It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(bold emphasis added).
15g.) Political Baiting: You will not engage in politically-charged rhetoric, politically-inspired name-calling, and related right-versus-left political bickering while Posting in any topical forum or discussion thread on the Websites. You will not alter political candidate names or party affiliations in order to insult or deride the opposition.
What? Pleeeeease. Hillary is Awesome!!! . . . . . She and Trump should take a bath together . . . In the Caldera of an active Volcano imo. 😘 just kidding, but honestly, 2016? Worst Election choices ever.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Vroomfondel
She's never been trained in diplomacy. She was a first lady and a state senator for one term.
And just because you held positions does NOT mean you are qualified.
She's proven herself incompetent. Unreliable. Unprofessional.
She was a crooked lawyer, a bad first lady, an ineffective senator, a train-wreck as Sec of State.
The ONLY good thing she has done w as to illuminate how corrupt our system actually is.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Classified material is classified material. Congress would have to establish a need to know, just like anybody else, before getting to read classified material. All the more so in an open hearing.
I can think of any number of things that the freshman congressman from Idaho doesn't have any need to know, much less the general public, that a Secretary of State would know.
Like the security status of embassies and consulates and non-acknowledged sites around the world.
originally posted by: Snarl
She was working with Intelligence material. That's highly classified.
She was working with HUMINT. That's even more highly classified.
You know ... Above Top Secret (except all uppercase).
The reason they found the paragraph markings with the little ( C ) thingy ... well the 'substitutionists' merely forgot about those pesky little varmints and failed to remove them.
What they're not telling you is that ... every paragraph in a classified document has to be individually marked at the highest classification of the material contained therein. So ... somebody went through and deleted all the ( S ) and ( TS ) and special caveats. They just don't mention it ... and it seems everyone is too dumb to ask about that.
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
And killary says she didn't know what the big "C" meant, and cant remember being trained on how to handle classified material...
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Classified material is classified material. Congress would have to establish a need to know, just like anybody else, before getting to read classified material. All the more so in an open hearing.
I can think of any number of things that the freshman congressman from Idaho doesn't have any need to know, much less the general public, that a Secretary of State would know.
Like the security status of embassies and consulates and non-acknowledged sites around the world.
He didnt ask for the classifed material to be read in an open hearing. He just asked if congress could be provided the emails in a classified format. The response he got was no, and I cant even tell you who has them... That is screwed up. Its one thing to deny the information in an open hearing, which I agree with. But to deny it to congress in a classified format and refuse even mentioning the name of the organization controlling it...something is very wrong there.
He could just as well have said, "I could tell you - but then I would have to kill you."
originally posted by: Shamrock6
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Vroomfondel
Classified material is classified material. Congress would have to establish a need to know, just like anybody else, before getting to read classified material. All the more so in an open hearing.
I can think of any number of things that the freshman congressman from Idaho doesn't have any need to know, much less the general public, that a Secretary of State would know.
Like the security status of embassies and consulates and non-acknowledged sites around the world.
He didnt ask for the classifed material to be read in an open hearing. He just asked if congress could be provided the emails in a classified format. The response he got was no, and I cant even tell you who has them... That is screwed up. Its one thing to deny the information in an open hearing, which I agree with. But to deny it to congress in a classified format and refuse even mentioning the name of the organization controlling it...something is very wrong there.
He could just as well have said, "I could tell you - but then I would have to kill you."
And again, any member of congress does not have carte blanch to read whatever classified material they want, whether the possession of said material is under investigation or not.
Sources and methods? Yea right, between that and the nuclear codes it's a toss up as to what's a more closely held secret.
And not revealing what agency classified the information denies the Ugandan intelligence minister that's watching CNN the ability to home in on what kind of information is floating around. Kind of like how not everybody who works at an intelligence agency tells their neighbor's that they work at an intelligence agency.
Just because Hillary and Co. are cavalier with classified information doesn't mean everybody else gets to be. This is incredibly basic, low level, learned it on day three of the job classified material handling.
In 2011, Chaffetz was warned by the Department of Homeland Security to stop leaking sensitive information. The Washington Post reported, “a clearly miffed Department of Homeland Security Deputy Counsel Joseph B. Maher told Chaffetz that ‘sensitive security information’ provided to his subcommittee by the Transportation Security Administration was illegally disclosed to the press.”
Chaffetz followed up that fail by blowing the CIA’s cover during a Congressional Hearing in 2012, endangering lives.
www.politicususa.com...
Diazepam is used for a variety of ailments, most of which are quite serious.