It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
And what the hell is with Chelsea being in the Benghazi loop?
Hillary emailed her that night about the attack.
Wtf?
Why is Chelsea Clinton a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Sure. The republicans would never allow anything that would make it easy.
This is really getting desperate guys don't you think.
None of this crap is going to change a thing. She's already won this thing.
Bye bye Trump. You loser scam artist.
I wonder...what interests might the Clinton Crime Foundation have had in all of this?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
Sure. The republicans would never allow anything that would make it easy.
This is really getting desperate guys don't you think.
None of this crap is going to change a thing. She's already won this thing.
Bye bye Trump. You loser scam artist.
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: burgerbuddy
And what the hell is with Chelsea being in the Benghazi loop?
Hillary emailed her that night about the attack.
Wtf?
Why is Chelsea Clinton a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?
She is? I didn't know that!
Then they will all go down if the CF and CGI whatever is investigated.
Not to derail the OP but damn!
Is there anyone involved with them the least bit remotely honest?
We'd have to turn Guam into a giant Gitmo.
Is Gilligans Island for sale? A little Lord of the Flies would be good for all of them.
There would be plenty of good job openings, tho.
I have run across a rather interesting document which outlines in detail the principal current objectives of the House Benghazi Committee, and was wondering if you might have a minute or two to discuss this. If you are anywhere near 1333 H in next day or two I might even show the document to you (I’m out on Thursday, however) though I am reluctant to hand out copies at this stage. It is a document which raises some questions about the bona fides of the committee’s investigation, rather than about anything specific a certain former SecState might have done. If this is something that you would not want to get involved in, if you had any alternative ideas as to who I ought to speak to I would welcome them. Hope all is well etc.