Hillary Clinton will be the BEST president!

originally posted by: intrepid
I guess it may be asking too much of Trump supporters to know what diplomacy is. Check it:

the art of dealing with people in a sensitive and effective way.
"his genius for tact and diplomacy"

synonyms: tact, tactfulness, sensitivity, discretion, subtlety, finesse, delicacy, savoir faire, politeness, thoughtfulness, care, judiciousness, prudence

www.google.ca...=diplomacy&gws_rd=cr

Check the synonyms. Does that sound like the Donald? Ya'll can keep yelling about it but that's point, set and match. You wanted one, you got one. You can ignore it but it doesn't change what the reader sees.

Cummon, be a sport. Give an argument.

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: intrepid
I guess it may be asking too much of Trump supporters to know what diplomacy is. Check it:

the art of dealing with people in a sensitive and effective way.
"his genius for tact and diplomacy"

synonyms: tact, tactfulness, sensitivity, discretion, subtlety, finesse, delicacy, savoir faire, politeness, thoughtfulness, care, judiciousness, prudence

www.google.ca...=diplomacy&gws_rd=cr

Check the synonyms. Does that sound like the Donald? Ya'll can keep yelling about it but that's point, set and match. You wanted one, you got one. You can ignore it but it doesn't change what the reader sees.

Cummon, be a sport. Give an argument.

I would be even more basic but my finger puppets are in the wash.

a reply to: Alien Abduct

Hillary will also:
1. Stop abortion by personally taking in all of the babies that might have otherwise been aborted.

Nope, that's Donald Trump and party.

Electing Donald Trump is electing the Republican Platform, which DOES seek to "stop" abortion, as well as intends to add a constitutional amendment, giving equal rights to embryos.

That alone is enough for me to vote against the Republican Platform and vote FOR Hillary Clinton's Democratic Platform..equal rights and autonomous reproductive rights, etc...

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: intrepid
I guess it may be asking too much of Trump supporters to know what diplomacy is. Check it:

the art of dealing with people in a sensitive and effective way.
"his genius for tact and diplomacy"

synonyms: tact, tactfulness, sensitivity, discretion, subtlety, finesse, delicacy, savoir faire, politeness, thoughtfulness, care, judiciousness, prudence

www.google.ca...=diplomacy&gws_rd=cr

Check the synonyms. Does that sound like the Donald? Ya'll can keep yelling about it but that's point, set and match. You wanted one, you got one. You can ignore it but it doesn't change what the reader sees.

Cummon, be a sport. Give an argument.

I would be even more basic but my finger puppets are in the wash.

But that's even more silly. Please? Your argument so far has been.


Hillary is better at diplomacy, therefore she should be president. Is that your argument? If it is I guess it's all I have to work with.

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enlightenedservant

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: intrepid
One word.... Trump. The GOP could have nominated a tree and beaten Hillary.

Give a rational argument for why Hillary is a better choice than Trump for president.

Really? Where to start? Diplomacy for one.

Sure everyone likes her flavor of diplomacy with all those countries she has overthrown.

Wait a second. Neither the Repubs nor Dems can fault the other for overthrowing govts. Because both sides do it when in power. In fact, most people on both "sides" act like pacifists are weak for not wanting to invade and overthrow other govts.

Is that deplomicy?

Of course not. I think both parties suck in that regard. I was just pointing out that Hillary's work towards overthrowing govts is literally the same as every other establishment candidate.

So when you said "Sure everyone likes her flavor of diplomacy with all those countries she has overthrown", it caught my eye. Because apparently most voters do love her policies in regards to overthrowing govts. Otherwise, they wouldn't keep supporting candidates from both sides that have the same policy.

This guy is voting for Trump...he doesn't have a rational argument...but he looking for a job building a wall.
Cheers

Hillary can't even fill a school gymnasium with supporters, while Trump fills stadiums with just as many waiting in the parking lots that cannot fit into the buildings.

Her support is fake.

originally posted by: JaMeDoIt
This guy is voting for Trump...he doesn't have a rational argument...but he looking for a job building a wall.
Cheers

That's so silly.

a reply to: Aristotelian1
All this time and Hillary supporters haven't given one rational argument.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: enlightenedservant

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: intrepid
One word.... Trump. The GOP could have nominated a tree and beaten Hillary.

Give a rational argument for why Hillary is a better choice than Trump for president.

Really? Where to start? Diplomacy for one.

Sure everyone likes her flavor of diplomacy with all those countries she has overthrown.

