9/11 Suspects

Fellow ATSliens,

15 years Total War with Terror and no end in sight.
James Corbett delved into this rabbit hole again, thought I should share some pearls:







Anything to add or refute?
The amount of research is pretty compelling to say the least, check the hyperlinks in his transcripts:
www.corbettreport.com...

Who's your favorit suspect and do you think this presentation of suspects is a good idea? Any thoughts?

a reply to: PublicOpinion

From Christine Todd Whitman's Wikipedia page:

Whitman appeared twice in New York City after the September 11 attacks to inform New Yorkers that the toxins released by the attacks posed no threat to their health.

More than 1,100 have cancer after 9/11

Marcy Borders, "The Dust Lady"

Wrong again lady! EPA fails again.. slimeball politicians win again.. the people lose.. again. I'm disgusted by this bunch of jackals.

Christine Todd Whitman Dodging Any Blame (Of Course)

a reply to: PublicOpinion

I have watched James's short vid presentations and found them excellent . I guess the list could be expanded and we might expect him to keep adding as the data is worked . I guess Zelikow would be the # ranked one of the group to wear the evilist of the three for me . This vid is a epic snap shot of what we were told about 911 and is a must for newbies looking at the subject

a reply to: PublicOpinion

WTC 7 nuff said...

Thank you for the post this needs to keep being brought up.

9/11 was an inside job done by the shadow elite who run our "governments" from behind the scenes with hidden agendas that are obvious to many. The perpetual war will never end.

Time for people to take their heads out of the sand and stop being ostriches.

a reply to: DigitalVigilante420

"But.. but... they wouldn't lie to us!!!"

a reply to: PublicOpinion

I'd like someone to logically refute the Dancing Israelis sent to document the event...

Another smoking gun.

a reply to: DigitalVigilante420

I have not heard a decent explanation for wts 7 ever
and
I know so many people who havnt even heard about wtc 7 this many years past the event, it's still a secret in the main stream world, how and why

a reply to: FamCore

I forget the guy's name but that video of him crying during the conclusion of the 9/11 commission report is pretty telling. He apologizes to the people then walks away. I am going to try and find the video and edit this post.

Edit:

Currently at work and cannot find it on Youtube (looked quickly) but it can be seen within the first bit of Loose change, all editions if I remember correctly. I will try and return with more context to my post. IMO the clip of him crying has not been seen by enough of the population.

The fact they would only testify off the record, together and not underoath is the most damning proof it was a total lie

a reply to: Agit8dChop

now now...that's unsubstantiated innuendo

I'm sure there were perfectly understandable reasons for doing it that way

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

I know I know...

Cheney asking a democratic senator multiple times not to investigate 911 is also just unsubstantiated innuendo!

a reply to: Agit8dChop

I for one completely understand Georgy boy...if you're intent on lying...you better do it not under oath, also keep a guy that could devastate your responses...close to you so you can control what he says. Also, you dont want any records of what was said to be left for future revisions.

That's how I would do it...if I were a disgusting human being that is...

a reply to: DigitalVigilante420

I'd like someone to logically refute the Dancing Israelis sent to document the event...

Another smoking gun.

easy.

a reply to: PublicOpinion

S&F

My preferred take on 9/11:

Collateral-Damage-911-black_eagle_fund_trust.pdf

(It's a download, but a beautifully researched piece & worth the read.)

