Trump Campaign Memo: Strategy Was To Provide ‘SAFE SPACE’ For Voters Called ‘Bigots’

originally posted by: burdman30ott6Time to shut the doors, hang the "No Vacancy" sign, and provide an easy exit for anyone who doesn't want to assimilate to traditional American culture.

Strange, the most traditional part of American culture from what I've seen is that of competition, and that applies to business as well as non business parts of life. Let different viewpoints compete, and the best will come out on top. Excluding others for the protection of your own world view is the most un American thing you can do.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

I figured they're financially vested enough in Hillary that they were considered outliers in buster's comment. He did say "most of the racists and bigots" not all of them, so I presumed he was talking about them as the holdouts.

The KKK guys point regarding Hilary's political triangulation, that she says what she wants just to get into office, is a well documented strategy of the Clintons. Christopher Hitchens wrote a great little book called "No One Left to Lie To: The Triangulations of William Jefferson Clinton" about this very strategy, rendering Bill's presidency, and now Hillary's candidacy, a racket by definition.

a reply to: Aazadan

It isn't protection of a world view, it's protection of this country. Feel free to push the idea that protecting America is "Un-American," though... war is peace... freedom is slavery... I'm from the government and I'm here to help you...

a reply to: burdman30ott6

It just comes across to me like you don't want to compete over who can do the job best or cheapest, or even who can build the best social structure.

a reply to: Aazadan

"Best social structure"

LMAO

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: buster2010

Actually no, strength is our greatest strength.

That slogan lacks logic, sense, reason and frankly gave me a chuckle, it belongs in political comedy.

Economic and military strength win every time. All the rest of this crap is stuff we can afford to worry about when our economic and military strength is booming (here's a hint: Neither is looking too strong over the past 10 years.)

Right now we have the strongest and healthiest economy in the world...that's just the facts

Ditto Military...By several orders of magnitude..

And yes..Diversity has ALWAYS been our greatest strength...Still is...An Alloy (mixing metals - melting pot) is stronger than steel.

But I can certainly see if you were scared of different color people and all...The orange menaces idiotic sales pitch of wannabe Tyrant and "Law and Order" might sell...actually no...still don't get it...the guy is just walking dumpster fire of a human being whatever your politics.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What does any of that have to do with my post? Are you sure you meant to reply to me? All I did was respond to your assertion that "shipping jobs overseas" is a progressive policy.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Aazadan

It isn't protection of a world view, it's protection of this country.

Please don't speak for me or the rest of America that can't wait for the Sh&^ Show that is the Trump campaign to be over.

You have made it clear what your definition of this country is...and so has Trump...and America is not buying...

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
I think it is a good thing for white America to stand up

a reply to: Indigo5

We will see if America "is buying" come November, won't wee?

a reply to: Indigo5

My impression is usually that Aazadan sides with SJW type threads and arguments.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Indigo5

We will see if America "is buying" come November, won't wee?

Not enough closet racists or invisible voters to do anything for Trump.

It's going to continue to tumble for him after he panics and skips the debates..as he is already positioning himself to do..

He is a coward..like all Tyrants.

a reply to: Indigo5

We will see come November, won't we?

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Aazadan

"Best social structure"

LMAO

Are you scared of your American way of life competing with the way of life of the Chinese, Mexicans, or Syrians? If you're confidant you have the best way of life, you should have no issue with them coming here, living how they want, and then seeing the superiority of how you do things.

a reply to: Aazadan

Part of competition is making it to the game in the first place. I'm perfectly fine with winning via forfeit.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
My impression is usually that Aazadan sides with SJW type threads and arguments.

Not really. I'm not exactly a liberal and I laugh at BLM/SJW shenanigans. I understand why BLM is doing what they're doing, I just don't agree with them. SJW's (and this post is the only time I've ever used that term) are basically rebels without a cause. They just want to complain about something without actually understanding what they're complaining about (and don't get me started on the younger members of my generation who I think are brilliant academically but rather ignorant socially).

The various political compass tests I've taken mark me as almost dead center on the left/right spectrum and slightly up on being an authoritarian. This puts me a little bit to the left of our traditionally center/right government but still further to the right than what you would consider a leftist.

I can see where you get that impression though. I don't like being around guns (though I mostly stay out of those threads), I have a lot of fun making fun of Donald Trump, and I have no problem with big government so long as it's run competently (hence the authoritarian bend on my political compass). However, I don't vote for the left all that often. Bernie would have been my first Democrat vote in my life. My Presidential voting history has been 2000 W, 2004 W, 2008 Ron Paul, 2012 Gary Johnson.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Aazadan

Part of competition is making it to the game in the first place. I'm perfectly fine with winning via forfeit.

It's not a forfeit when you sabotage their method of getting to the game.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Aazadan

Part of competition is making it to the game in the first place. I'm perfectly fine with winning via forfeit.

Interesting. Do you feel this way about Americans, too? As in, are you ok with "winning" elections because of voter suppression measures?

In the sacred word of my Darth Lord Cheney, may his hunting rifle forever be loaded....


So?

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Aazadan

Part of competition is making it to the game in the first place. I'm perfectly fine with winning via forfeit.

Worked for Obama in Illinois.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Look, it was a stupid analogy to begin with. National protectionism isn't a game and, frankly, there's nothing to be gained treating it like some idiotic competition. It is simply this: Country's closed, you don't have to go home, but you can't stay here. It's that damn simple.

As far as Voter suppression goes, if it disadvantages me, I'll scream and holler about it. If it advantages me, I probably wouldn't lose any sleep over it except to say American politics tend to be a "what comes around goes around" type of ride.