Mandela Effect - Switch Back Proof - Houston, We Have A Problem

originally posted by: roadgravel
I am wondering if in your video posted (the effect one) the maker edited the line from one video I listened to by removing the "Ing" from "interviewing".

She says interview with a vampire..

if you add in ing she says:

Interviewing with a vampire

makes no sense. Did you even watch it?

And I'm telling you point blank it was interview with a vampire. It was brought up a million times to me..

Why do you think google with a clear internet cache and not logged in or tracked by anything does this:

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
The movie gets it wrong, it uses the pop culture misquote.
www.filmsite.org...

I thought I read somewhere that the film producers/writers changed it intentionally to emphasize the immediacy of the drama, and bring the audience in with the astronauts. I don't have a problem with this--they are making a film, not an archive.

I don't either. My problem is the shoddy journalism.

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: Darkinsider

I just find it interesting. The man who said it, disputes the quotes attributed to him, and the only witness there with him, backs him up. Aldrin has agreed with what Armstrong has said many times.

In total, Armstrong said, after putting down his foot, "That's one small step for a man," (meaning himself, as he put his foot down), "one giant leap for mankind."

It is logical and makes sense exactly the way Armstrong said it. The transmission to Earth had noise during the "a" of "a man", but Aldrin heard him clearly say what he said.

I agree totally. But, the quote is continually misquoted, leaving the a out. Hence the Mandela Effect. Just go to google and type in Neil Armstrongs first words............and you'll see an infinity of interpretations.

Cheers

KD

a reply to: Darkinsider

Find me real proof not based on peoples faulty memories you goose.

It's quite obvious you guys are remembering it wrong as the audio proves he said man, not a man.

originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: Darkinsider

Find me real proof not based on peoples faulty memories you goose.

It's quite obvious you guys are remembering it wrong as the audio proves he said man, not a man.

The audio is only what got sent back to Earth and was audible. Armstrong said the "a" never transmitted and was never heard. The audio never had an "a" in it.

Nothing changed.

Please explain what his words would mean with no "a" in it.

a reply to: Reverbs

I was saying the "ing" could be removed and the phrase constructed in her voice.

If the change actually occurred, why would here even be one with her using "a". That's not this timeline. It points to some other explanation.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Please don't make me break character.

I don't know how you got so off base, but I'm not being serious.

I'm being YOU.



and now you are making excuses about why you can't prove the truth.
you are only basing what you think reality is on a man's faulty memory.

You see I know he said a man as well..
I just admit how I know it.
It's the same way I know it was "Interview with a Vampire."

You are fine relying on an old mans memory, which is obviously false (please I'm kidding don't get confused again)
but you can't see your hypocrisy can you?

a reply to: roadgravel

Here you are sir..

Found where the audio video comes from..

You can clearly see the words on the video.. they do not match just let her tell you herself.

youtu.be...
"In the Shadow of the Vampire - The making of Interview with the Vampire (part 1) "
the link is to the correct time in the video when Anne Rice starts speaking let it go for a few sentences to get to "Interview with a vampire"

remember please Armstrong said a man not man.. The author of a book knows her book title at least as well as a man on the moon knows what he said.

If you guys had seen forbes and new york times articles change before your very eyes you might have more of a dog in this fight.
Something about this whole ME business is VERY fishy.

can't call me lazy, but I don't want to do all the work for you guys haha.
You either care or you don't.
But I can read bias from a mile away and I will play more than devils advocate if the mood fits.

originally posted by: Reverbs

You are fine relying on an old mans memory

And English grammar that necessitates an "a".

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Reverbs

You are fine relying on an old mans memory

And English grammar that necessitates an "a".

no it doesn't.

Leading with bias again..

man can be used as a plurality..

WAtch any documentary on evolution.. You will hear "the evolution of man"

not "a man"

you are still in the wrong argument as we both agree on what he said.

I'm trying to get you to see you are basing that on a man's memory..



You are picking and choosing how you wish to view reality based on memories you deem are correct and those you deem are incorrect in some strange logical fallacy where you can somehow cut through your own faulty memory and it must be THEM who got it wrong.

It would be tiring if I chased my own tail with you, but I'm only proving a point. Trying.. But bias is hard to get people to see. Maybe impossible in this case?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Wait, is it Mandela Effect or Mandela Affect?

Wait, it's definitely not Mandala...

My brain just exploded.

originally posted by: Reverbs

no it doesn't.

Leading with bias again..

man can be used as a plurality..

WAtch any documentary on evolution.. You will hear "the evolution of man"

not "a man"

you are still in the wrong argument as we both agree on what he said.

I'm trying to get you to see you are basing that on a man's memory..

You realize you just proved my argument right?

One small step for man is PLURAL unless you add an "a".

In effect that would make his statement read ...

One small step for mankind, one giant leap for mankind.

Without the "a" the statement makes zero sense due to man becoming plural. Thank you for proving my argument for me.

a reply to: imjack

The effect of Mandela playing Lazarus is brutal, affecting all they held as sacred.
Much panic ensues.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

LOL

"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" is quite poetic actually.

We both know that's not what he said.

a reply to: Reverbs

Found where the audio video comes from.. You can clearly see the words on the video.. they do not match just let her tell you herself.

It's hard to tell what see says. it might a "a".

Go to 2:50 minutes into the video and she what she calls it.

a reply to: roadgravel

I hear a both times but I'm expecting to hear a.. It doesn't help the word before "a" or "the" ends in "th"
I'm expecting to hear a because that's what it was called when I was made to watch it in 10th grade. That was a long time ago but we talked about it for weeks in class. It's ingrained in my memory.

I'd like to hear what more people have to say about it though.

Thanks for listening.



Here is the link again for anyone else to join in:

youtu.be...

originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

LOL

"One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" is quite poetic actually.

We both know that's not what he said.

Sounds great, but when man is plural the meaning is removed.

a reply to: Reverbs

I think at that point it might be a slip. She has been talking in the context of her idea of interviewing a vampire. So she uses "a" possibly. Later she uses the correct phase when mentioning the title for the movie/screenplay.

originally posted by: Reverbs
a reply to: Darkinsider

Find me real proof not based on peoples faulty memories you goose.

It's quite obvious you guys are remembering it wrong as the audio proves he said man, not a man.

This goose is not ready for cooking. LOL All I am saying is that ah......forget it.....LOL 'nuff said. Armstrong/Aldrin say the quote is and what was said on the surface of the moon was "one small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind. The NASA transcripts also verify this....but agreed......all video's recordings I have heard, do not catch the A

cheers

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

Sounds great, but when man is plural the meaning is removed.

No the meaning is this:

the feat of getting to the moon is a small step for man,
the meaning of it is a giant leap for man kind.

I'm not saying that it doesn't make more sense with the a,
but that's how all these mandela effects go..
Faulty memory because subconsciously your brain hears what it wants to hear.
I don't think you are hearing me.

I'm a bit of an anomaly.. Trying to prove both sides at once. Figure it should give me the quickest path to truth.
You are making me play one side as a double agent when I would rather not be sarcastic to prove a point.