It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whereislogic
originally posted by: nomoredemsorreps
Just take a look at the Lucis Trust. Here's an organization that is responsible for all PRINTING at the United Nations.
You're being led on a bit of a wild goose chase and it shows when you say (repeat?) wild exaggerated claims like that. All printing? Think about it for a moment and try to check how much is actually published by those working for the UN and which groups or organizations are doing the actual printing. It's a bit of a complicated issue as to what you're going to count as "printing at the United Nations", using your words. Lucifer Trust (or Lucis Trust) does their own printing and publishing. May I suggest their influence on the way humans think is not nearly as big as say...the Roman Catholic Hierarchy (or prominent influential Roman Catholics) or which is the next biggest one in Christendom (which is a part of Babylon the Great, the worldwide empire of false religion that rides the UN-beast in the book of Revelation)?
There's no mention of Lucis Trust on this page:
UNITED NATIONS DGACM
Apostolic Succession — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY:
Have the claimed successors to the apostles adhered to the teachings and practices of Jesus Christ and his apostles?
A Catholic Dictionary states: “The Roman Church is Apostolic, because her doctrine is the faith once revealed to the Apostles, which faith she guards and explains, without adding to it or taking from it.” (London, 1957, W. E. Addis and T. Arnold, p. 176) Do the facts agree?
Identity of God
...
Celibacy of the clergy
...
Separateness from the world
Pope Paul VI, when addressing the United Nations in 1965, said: “The peoples of the earth turn to the United Nations as the last hope of concord and peace; We presume to present here, together with Our own, their tribute of honor and of hope.”—The Pope’s Visit (New York, 1965), Time-Life Special Report, p. 26.
John 15:19, JB: “[Jesus Christ said:] If you belonged to the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you do not belong to the world, because my choice withdrew you from the world, therefore the world hates you.”
Jas. 4:4, JB: “Don’t you realise that making the world your friend is making God your enemy?”
Resorting to weapons of war
...
Will Religion Bring World Peace?
FROM August 28 to August 31, 2000, more than 500 representatives from 73 countries converged on New York City. They met together at the United Nations for “The Millennium World Peace Summit of Religious and Spiritual Leaders.” The leaders—many clad in turbans, saffron-colored robes, feather headdresses, or long black cloaks—represented a multitude of faiths. Among these were Baha’i, Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Jainism, Judaism, Shinto, Sikhism, Taoism, Zoroastrianism, and religions of Christendom.
The delegates met at the United Nations for the first two days of the four-day conference. However, the conference was not organized or funded by the United Nations but by various foundations. Nevertheless, both UN and religious leaders spoke of the importance of working together to bring an end to poverty, racism, environmental problems, war, and weapons of mass destruction.
The delegates signed a document entitled “Commitment to Global Peace.” While acknowledging that violence and war are “sometimes perpetrated in the name of religion,” the document declared that the signers would “collaborate with the United Nations . . . in the pursuit of peace.” There were, however, no specific resolutions indicating how this might be done.
On the second day, Bawa Jain, the secretary-general of the summit, concluded his opening remarks by explaining that some years earlier he had noticed a certain painting at the United Nations. The painting depicted a man taller than the United Nations Secretariat building. He was knocking on the building as if it were a door. Below the picture was the caption: “Prince of Peace.” Mr. Jain said: “[The picture] had a deep effect on me the moment I saw it. I asked different people what [it] meant. I think today I have the answer. The gathering of you all here, the spiritual and religious leaders of the world, demonstrates to me that [this] is the prince of peace knocking on the door of the United Nations.”
The Bible presents a different view. It shows that the Prince of Peace is Jesus Christ. He will bring global peace, not through the efforts of this world’s political or religious leaders, but by means of God’s Kingdom. It is this Kingdom—God’s heavenly government—that will successfully unite obedient mankind and cause God’s will to be done on earth.—Isaiah 9:6; Matthew 6:9, 10.
