FBI papers reveal that Hillary Clinton did not mislead Congress, but was 'extremely careless'

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: butcherguy

Did I stutter? I truly don't trust a Trump Presidency with his thin skin.

There are other people that are not Trump and are not proven to be corrupt in the race.

Neither of those two people will win the race. So I'd rather not siphon votes away from Clinton and possibly help Trump win. I'm all for voting third party, but only when the main candidates aren't lunatics.

Into the ground,maybe.

Would 4 more years of Obama REALLY kill you? I mean try answering that question honestly for a change.

It might kill quite a few of us considering his lighthearted stance on radical Islam and the 30,000 refugees we took in recently with more expected to get a pass as well. Look how well that's going for Europe.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

What an amazing coincidental accident then.

To be able to lie, cheat and deceive, without even trying to do it?
That's incredible. She deserves a medal. Not the presidency, though.

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: butcherguy

Did I stutter? I truly don't trust a Trump Presidency with his thin skin.

There are other people that are not Trump and are not proven to be corrupt in the race.

Neither of those two people will win the race. So I'd rather not siphon votes away from Clinton and possibly help Trump win. I'm all for voting third party, but only when the main candidates aren't lunatics.

Into the ground,maybe.

Would 4 more years of Obama REALLY kill you? I mean try answering that question honestly for a change.

It might kill quite a few of us considering his lighthearted stance on radical Islam and the 30,000 refugees we took in recently with more expected to get a pass as well. Look how well that's going for Europe.

We'll be fine. I've already addressed this nonsense rhetoric in the thread. The only problem here is your irrational fear of the Muslim religion.

Lmao!! I think maybe you should sit this one out. As you stated previously:

"Neither of those two people will win the race. So I'd rather not siphon votes away from Clinton and possibly help Trump win. I'm all for voting third party, but only when the main candidates aren't lunatics."

If you don't want Trump to win and you're willing to ignore Hillary's crimes against the nation and STILL support her regardless, what the F does that say about YOU? What are your morals and values? Obviously, they are INLINE with hers! The simple solution for your internal dilemma is to note vote for either. At least you can walk away with a well deserved clear conscious... unlike Hillary.

a reply to: EternalShadow

I don't care what you think about me for my voting choice. My conscious is also clear for doing it. If you want to hate me, knock yourself out. Not that I thought you had that high of an opinion of me in the first place anyways.

a reply to: introvert

It IS a matter of belief, either a person believes that " i didn`t mean to" is an acceptable excuse for a high level government employee to use to defend their careless and reckless handling of classified material, or a person believes that that isn`t acceptable.

Personally I believe that its never acceptable for a non mentally challenged adult to use the excuse " I didn`t mean to" to excuse a deliberate and conscious choice on their part to do something criminal or unethical or immoral or...

If a person believes that "i didn`t mean to" is an acceptable excuse for a high government official to use to excuse their, deliberate,careless and reckless handling of classified information, then that person would also have to believe that "i didn`t mean to" is an acceptable excuse or defense for any crime, for any unethical actions, any immoral actions.
To believe that jeopardizing the countries classified secrets is less of an offense than a petty misdemeanor would strongly indicate that a persons reasoning skills are borderline retarded.
no amount of justifying or rationalizing will ever make a non mentally challenged adult believe that " i didn`t mean too" is an acceptable defense for a high level government official to use.

Personally I want my government officials to be of higher calibre than a 6 year old,even a 6 year old uses that excuse.
I don`t want my government officials, who hold so much power and responsibility, to be held to the same standards as a 6 year old.
we the people grant our government officials a lot of power but in exchange for that power we hold them to a higher standard and higher level of responsibility.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Even though it's proven that she knowingly lied to Congress and to the people of the USA.

Proven by whom?

Herself. One off the top of my head:

When she claimed that her lawyers read every single email - it was a lie. They used a search function and went by Header information.

So, if you claim that your lawyers read every single email in it's entirety, and it is proven that your lawyers did not in fact read every email in it's entirety, it means you lied.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

They did'nt reveal anything, they just decided it was careless. My logic insists that lying is illegal(in those curcumstances) and misleading, careless is leaving your phone on a train.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Even though it's proven that she knowingly lied to Congress and to the people of the USA.

Proven by whom?

