It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wil Wheaton
America's first gold medal in the 2016 Olympics was won by a teenager for shooting. Because we now live inside @TheOnion.
10:36 AM - 6 Aug 2016 1,506 RETWEETS3,898 LIKES
originally posted by: MysticPearl
Liberals are idiots.
Plain and simple.
Always crying about something while pushing extreme hypocrisy they don't even see.
If Phelps himself, with his track record was Muslim, this idiot would support him carrying the flag. So it's not about actual accomplishments, it's wanting the flag bearer to be based on ethnicity or religion. Turning the Olympics into affirmative action.
And that's why few respect liberals. They disregard hard work, accountability and earning your place. They just cry when they don't get their way.
originally posted by: JAY1980
Caitlyn Jenner wasn't available?
That would have been the logical choice to prevent such an utter display of white patriarchy.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: infolurker
In short these are not the actions of liberals, a real liberal would base such a decision of who would be a flag bearer on merit, achievement and representation.
LOL!!!
Funniest thing I've heard or read all day. Muchas gracias!
originally posted by: MysticPearl
Liberals are idiots.
Plain and simple.
Always crying about something while pushing extreme hypocrisy they don't even see.
If Phelps himself, with his track record was Muslim, this idiot would support him carrying the flag. So it's not about actual accomplishments, it's wanting the flag bearer to be based on ethnicity or religion. Turning the Olympics into affirmative action.
And that's why few respect liberals. They disregard hard work, accountability and earning your place. They just cry when they don't get their way.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: s3cz0ne
I've come recently to put it as the conventional democrat types like from the last decade as being "liberals", whereas this new breed that are entirely bent on PC race baiting SJW bigotry type stuff like this CNN guy as being "progressives". It seems the "liberals" of old have been nearly exterminated, as they refuse to see plain truths / realities about Hillary (like worse than the last of the Bush worshipers), and like with the proliferation of this PC madness where not nearly as many "liberals" speak out against it as do others push / condone / keep silent about it.
originally posted by: openminded2011
a reply to: infolurker
Its both ironic and sad that anyone can negatively stereotype white males with impunity now days, but if you object, you are immediately branded racist for doing so. Do these people really believe that all white males are rich and successful? Sort of like the complaint that all black males are stereotyped as gangsters and thugs. Only idiots believe such blanket generalizations.