It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ok, i'm tired, but ready to unload

page: 7
70
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Darkinsider

How are the vehicles launched?
How dangerous is their security and who contracts it?



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
if OP is a whistleblower then so is every other person that has posted something on the internet making claims, be it unicorns are real or farts don't stink.




I *wish* someone would blow the whistle on farts not stinking, so I could stop buying Febreeze.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:11 PM
link   
a reply to: seattlerat

Without having heard the interview I have to chuckle at the notion of "chosen whistle blower."
I'm going to listen just to hear what is said.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:30 PM
link   
a reply to: Darkinsider

This is really fun 😀. . . . . . I don't know if I believe it but, damned entertaining. I'm done with Politics for now, and it's refreshing to find an OP of this type! Crazy stuff like this is why I joined ATS. S&F
edit on 7-9-2016 by 191stMIDET because: Technical difficulty



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:35 PM
link   
@ seattlerat

I like the Pink Floyd Ref here! Made Me smile. Thanx for that!!



@ KD

Hey KD! Interesting Thread You have here! Taken from what I know of You, I believe this.
Don't let all the negative posts get to You. I doubt they would anyway...
But do PLEASE pass along some MEAT for The potatoes You have offered so far?!?
Just sayin...

Syx



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 12:46 PM
link   
In California, Vandenburg would be the logical location of space launches; just don't know how secret they are. P ayload, yes, that is secret.
Darkinsider, you mentioned twice that you didn't want to harm the US military. So this is strictly an American endeavor?



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:05 PM
link   
I wish the OP would log on!! I am sitting here gnawing on My Talons!! I want MORE!!!!!! LMAO!!!



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   
Okay I am not sure what I am more amazed at...

The fact the OP has offered nothing but supposedly knows everything...

or

The fact that this thread has gotten 32 flags for absolutely nothing but someone saying they know this is true because they have seen it.

ATS sure is changing...seems like many are more for pushing ignorance lately than they are for denying it.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:28 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak




I wish the OP would log on!!


It will probably be a few days so it helps the story that they were scared and had to hide, or something similar.

Or they come back soon and keep the fun going. Either way I have the popcorn and cold beverage ready.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

It's this stupid election, everybody wants some entertaining distraction. I guess.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: SyxPak




Taken from what I know of You, I believe this.


Do you really?



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Olivine

What's given to the public:

Vandenberg AFB Launch Schedule


8. Prior to the launch of a classified payload, the exact launch time is kept secret until about T-18 to T-4 hours. The launch window is also secret and not made public. Instead of providing the launch window, the Air Force announces a launch period - a large block of time within which the launch window falls.


Edited to Add:

They have an ideal and large spot right on the ocean and plenty of privacy.


The base encompasses over 98,000 acres, with 35 miles of pristine coastline stretching along the Pacific Ocean. It is truly a military installation in a national park setting.


Vandenberg
edit on 7-9-2016 by tweetie because: added info



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple




It's this stupid election, everybody wants some entertaining distraction. I guess.


Well it has been awhile since we had a thread like this...so it is kind of refreshing in a strange way.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 01:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Darkinsider

The blunt answer to you your question is.....be careful. When speaking about Secret Special Access Programs, Eyes, and ears are listening. I have protected myself from intrusion into my communication here...but, not to be scary or threatening...there is a full division in the NSA, unnamed that does nothing but monitor these sites. So there you have it.



Wait I'm confused you said NSA, then unnamed which is it?

And don't we feel special a "full division" just for us?


jk I hope to see more detail information, because many times on ATS we get a carrot dangled in front of us, with similar information that we've heard before.


edit on 7-9-2016 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer

originally posted by: Darkinsider
American military astronauts have left earth, have landed on other celestial bodies and have returned to earth since the '70s


Yes, the Moon. We know. Thanks for the revelations.
😂😂😂lol



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Darkinsider

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Darkinsider

Are you sure of it or do you know it? Bit of a difference there.

Also, why hasn't anyone local to these "4 monthly liftoffs" say anything?

Seems a bit, rediculous, if you ask me.


I know it!!! and if you believe the media will tell you the truth...I am sorry that is not correct. Although, I will say, that in all three locations, local reports have been mentioned in smaller news outlets about the sonic booms, the lights heading into the sky and all have fell on deaf ears, as we focus on the politics currently dominating the headlines......a perfect diversion for months. I know it.

Peace
KD


Was the Denver Airport "ufo" that was witnessed shooting straight up into the sky, leaving a hole in the cloud cover one of these launches?

soulwaxer



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:28 PM
link   
trying to inject something substantive here, I have met and heard bob lazar and let me elaborate his view of i think, s4 at area 51. he speculates that the drive unit he examined integrated gravity a and b with electromagnetic fields. now EM is easy to control, just requires power. so what might look like a rocket taking off but actually be using gravity and EM integration? a magnetohydrodynamic propulsion system...Russians created it years ago the electrical energy fires the gravity drive..
you would not see that but it might create microtremors in the vicinity..take a look at Vandenburg area on USGS small quake map. are there cyclical tremors every 6 months, for example.

Now, recently, faa announced a non transponder zone in CA. did it include Vandenburg??? I dk, but it would cover unidentified flying objects in the area. Ie., spacecraft as well as commercial air could not be distinguished on Flightaware....

so query. is what i am speculating here consistent with the special access space launches???



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: Darkinsider

originally posted by: ksiezyc
a reply to: Darkinsider

You didn't answer the question.

I am sorry, what specifically is the question you wish me to answer? I will, if I can, but ask me a direct question and I promise to respond.

Peace
KD



So is this a result of back engineering or our own ideas?




Reverse engineering.

Lawrence livermore labs has been reverse engineering for quite some time. I was told by the son of a senior scientist at the lab.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: darkstar57




I have met and heard bob lazar


That really isn't going to help you prove your point as you know what many on here think of him.

I enjoy the stories, but I feel they are just that...although I have been wrong before.

Just saying.



posted on Sep, 7 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: darkstar57




Now, recently, faa announced a non transponder zone in CA. did it include Vandenburg???


Could you elaborate more on this?

I can't seem to find anything about this.



new topics

top topics



 
70
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join