It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Other researchers are cautious about the result, but if it stands further scrutiny, the finding would overturn the most fundamental rule of modern physics—that nothing travels faster than 299,792,458 meters per second.
Neutrinos rarely interact with ordinary matter, and they easily pass through solids that would screen out most other particles. So neutrino beams could be used to send messages through the Earth, or to communicate with a planetary rover parked on the far side of Mars, out of radio contact.
What we do not see, however, is that the universe is filled with particles called neutrinos. These particles — have no charge and have little or no mass — created less than one second after the Big Bang, and large numbers of these primordial low-energy neutrinos remain in the universe today because they interact very weakly with matter.
Since nothing is just empty space or vacuum, it can expand faster than light speed since no material object is breaking the light barrier," said theoretical astrophysicist Michio Kaku on Big Think. "Therefore, empty space can certainly expand faster than light.
It was at this point (the vanishing of the Eldridge) that the true power of the electromagnetic field that had been created was revealed. The Eldridge had not only vanished from the view of observers in Philadelphia, it had vanished from Philadelphia all together! The ship had been instantly transported several hundred miles - from Philadelphia to Norfolk, Virginia. After a few minutes, the ship once again vanished, to return to Philadelphia.
This in essence is the baffling question. We are mass, our spaceships are mass, everything we do, is mass. So my first query was to find something that contain no mass.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: BlackProject
I don't think it's possible for humans to travel at this speed (or time travel), but I am not master of sub-atomic particles or physics...
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: BlackProject
This in essence is the baffling question. We are mass, our spaceships are mass, everything we do, is mass. So my first query was to find something that contain no mass.
The spirit. But that science is denied by science.
New Project Plans To Send A Spacecraft To Alpha Centauri In 20 Years
A new project has been announced that will attempt to launch a small spacecraft to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri, and return images and data to Earth within a generation.
The ambitious proposal called Breakthrough Starshot was revealed today by billionaire Yuri Milner, Professor Stephen Hawking, and a host of other scientists and experts. The $100 million research project will seek to prove a proposed concept for interstellar travel, using a tiny satellite with a large laser-powered sail, with a plan to launch a mission to Alpha Centauri in the near future.
“Today, we commit to this next great leap into the cosmos,” said Hawking at a press conference today. “Because we are human, and our nature is to fly.”
originally posted by: boncho
a reply to: BlackProject
They are planning a project to Alpha Centuri right now, though its not light speed (it doesn't need to be)...It'll get there in 20 years.
New Project Plans To Send A Spacecraft To Alpha Centauri In 20 Years
A new project has been announced that will attempt to launch a small spacecraft to our nearest stellar neighbor, Alpha Centauri, and return images and data to Earth within a generation.
The ambitious proposal called Breakthrough Starshot was revealed today by billionaire Yuri Milner, Professor Stephen Hawking, and a host of other scientists and experts. The $100 million research project will seek to prove a proposed concept for interstellar travel, using a tiny satellite with a large laser-powered sail, with a plan to launch a mission to Alpha Centauri in the near future.
“Today, we commit to this next great leap into the cosmos,” said Hawking at a press conference today. “Because we are human, and our nature is to fly.”
There are other designs too, and various theoretical designs of ships which can carry humans. Some need advances in anti-matter and fusion to be viable, but once they are they will be able to travel to 99%/C.
As far as FTL, until they disclose all the missing documents from the 50s-90s UFO era, Im not entirely convinced humans don't already have something that may break our current understanding of physics. Whether its an actual vehicle that travels time/space or something that works in different dimensions, or whatever.... Some think disclosure rests on the fact they can't figure it out...
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: BlackProject
Thanks. And I can't go all into stuff anymore like hypercubes, other dimensions, everywhere, everywhen, without dragging the thread off topic.
So I won't. I juts left that spirit notion of light travel.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: BlackProject
Personally I think the speed of light is the cosmic speed limit, but that doesn't mean there aren't ways to circumvent it. The alcubierre drive is one that makes sense, and wouldn't violate our known laws of physics.
originally posted by: Toolman18
Particles can be linked and will have information given to one particle instantaneously be matched in the paired particle no matter the distance. Instant. Space-time isn't a factor. This is how I believe we can go faster than the speed of light. We just have to figure it out.
If I have two electrons close together, they can vibrate in unison, according to the quantum theory. If I then separate them, an invisible umbilical cord emerges which connects the two electrons, even though they may be separated by many light years. If I jiggle one electron, the other electron "senses" this vibration instantly, faster than the speed of light.
originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: BlackProject
"So my first query was to find something that contain no mass."
That's easy to answer but maybe a tad difficult to acquire that "something."
That something is nothing less that an alien UFO and maybe one of our secret triangle "UFOS" if our space force will allow you to borrow one.
Really, this is one of those dozens of threads on ATS that ignore the evidence and loves to speculate about what science will maybe do some day.
Take any decent, credible UFO sighting you wish, and there are many, and plot it out for what it did and how it did it. Every single credible UFO sighting will display characteristics of having a massless state. --None will give evidence of wings, jets or props! That simple, elementary scientific-derived step of determination of source is never done.