It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: tothetenthpower
Nuclear codes are not static, and if they are, that's a giant security failure. They are probably on encrypted keys that change all the time.
And no Aide would have access to nuclear codes, only POTUS does. He doesn't even have access.
I dunno why he'd have said something so foolish but it can't possibly be true.
~Tenth
Yes I am ignorant of nuclear protocols, or even what nuclear code do to be honest. But given that Biden was railing against Trump for his untrustworthiness around nuclear codes, I am left wondering if this sort of thing is normal.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Nuclear codes are not static, and if they are, that's a giant security failure. They are probably on encrypted keys that change all the time.
And no Aide would have access to nuclear codes, only POTUS does. He doesn't even have access.
I dunno why he'd have said something so foolish but it can't possibly be true.
~Tenth
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Someone sent me this little piece of irony here.
Biden, in his speech about Trump being unqualified to access nuclear codes, exposes aide who knows the nuclear codes to a crowd of Hilary fans.
I'm not American so I do not understand the gravity of what Biden does here, but I'm guessing it is somewhat of a security risk to point out to a crowd of people a military aide who knows the nuclear codes. To any military men and women who may have better insight on the topic, does this present a risk to not only the military aide, but to the country itself?
Or is this all par for the course?