Sorry for going a little off-topic in trying to wake up those who think they're already awake (like when you're dreaming that you've woken up, hoping to create that moment where you'll begin to realize that something is up, something is so suspicious that it's suggestive that you're still dreaming).
you can print all the crap you want, and post whatever...
originally posted by: wizen
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
well done. I haven't checked details yet and may not be able to from this country.
Funny I haven't seen a response to you.
originally posted by: beachpeach
a reply to: nomoredemsorreps
Odd that you mentioned Project Camelot. Seems that we meet many like-minded folks in these places. I can totally relate to you when you mentioned that 6 years ago you would have thought someone crazy for believing these things, until you dove into the Building 7 collapse after constant encouragement. I was the same way until September 29, 2008 when I was thrown head first down the rabbit hole.
In the first week of my "awakening", I found Project Camelot, and began to follow them on their journey. I participated on their forum regularly. I decided to start a little group called American Revolution For Truth. I had a little wordpress blog site and a Talkshoe program. I interviewed Amy Vickers, who was at the time Lloyd Pye's assistant and Bob Dean. Then I interviewed Aaron McCollum, and things got really strange.
I started getting strange emails and phone calls, threatening me and my family, but also Aaron and his new wife. I was told that if I continued to be involved in exposing information that I would not be safe, nor would anyone that I love. That wrapped it up for me. I shut down my website and stopped the Talkshoe sessions. I have not participated in online discussion of any topics until I made an introduction on ATS, then replied to your OP here. Getting involved is scary, but I agree with what you said about being silent is being part of the problem. With people like yourself digging into the truth, I am slowly coming back out of my shell. I thank you for that.
In case anyone is interested, here's the link to my Talkshoe recordings Talkshoe American Revolution For Truth
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: beachpeach
Yeah, this whole ball of wax is something isn't it?
Once you open your eyes and see what they're capable of you find it hard to believe until you have a few personal experiences, and at that point it becomes more than frightening.
You, of course, know since you've poked your head back up, if you'd been off their radar since you shut down your blog you've negated that now. Nothing for it though.
The things done by those our leaders entrusted are beyond the comprehension of most. They can suspend their disbelief if it's presented in a movie (think Enemy of the State), but if they're actually asked to contemplate certain capabilities outside of a fictitious setting their mind shuts down.
As to the person whom is the topic of this thread, his story fits in with Gladio B type activities on American soil. If it weren't for the remarkable number of similarities between his story and other happenings across the country, one might almost be able to write him off as a loon.
But there are odd characteristic fingerprints at too many of the major events which have occurred in the United States, up to and including 9/11.
These point to some incredibly ruthless string pullers having their way in a more and more obvious manner than they have heretofore. It almost begs the question of if they don't care if their machinations are exposed, what do they know that might necessitate such over exposure and an acceleration of their plans?
Worse, there were numerous Italian politicians who were murdered because they were looking into this.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: nomoredemsorreps
Worse, there were numerous Italian politicians who were murdered because they were looking into this.
Like the Pope's secretary who died around the same time as Antonin Scalia under mysterious circumstances?
IIRC, she was may have been an important witness and was known as a gatekeeper to the Pope and several Bishops.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: nomoredemsorreps
Worse, there were numerous Italian politicians who were murdered because they were looking into this.
Like the Pope's secretary who died around the same time as Antonin Scalia under mysterious circumstances?
IIRC, she was may have been an important witness and was known as a gatekeeper to the Pope and several Bishops.
originally posted by: nomoredemsorreps
Pope Pius XII
originally posted by: starviego
Update on Howell:
"Howell's Preliminary Hearing is scheduled for September 8th at 8:30am at the DIV 31 (Airport Courthouse).
originally posted by: starviego
originally posted by: starviego
Update on Howell:
"Howell's Preliminary Hearing is scheduled for September 8th at 8:30am at the DIV 31 (Airport Courthouse).
He's disappeared again! No info whatsoever on any appearance yesterday by Howell at any Preliminary Hearing!
henrymakow.com...
"Howell's Preliminary Hearing is scheduled for September 8th at 8:30am at the DIV 31 (Airport Courthouse). He has obtained a public defender by the name Samuel Jones." "Howell is currently in the custody of the LA Sheriff's Department."