Hot Mic – Reuters Intentionally Cuts Camera Feed During Positive Bishop Jackson Remarks To Trump i

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What's annoying is, after getting their black president, a mass movement of PC / SJW / BLM crazies with a race war agenda comes along; is backed by Obama/Hillary/Media; it divides the nation; it gets hot war with Islam running in the EU and on its way into the US...

Okay, but there is a need to remember back just a couple of years, IS, or ISIL had already attacked the US, and the UK, one of those who were the first to be killed was Jame Foley, before that 75 Syrian soldiers and more. After that there were Kurdish, Israeli, Lebanese, Afghans by the hundreds, Japanese and UK victims, and they kill their, 'own' to boot, never mind in the Phillipines years ago, and doing it again now. That is the reality, at least as we know it.
What you are saying dangerous, Islam is not IS, BLM is not IS.

What is obvious, is that nobody is safe, and if anybody thinks that a new President is going to make a difference, they better start reading good. I don't think that Trump is the man, he is belligerent by attacking Mexicans et al, making enemies as if they were IS, that's just stupid. Hillary, well it sounds much like Trump because the sound bytes are all ultimately about the economy. But that's what there is, that's all there is, and the truth is that there are no easy answers.

a reply to: RickyD

"Snowden of MEDIA" perhaps?

a reply to: six67seven

Yeah I think we're all getting frustrated here.

At this point it's not about getting Trump or Stein (The one I actually want elected) or anyone else elected anymore. It's about holding our electorate accountable. I'm now really in it for that alone now. I want Hillary and the MSM's "heads," I want accountability dammit.

That's my fight.

So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

So ... a feed was cut that showed (you think, after all, the feed was cut) Trump being "blessed" by the guy who invited him to the church (which was, about 9/10 empty)?

I'm sorry ... what gweat truth do some of you think was being "repressed" here by the eeevil media again?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Seriously? # her.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: IAMTAT

Seriously? # her.

Seriously.

lol
That's all I have to say, about that

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

What does this have to do with Trump's failed attempt at pandering to African Americans?

Or nominally, the great revelation that the cut in the broadcast feed was meant to prevent?

a reply to: Gryphon66

I agree actually odd place for it. Probably deserves it's own thread with links.

Still # her though.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

I agree actually odd place for it. Probably deserves it's own thread with links.

Still # her though.

Oh sure, # 'em all.

BTW, do you know what the big revelation was supposed to be that was "hidden" by the Reuters "cut feed" that is the nominal topic of this thread?

Was it the actual wording of a "blessing" by a Trump supporter, who happens to be Black?

Was that ... IT?

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

What does this have to do with Trump's failed attempt at pandering to African Americans?

Or nominally, the great revelation that the cut in the broadcast feed was meant to prevent?

This thread deals with press censoring a Presidential candidate. A Presidential candidate censoring the press is a related subject.
Also...Trump's visit and speech seemed very positive and effective. Being 'anointed' and 'Blessed' by a popular African-American Bishop...in the Democrat-generated, economic hell-hole of Detroit seems quite positive for him.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

What does this have to do with Trump's failed attempt at pandering to African Americans?

Or nominally, the great revelation that the cut in the broadcast feed was meant to prevent?

This thread deals with press censoring a Presidential candidate. A Presidential candidate censoring the press is a related subject.
Also...Trump's visit and speech seemed very positive and effective. Being 'anointed' and 'Blessed' by a popular African-American Bishop...in the Democrat-generated, economic hell-hole of Detroit seems quite positive for him.

So ... you're not dealing with the topic at all, just chiming in with another attempt to bash Clinton.

Trump's visit seemed positive and effective to whom? His buddy the Bishop and about 40 church members?

You "seem" to be using a lot of generic weasel-words, you want to claim that a blessing from one man is significant ... how? Particularly when most of his congregation REFUSED to participate?

What great positive message is this? "Some folks like Trump." Well, Duh.

Why would this be "hidden" from anyone? A sycophant is a sycophant.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Honestly, no idea. Which is kind of the point I think.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

Honestly, no idea. Which is kind of the point I think.

Right, the link was cut. The alleged material that was therefore "not witnessed" was a Trump supporter giving Trump his "blessing."

Again, what's the big deal?

Here is the full video for anyone interested:



The tech talk one can hear reveals some interesting behind the scenes info.

