It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Dfairlite
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Just broke on Drudge!
It certainly appears as if Assange is suggesting Seth Rich was one of his informants.
VIDEO:
www.youtube.com...
On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich who was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.
Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.
Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”
On Tuesday Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.
Now this… Julian Assange suggested on Tuesday that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.
Via Mike Cernovich: Was Seth Rich, the source of #DNCleaks, murdered? t.co... — Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) August 10, 2016
Julian Assange seems to suggests on Dutch television program Nieuwsuur that Seth Rich was the source for the Wikileaks-exposed DNC emails and was murdered.
Julian Assange: Whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material and often very significant risks.
As a 27 year-old, works for the DNC, was shot in the back, murdered just a few weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington.
Reporter: That was just a robbery, I believe. Wasn’t it?
Julian Assange: No. There’s no finding. So… I’m suggesting that our sources take risks.
HOLY SH*T!
www.thegatewaypundit.com...
Don't expect anyone (national media) to actually report on this. It is counter to their narrative.
I DID see it reported briefly on FOX this morning.
originally posted by: vor78
a reply to: Dfairlite
It was on their F&F morning show maybe an hour and a half ago or so.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
In order to engage in voter suppression, it is important to be very accurate in knowing which voters to suppress. The best possible way to compile such a list is to vet two or more separate databases against each other. Sanders had one, Clinton had two and the DNC had a third. We may never know the truth about the third because of a recent removal of a key potential witness from this mortal coil.
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?
lawnewz.com...
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can anyone tie Huma to Seth Rich?
...Or Seth Rich to Marc Rich?
Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?
lawnewz.com...
Probably to stay alive.
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?
lawnewz.com...
Probably to stay alive.
True. Immunity won't protect you from the grave.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
He invoked the 5th 125 times.
What was the point of even showing up?
lawnewz.com...
Probably to stay alive.
True. Immunity won't protect you from the grave.
It does, however, make you high profile enough so suicide by four bullets to the back of the head looks too suspicious.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode
Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.
At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode
Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.
At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.
Please site her sense of diplomacy. I'm curious.
We came, we saw, he died, hahahahahahahaha.
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: LifeMode
Both Clinton and Trump are a danger to the nation and themselves. Trump is in more danger as he has nearly got shot at his own campaign, what do you think will happen if he gets elected? his election will get more westerners killed due to his xenophobia and his dumbassedry could get him and his followers killed.
At least Clinton has some sense of diplomacy; Trump is as diplomatic as a fart in an elevator.
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: In4ormant
those are only the ones we know about.
Then there are the ones that knew about the others we dont, which joined that unkown list.
Whatever became of Bryan Pagliano, the tech guy who set up Clinton's server? He had immunity and was going to testify. Then....nothing.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can anyone tie Huma to Seth Rich?
...Or Seth Rich to Marc Rich?
Seth Rich Huma Abedin Google search...
Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe.
They do this with a lot of conspiracies in Europe.
Maybe you'll have better luck in the States with a Google search.
Your access to this site has been limited Your access to this service has been temporarily limited.
Please try again in a few minutes. (HTTP response code 503) Reason: Access from your area has been temporarily limited for security reasons Important note for site admins: If you are the administrator of this website note that your access has been limited because you broke one of the Wordfence firewall rules. The reason your access was limited is: "Access from your area has been temporarily limited for security reasons". If this is a false positive, meaning that your access to your own site has been limited incorrectly, then you will need to regain access to your site, go to the Wordfence "options" page, go to the section for Rate Limiting Rules and disable the rule that caused you to be blocked. For example, if you were blocked because it was detected that you are a fake Google crawler, then disable the rule that blocks fake google crawlers. Or if you were blocked because you were accessing your site too quickly, then increase the number of accesses allowed per minute. If you're still having trouble, then simply disable the Wordfence firewall and you will still benefit from the other security features that Wordfence provides. If you are a site administrator and have been accidentally locked out, please enter your email in the box below and click "Send". If the email address you enter belongs to a known site administrator or someone set to receive Wordfence alerts, we will send you an email to help you regain access. Please read this FAQ entry if this does not work.