It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ntech
originally posted by: atrollstalker
Let's be fair about this.
Why does the anti-Christ have to be a man?
Could it be a blonde woman who wears pant suits everywhere?
As much as a certain blondish woman seems to fit the prophesy the problem is that the Antichrist is supposed to be a man. However I'll go one farther. If the prophesies of Daniel are repeating like I think they are then the Antichrist is supposed to be an American. And is possibly well known already. A American politician most likely at present.
However he would be the 3rd ruler of the kingdom of the north which appears to be a NATO type confederacy of European and North American nations.
originally posted by: ABissell
Boo! What is this anti-doom porn? Pun intended So you are so weird in your wording like most predictors. Is this speculation or something you honestly believe to truly happen?
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: schuyler
It does suck. It is also the attitude that lead us to the French Revolution which is how Napoleon was allowed to come to power.
Hmmm, so Anti-Christ anyone? Your "power to the people" schtick may be just the door he needs. What better way to rise to power than over the bloodiest world wide revolt and collapse of systems ever? And then all will look to him as the new messiah and savior who brought peace to all.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: TheChuckster
Bout time I say because this dude is clearly late to the party! Ok, I'll pick up ice & chips. What are you guys bringing?
originally posted by: atrollstalker
Let's be fair about this.
Why does the anti-Christ have to be a man?
Could it be a blonde woman who wears pant suits everywhere?
originally posted by: SanitySearcher
a reply to: TheChuckster
Oh God...another Ron Weinland wannabe
originally posted by: Watcher1207
You said it... "The church" just keeps the multitudes scared and in line institutionally according to society of the time. It's really sad!a reply to: TheChuckster
originally posted by: Vroomfondel
originally posted by: ntech
originally posted by: atrollstalker
Let's be fair about this.
Why does the anti-Christ have to be a man?
Could it be a blonde woman who wears pant suits everywhere?
As much as a certain blondish woman seems to fit the prophesy the problem is that the Antichrist is supposed to be a man. However I'll go one farther. If the prophesies of Daniel are repeating like I think they are then the Antichrist is supposed to be an American. And is possibly well known already. A American politician most likely at present.
However he would be the 3rd ruler of the kingdom of the north which appears to be a NATO type confederacy of European and North American nations.
In my best Austin Powers voice, "You have to admit, she is rather man-ish..."
originally posted by: atrollstalker
Let's be fair about this.
Why does the anti-Christ have to be a man?
Could it be a blonde woman who wears pant suits everywhere?
Rev 17:8 “The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to come up out of the abyss and go to destruction
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: TheChuckster
Dude...I tried, but I can't sit here and listen to that man butcher those beautiful languages like that. It sounds like he's possessed by at least three functionally illiterate demons who are also afflicted with one hell of a case of Tourette's, and might also be inebriated as well.
I just have one question. What does August 30 have to do with any of this? I just spent minutes of my existence that I cannot ever get back, willfully subjecting myself to this linguistic nightmare...not to mention all that talk about *shudder* church, with its accompanying risk of bursting into flames (I swear I smelled smoke), seeking the answer to that single question, and failed in my endeavor. Please, I beseech you...help a sista out...why that date?
By the by...if this was already asked and answered, my apologies in advance.
originally posted by: ntech
a reply to: NumberMan
One problem with your conclusion there. According to the book of Zechariah the Lord is accompanied by two companions he calls the branches. And each branch is predicted to build a temple. We're still one temple short. And Matthew 24 is explicit that the time of the end has the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not to be. And that is referring to Daniel 11-31.
And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.
And if he is referring to 11-31 then that means he is also telling us that all of Daniel 11 must repeat. It is the story line that leads up to the placement of the abomination and the events that follow. Even verse 11-6 states these events happen at the end of years.
So to conclude both Jesus Christ and Daniel are stating a desecrated Jewish temple exists in the end times.