one used for translation purposes. No?

She was at the UN on 9-23-2009, so that might explain the need for an earpiece.
Link with photos
Although I do not know how the translators operated at that date.
In 'the old days', people wore headphones at the UN to listen to the translators.

a reply to: mkultra11

Do you have a link directly from the NYPD, or just some claim by a shady right wing site?

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: tommyjo


Good grief. Do you not think that officials such as the US Secretary of State would have earpieces for translation purpose? It isn't rocket science!

So you're saying then she needed an earpiece to translate what Matt Lauer was saying? To quote you "Good grief".

No he was referring to the the email from 2009 where its suggested she used an ear piece.

Maybe try and keep up with the discussion before you try and belittle someone.

Belittle? I used the same reason and language used by the member. I know you Hillary sycophants like to stick together in the circle jerk but that's ridiculous.

Yes, you completely missed the point of his post, assumed he was referring to something else and tried to make a witty retort. It failed. Move along.

Good Grief!

I know exactly what the point was. Oh, I'll move on since you told me to. Not.

Total Breitbart fiction. Originally tweeted yesterday morning by one of trumps sons.
Really. The crazy is hereditary. .

a reply to: starlitestarbrite

No you didn't see an untouched picture of any ear piece because it doesn't exist.
There are several other shots of her left ear that clearly show this claim is total bull.

I can't believe this tread is still going. all you saying she's wearing an earpiece look foolish, seriously!! i'm embarrassed for ats, frankly. why not join the threads where people are actually discussing what was said during the forum, not this nonsense. maybe that's too hard for most of you... not surprised.

originally posted by: knoxie
I can't believe this tread is still going. all you saying she's wearing an earpiece look foolish, seriously!! i'm embarrassed for ats, frankly. why not join the threads where people are actually discussing what was said during the forum, not this nonsense. maybe that's too hard for most of you... not surprised.

Embarrassing is a nice way of saying it.

It appears that some people's political desires and partisanship are actually affecting their eyesight, and now they are seeing things that are not even there.

a reply to: mkultra11

The NYPD confirmed? Yeah ok I have to see that.

This came from Breitbart via a tweet from one of the junior trumpets.
Again main stream media is laughing at trump.
The NYPD confirmed...ha ha...sure they did.