Wait a second. Neither the Repubs nor Dems can fault the other for overthrowing govts. Because both sides do it when in power. In fact, most people on both "sides" act like pacifists are weak for not wanting to invade and overthrow other govts.

Is that deplomicy?

Of course not. I think both parties suck in that regard. I was just pointing out that Hillary's work towards overthrowing govts is literally the same as every other establishment candidate.

So when you said "Sure everyone likes her flavor of diplomacy with all those countries she has overthrown", it caught my eye. Because apparently most voters do love her policies in regards to overthrowing govts. Otherwise, they wouldn't keep supporting candidates from both sides that have the same policy.

Apparently many do like that flavor but the topic is about Hillary not "sides" or the "other side". I disagree with her type of flavor no matter who is serving it.

originally posted by: Aristotelian1Somebody. Anybody. Give me an argument for why Hillary Clinton should should be president. Give me a rational argument.

Selection of Supreme Court Justices.

I despise Hillary. Deep in my bones. Edit: I'm not classified as a supporter. /edit

But no way, no how will I allow Trump that kind of control over 'making America great again'. I don't want the 1950s and neither do you.

I'll suffer one term of Clinton to make sure America isn't destroyed. And trust me, I will suffer... I can't believe I've acquiesced, but there's no options besides 'Dumb & Dumber' candidates. So for those Supreme Court Justices, I choose the Dumb candidate

a reply to: Jason88
Okay. Why do you think Hillary will pick better Supreme Court justices than Trump?

originally posted by: intrepid
I guess it may be asking too much of Trump supporters to know what diplomacy is. Check it:

There you go insinuating Trump supporters are stupid.

If diplomacy takes the cake over our national debt, poor economy, jobs, foreign wars, government corruption and waste then you should look in the mirror next time you call someone stupid.

originally posted by: Aristotelian1
a reply to: Aristotelian1
All this time and Hillary supporters haven't given one rational argument.

Trump says mean things :-(

a reply to: xstealth

Yahtzee!

In any discussion of Hillary's "Diplomacy", with her and her supporters the Big Story is about their own "Diplomacy" with their real world rivals. Labeling everyone that opposes them by stereotypes including racist (for merely opposing their positions, half the time) is about the worst "Diplomacy" I can think of outside of race war riots, mass murder, overthrowing governments and actual war.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: intrepid
One word.... Trump. The GOP could have nominated a tree and beaten Hillary.

Give a rational argument for why Hillary is a better choice than Trump for president.

Really? Where to start? Diplomacy for one.

Diplomacy for Clinton is for whoever will give her the most money.
You must have forgotten Teddy's famous quote "Talk softly and carry a big stick". Thats real diplomacy.
Negotiation should be more like Bruce Willis in the 5th Element
Peace

a reply to: Aristotelian1

Because I have no idea what he'll do or who he may pick. No one does. I'm a middle of the road guy - a fairly unpopular position to be in these days - but I have to go with predictability even if I hate it. Hillary is predictable, she'll tow the party line and pick Democratic leaning justices, she may even pick moderate Republican justices to appease the House, that's fine.

Trump... who knows. Does he really go in the conservative direction especially now that he's lost their support? Does he revisit his Democrat roots like he has recently and go liberal? Who knows. It's a wild card.

Clinton gets one term - God forgive me - then we pick someone Presidential that most of us can stomach.

a reply to: Jason88

Her Corruption is entirely predictable. WELL established history.

Trump's Corruption Quotient is mostly pure speculation, while we know the Ruling Establishment's news outlets LOATHE him while LOVING her.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Jason88

Her Corruption is entirely predictable. WELL established history.

Trump's Corruption Quotient is mostly pure speculation, while we know the Ruling Establishment's news outlets LOATHE him while LOVING her.

Yup, her corruption is well established. We know her paymasters, her loyalties, and her general awfulness. She's a professional politician & mob boss rolled into one. But, nothing will change for the worse. She'll get richer, so will her cronies, good people will die, and we'll generally all be dead inside for 4 years.

Trump is a wild card. I can't chance that, I like America too much to be that risky.

I choose evil over very unknown in this scenario. Again, not a popular position... Obviously.

a reply to: Jason88

Trump will pick conservative judges, but I guess that's your problem, you want liberal judges. He has released his list of judges to choose from.

Trump hasn't lost support of conservatives, rinos and establishment republicans who's donors told them not to support him; but conservatives support him.

So you are willing to continue the Bush Clinton dynasty because your scared of change. I think that mass mentality is far more dangerous to our future than a few judges.