TAT, you ought to make a thread about the queen withholding herself from press conferences until after she is elected. It fits right in with the notion of passing the ACA so we can know what's in it.

a reply to: Gryphon66

It's a positive message for Trump, who's actually getting out there to get in touch with people, which Hillary is not doing even slightly.

I'm not really sure. I think there's a lot of trying to paint Trump in a bad light and not well liked, especially by the black community. And the idea is they're trying to prevent the furthering of a positive image of Trump in such a....

You get the idea...

Best I can do to answer that.

Either way the cutting out was weird and suspicious. Maybe they thought something else was gonna occur, who knows, the cut the feed before said event, who knows where they thought it was going.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

It's a positive message for Trump, who's actually getting out there to get in touch with people, which Hillary is not doing even slightly.

Horsepucks. Trump's trip to the church was the worst kind of racial pandering. The response of the congregation demonstrates that neither they, nor the larger Black community, apparently, are buying Trump's crap.

HIllary is not getting in touch with people? That's just silly rhetoric, and you know it.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm not really sure. I think there's a lot of trying to paint Trump in a bad light and not well liked, especially by the black community. And the idea is they're trying to prevent the furthering of a positive image of Trump in such a....

Trump is the most disliked Presidential candidate in history (followed closely of course by Clinton -- thought I'd save some of you the rabid typing). He's not being "painted" as being "not well liked" ... he isn't well liked. The Black community, by and large, doesn't like him. (94% unfavorable in many polls, as reported in The Hill.)

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

You get the idea...

Best I can do to answer that.

Sure I do ... this thread is a prime example of the general attempt among some to deny reality by a) overstating the importance of one man's opinion and b) alleging some grand conspiracy on the part of the media.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Gryphon66

Either way the cutting out was weird and suspicious. Maybe they thought something else was gonna occur, who knows, the cut the feed before said event, who knows where they thought it was going.

"Who knows?" indeed. That doesn't stop the assertions that this is something more than it is.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

What does this have to do with Trump's failed attempt at pandering to African Americans?

Or nominally, the great revelation that the cut in the broadcast feed was meant to prevent?

This thread deals with press censoring a Presidential candidate. A Presidential candidate censoring the press is a related subject.
Also...Trump's visit and speech seemed very positive and effective. Being 'anointed' and 'Blessed' by a popular African-American Bishop...in the Democrat-generated, economic hell-hole of Detroit seems quite positive for him.

You "seem" to be using a lot of generic weasel-words, you want to claim that a blessing from one man is significant ... how? Particularly when most of his congregation REFUSED to participate?

'Blessings' are 'Endorsements'...Are they not?
Candidates spend a great deal of effort to attain them...and once attained, they can be a positive thing for that candidate.

The man shown here, endorsing Trump through the bestowing of a Blessing...is a very good endorsement for Mr. Trump.
How is that arguable?
Do you feel this Bishop is a BAD endorsement for candidate Trump? If so, Why?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: IAMTAT
So now...Hillary just announced she will only hold a Press Conference...AFTER she's elected.

I wonder how the MSM feels about that.

What does this have to do with Trump's failed attempt at pandering to African Americans?

Or nominally, the great revelation that the cut in the broadcast feed was meant to prevent?

This thread deals with press censoring a Presidential candidate. A Presidential candidate censoring the press is a related subject.
Also...Trump's visit and speech seemed very positive and effective. Being 'anointed' and 'Blessed' by a popular African-American Bishop...in the Democrat-generated, economic hell-hole of Detroit seems quite positive for him.

You "seem" to be using a lot of generic weasel-words, you want to claim that a blessing from one man is significant ... how? Particularly when most of his congregation REFUSED to participate?

'Blessings' are 'Endorsements'...Are they not?
Candidates spend a great deal of effort to attain them...and once attained, they can be a positive thing for that candidate.

The man shown here, endorsing Trump through the bestowing of a Blessing...is a very good endorsement for Mr. Trump.
How is that arguable?
Do you feel this Bishop is a BAD endorsement for candidate Trump? If so, Why?

Yes, and the fact that Bishop Jackson invited Mr. Trump was proof of his endorsement.

Have I denied here that Jackson invited Mr. Trump? Or that didn't show an endorsement?

LOL no, I have not. Why are you trying to pivot this discussion to anything other than the topic???

The topic is that a feed was cut. The thread is alleging that this was done nefariously to "hide" something.

What was being hidden, I ask again? The answer is: nothing.

The church was almost empty. Bishop Jackson's admiration of DJT isn't apparently shared by much of his congregation.