EXCERPT-

The case for detailed targeting of the attacks begins with analysis of the attack on the Pentagon. After one concludes that the targeting of the ONI office in the Pentagon was not random – and that information is presented later – one then must ask: is it possible that the planes that hit the World Trade Center, and the bombs reported by various witnesses to have been set off inside the buildings 1, 6 and 7 and the basement of the Towers, were deliberately located to support the execution of a crime of mind-boggling proportions? In considering that question, a pattern emerges. For the crimes alleged by Eastman, Flocco, Durham and Schwarz to be successful, the vault in the basement of the World Trade Center, and its contents - less than a billion in gold, but hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities - had to be destroyed. A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240 billion dollars of covert securities could be electronically “cleared” without anyone asking questions- which happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its “emergency powers.” that very afternoon. The ongoing Federal investigations into the crimes funded by those securities needed to be ended or disrupted by destroying evidence in Buildings 6, 7 and 1. Finally, one has to understand and demonstrate the inconceivable: that $240 billion in covert, and possibly illegal government funding could have been and were created in September of 1991. Filling in the last piece of the puzzle requires understanding 50 years of history of key financial organizations in the United States, understanding how U.S. Intelligence became a key source of their off-balance sheet accounts, and why this was sanctioned by every President since Truman. With that, a pattern of motivation is defined which allows government leaders and intelligence operatives to ‘rationalize’ a decision to cause the death 3,000 citizens.

a reply to: stinkelbaum

really easy...from your link.

One of the neighbors who saw them called the police and claimed they were posing, dancing and laughing, against the background of the burning towers. The five denied dancing. I presume the neighbor was not near them and does not understand Hebrew.

Oh...they denied dancing. I missed that part...oh well...I guess the issue is resolved then.

A woman who was in the building above the lot testified that she saw them smiling and exchanging high-fives. She and another neighbor called the police and reported on Middle-Eastern looking people dancing on the truck. They copied and reported the license plates.

two neighbor saw them dancing and exchanging hive fives...nothing to see here...

a reply to: stinkelbaum

And I thought we've had debunkers with logics on this site, not copy-paste from 911-myths. I'll make it easy for you: better stop using that site, it's full of lies and thus I didn't even bother to click your link. Sorry.

www.historycommons.org...

True story, they later allegedly sued the feds and lost the case.

Talking about easy... hard facts after all, innit?

Anyway - thank you all for your contributions. Bump this son of a Corbett!

one of the more interesting tid bits from this is that the guy that owns Urban moving, Dominic Suter...for which these guys worked for...jetted out of the US the very next day...completely abandoning the busyness and all assets owned by the company.

If that doesnt give you pause...really...you need help from a doctor.

a reply to: MarioOnTheFly

In the days following 9/11, how were the well-connected Saudis (and supposed relatives of Bin Laden) granted government permission to fly out of the country when airways were still closed to all other flights and Americans couldn't fly into the country??

Thanks for bringing up Suter abandoning company assets in US - I wasn't aware

a reply to: PublicOpinion

Let's not forget Pakistani ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmed (sometimes spelled Ahmad), who apparently wired about $100k to Atta and Sheikh.

His Wikipedia page is *interesting* to say the least. Every single person I've seen following the OS starts running around like a headless chicken when dealing with this issue:

Mahmoud Ahmed Wiki

A few notable excerpts from the Wikipedia page:

Mahmoud was IN WASHINGTON on 9/11:

General Mahmud was known to visit the United States regularly during his time as the head of ISI consulting senior officials in the U.S. administration in the weeks before and after 9/11. In fact, he was with Republican Congressman Porter Goss and Democratic Senator Bob Graham in Washington, discussing Osama bin Laden over breakfast, when the attacks of September 11, 2001 happened.[5] He was immediately called into meetings with American officials where demands of Pakistani cooperation were made and he was told to convey this to the Pakistani government. Joe Biden recalled the meeting: "I met with him to deliver a message, that if he didn't, didn't stop supporting the Taliban we would take him out." [6]

"discussing OBL over breakfast."

... I mean.. do I really even have to say anything?

Ahmed's REMOVAL from ISI for allegations of wiring funds to hijackers:

General Mahmud Ahmed opposed the US invasion of Afghanistan.[citation needed] He was retired from his role in the ISI on 8 October 2001, just prior to the US invasion of Afghanistan. He was replaced by Lieutenant General Ehsan ul Haq as the Director General ISI. On October 9, 2001, The Times of India reported that "US authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were wired to WTC hijacker Mohamed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh at the insistence of Gen. Mahmud".[7]

I was going to also get into some of the notable characters with regards to 9/11 insider trading, but that'll take a whiiiile.

S&F, great thread. thanks for keeping common sense alive.

We have a new one from James