It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: BlueAjah
...
Not to mention that I (or anyone who managed) would probably get put on the same list Rich was on; I'm sure I'm on enough lists already, don't want to be added to one that ends my life.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: jadedANDcynical
I wonder how a wikileaks would pay you?? bitcoins or in some digital currency way??
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: smurfy
Not only that, but it seems he was beaten before being shot. He was conscious and breathing when he was found, and yet was unable to make any kind of report on his attackers?
He was reportedly talking to his girlfriend at the time the incident took place. It happened around 4:20 A.M. local time, which is a very strange hour for someone to be out and about.
In the related thread regarding the lawsuit filed against Edison Media Research Inc., there is a connection illustrated to that firm and the death of a republican IT person also related to voter fraud.
Rich himself has multiple ties to the Clintons through former employers, and he was scheduled to begin working directly for the DNC in the near future.
I'm not sure if the local police are equipped to investigate where this might lead.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: BlueAjah
You know, this makes me wonder if they have some bit of unreleased information that only needs a complimenting part to complete a picture.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
Ecuador has been under tremendous pressure to stop protecting Assange in recent days.
The DNC wants him silenced. He must have something big.
This gives even more validity to the theory of a whistle blower. Someone knew something wrong was going on and intended to leak the information for a reason. A normal hack might reveal damning information, but a purposeful leak would have been done because there IS something damaging to be known - for certain.