Army Training Lesson Cited Clinton as 'Insider' Threat Risk

This must be a first, to have a Presidential candidate
listed in a training lesson as a threat to The United States!

From NBC news! Another day, another you can't make this stuff up.

An Army training presentation on insider threats included Hillary Clinton among a rogue's gallery of killers and leakers, citing the former secretary of state as an example of "careless or disgruntled employees," NBC News confirmed on Tuesday.

The unclassified slide, which first emerged on a Facebook page that spoofs the military, was confirmed by a U.S.
military officials, who said it was used as part of a lesson on how to secure classified materials and improve safety.

A spokesperson from the Army's Training and Doctrine Command said the slide was developed 18 months ago.

www.nbcnews.com...

Yeah, this is real, not a spoof ...crazy. Or not so crazy, knowing Hillary.

There she is, right under Snowden, and the sailor who
carried out The Navy Yard Shooting!


Full image from The Daily Caller
dailycaller.com...

An Army training presentation lists the woman who could be
the next commander in chief as an insider threat, underneath the
sailor who carried out the Navy Yard shooting.
americanveterancoalition.org...

Now there is really a gem buried there, this was developed 18 months ago?

How long ago was it that Clinton's email story broke?

Oh this is great.

Former SoS running for President and is a "careless or disgruntled employee".

Jesus.

originally posted by: xuenchen

Former SoS running for President and is a "careless or disgruntled employee".

Well, the FBI confirmed it, she was "extremely careless".
They had sights on her long ago.

Hillary -ous

I forget. How many years had it been since a US Ambassador had been killed at his post before Hillary?

And, all that willful destruction of correspondence that belonged to the real record. What was she trying to hide?

a reply to: Snarl

Adolph Dubs, under Carter.
1979 -
Stevens -2012

33 years ago?

National Security matters.

Poor Ed Snowden, being compared to Hillary like that.

Indications that some government agencies (factions against Obama etc) are on to the whole anti-American/Global agendas.

They might actually be operating in the best interests of the average Citizen imo.

I'm thinking Comey's move was actually good because he could not have publicized all the now known info if he had announced a recommendation to prosecute.

He would have had to keep 100% quiet with any details.

originally posted by: xuenchen

I'm thinking Comey's move was actually good because he could not have publicized all the now known info if he had announced a recommendation to prosecute.

He would have had to keep 100% quiet with any details.

True, he would have passed it off to that gal who
met with Bill on a private jet. And that would have
been the end of it.

No one would believe this if it were part of a movie plot, yet here we are with it in real life.

And yet, she still has support?

a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting take. I still don't trust the guy though. Of course, the School of Hard Knocks taught me never to put too much trust into people who were smarter'n me ... and Comey's a whole lot smarter.

originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: xuenchen

Interesting take. I still don't trust the guy though. Of course, the School of Hard Knocks taught me never to put too much trust into people who were smarter'n me ... and Comey's a whole lot smarter.

I don't trust him 100% either.

But he does have to swim in the same water with the higher-ups.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
No one would believe this if it were part of a movie plot, yet here we are with it in real life.

And yet, she still has support?

It just goes to show you the level of garbage citizenry and how it has been led right down the path alongside the perpetrators of this kind of destruction of America. People are willingly selling their own souls to support this level of trash.

They aren't wrong.

As I said in many threads before this one, the IA training we go through is mandatory and the consequences are spelled out clearly.

They only apply to us lowly soldiers though.

a reply to: projectvxn

Thankfully, hopefully most like you will maintain
the ethics code, even if led by her.

That sure seems like it would be a very difficult
position for those who serve....

a reply to: burntheships

This also makes me wonder what other sorts of training might surround the possibility of a Hillary presidency.

Might there be a training seminar somewhere around the potential need to remove a sitting president under circumstances in which Congress decides to do nothing in the face of a blatant and obvious threat due to a willful or unintended act?

originally posted by: projectvxn
They aren't wrong.

As I said in many threads before this one, the IA training we go through is mandatory and the consequences are spelled out clearly.

They only apply to us lowly soldiers though.

Aren't soldiers sworn to protect America from all its enemies both foreign and domestic, rather than blog about them?

a reply to: burntheships

Also from the article...

A spokesperson from the Army's Training and Doctrine Command said the slide was developed 18 months ago.

"As is common with Army training requirements, the local unit was given latitude to develop their own training products to accomplish the overall training objective," the spokesperson said in a statement.

"This particular presentation had not been reviewed or approved by the unit's leadership, and does not reflect the position of the Army. The training presentation has since been removed."

A U.S. military official told NBC News that the slide — with a header reading "Who is the threat? Insiders" — was used at at Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri.

Yeah. Absolutely NO CHANCE it was a political opinion by one of the Fort Leonard Wood unit members in Missouri? Or that it was a joke?

If it was from the CIA or the NSA or Homeland I would be worried.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: burntheships

This also makes me wonder what other sorts of training might surround the possibility of a Hillary presidency.

I don't doubt that this lesson material was also in other
forces. Perhaps even other agencies....

The fact alone that this was issued 18 months ago, and finally
made its way to the public eye is telling,

As to the last query, that is pretty sensitive,
I cant speak to that, but maybe someone will
come along that can.

originally posted by: AboveBoard

If it was from the CIA or the NSA or Homeland I would be worried.

You dont know that it isn't/was not.

And you would never know.

But James Comey dropped a few hints.

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: burntheships

Yeah. Absolutely NO CHANCE it was a political opinion by one of the Fort Leonard Wood unit members in Missouri? Or that it was a joke?

If it was from the CIA or the NSA or Homeland I would be worried.

Maybe the guy has higher level information and already knows Hillary is "on the lists".

Probably just a careless reckless mistake with no intended consequences.