Well since Comey has been bought and paid for can we believe his words?

They have recording of her testfying under oath and compared them to other times. she was lying under oath.

This countrys broken. i hope the stormtroopers break down all you sheeps doors one day So i can tell you i told you so. So when you all cry up asking for help to pull you back from the brink ill simply look down and say no.(and yes i know its not word for word Sue me)

"Extemely Careless"Wonderful qualities for the leader of the free world.Lord help us all.

originally posted by: chuck258

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Even though it's proven that she knowingly lied to Congress and to the people of the USA.

Proven by whom?

Herself. One off the top of my head:

When she claimed that her lawyers read every single email - it was a lie. They used a search function and went by Header information.

So, if you claim that your lawyers read every single email in it's entirety, and it is proven that your lawyers did not in fact read every email in it's entirety, it means you lied.

It also means they would be reading classified material without clearance, another big no no by hillary.
Why that wasn't pursued, I have no idea.

The dems had their turn at bat the last 8 yrs.
Struck out and Krazyshot, would it kill anyone to get hillary out of politics?

As others pointed out, why lower the bar with a known liar and shady character like hillary?

What's next, "oh, he wasn't the boss of the cartel, just a hitman." ?

I voted for Bill and was impressed how hard he was campaigning. Really busting his ass out on the trail.
Hillary needs a day's rest after a softball interview. She doesn't have what it would take, she is frail and sick in body and has brain and morality issues.
She's over the hill.

Tardacus nails it also.

I don't get it, "an extremely careless" potus is ok?

originally posted by: imthegoat

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

We were already told by the FBI director that a corrupted, lying criminal was just extremely careless.

Even though it's proven that she knowingly lied to Congress and to the people of the USA.

A criminal by the very definition needs to be convicted of a crime. Using the term when the person hasn't been convicted of a crime (as people on ATS constantly did around Obama as well) isn't big, or clever, it's just rhetoric without any facts.

In the definition of "criminal" no where does it say anything about being convictes. Hence the phrase "convicted criminal." Try again.

criminal (ˈkrɪmɪnəl)
n
1. (Law) a person charged with and convicted of crime

www.thefreedictionary.com...

Hope that doesn't make you feel in anyway stupid.

Can anyone explain why the FBI report would be classified? If there was no crime, no national security problem with Hillary, why is it classified? The public has the right to know

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Even though it's proven that she knowingly lied to Congress and to the people of the USA.

Proven by whom?

Well since Comey has been bought and paid for can we believe his words?

You have evidence of this? I don't think you do. I think you are just making this up because you don't like his decision. You do know that Comey is a Republican who was appointed by the Bush administration right?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Who knows? As a veteran of the military

Yeah me too, but you couldn't get a waiver for this stuff.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

You have evidence of this?

Oh please, as if evidence would convince you. You would simply dismiss the evidence, just like you do in the case of Hillary.

a reply to: TheBulk

I'm not going to apologize for having a higher standard of evidence than you.

a reply to: TheBulk

OH of course he would ask for evidence of this even though Comeys own actions make him untrustworthy by changing a statutes wording just for his master hillary clinton and his other master Obama. And you are right even IF i had evidence he would say thats fake or co ersed. You cant prove the truth to someone who willingly does not care.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk

I'm not going to apologize for having a higher standard of evidence than you.

Snerk Standards.. lol.

a reply to: yuppa

Yeah. God forbid we deny ignorance and don't just blindly believe whatever we read on the internet or anything. It's so funny how y'all are eating your own to maintain your rhetoric. I mean the GOP is fracturing apart thanks to Trump. Now you are baselessly accusing Comey of being bought out by liberals, and you say it like it is obvious (it isn't).

It's like I'm watching the 5 stages of grief in live action.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: yuppa

Yeah. God forbid we deny ignorance and don't just blindly believe whatever we read on the internet or anything. It's so funny how y'all are eating your own to maintain your rhetoric. I mean the GOP is fracturing apart thanks to Trump. Now you are baselessly accusing Comey of being bought out by liberals, and you say it like it is obvious (it isn't).

It's like I'm watching the 5 stages of grief in live action.

You said you are trolling all threads now SO anything you say has no weight attached to it anymore. Go to 4 chan im sure they will listen to you there.