It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: TheBulk
More like he says things sane people don't like.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: SallieSunshine
Well Trump is always stepping in it
No, he says things liberals and left wingers don't like and since the press is leftist and liberals, they make huge deals about everything, while doing exactly the opposite in regards to Democrats and Hillary. You are cool with this because you too are a left winger and agree with the media and it's agenda.
That's one of the reasons I keep saying left wingers are dangerous. You guys are rationalizing increasingly more extreme positions. Is there a limit to what you'll rationalize?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable
You got a source for that claim?
But anyone thinking Hillary Clinton will cruise to a crushing win might want to look back eight more years, to 1988. About this time 28 years ago, Massachusetts Gov. Mike Dukakis had what appeared to be an insurmountable lead over then-Vice President George H. W. Bush. He came out of his Democratic National Convention at the end of July with a 17-point lead.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable
First off, here's the source that article is referencing:
Dukakis Lead Widens, According to New Poll
Second off, that article is dated July and is directly referencing Dukakis' post convention bounce. You stated he was this far ahead in August. Well that's incorrect because at this point in an election convention bounces have already faded (which is the case for Hillary's post convention bounce).
originally posted by: SallieSunshine
I listen to NPR radio in my car to and from work. It has been nothing but "Hillary Good" "Trump Bad" since they both got the nominations from their parties. Very, very biased- and this coming from me- a person who actually made a donation to NPR last year and who is a regular listener. It is so bad that I seriously doubt I will be making any more contributions to them in the future. Seriously, I am embarrassed for them and their total lack of journalistic integrity.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
What a shame when a taxpayer funded, supposedly non-partisan organization is willing to fudge numbers to make one candidate look better than the other. If you listen to NPR all you ever hear are the voices of the left, minorities and the LGBT crowd. Conservatives are never given a voice and anything remotely Christian is avoided like the plague.
Flip the numbers and you will have a more realistic appraisal of who is the likely winner of the 2016 Presidential election.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable
First off, here's the source that article is referencing:
Dukakis Lead Widens, According to New Poll
Second off, that article is dated July and is directly referencing Dukakis' post convention bounce. You stated he was this far ahead in August. Well that's incorrect because at this point in an election convention bounces have already faded (which is the case for Hillary's post convention bounce).
Article dated July? I see August 10.
BY STEPHEN KRUISER AUGUST 10, 2016
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Not sure I agree with the map. Heard today on a conservative radio program of all places that Trump is winning Texas right now by only 6 points, and his lead there continues to decline. Hillary may very well even get Texas.