It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ou're making the case that hybrids are amongst us and that the abduction experience is veridical to the reports. The technology of the proposed aliens allows them to appear in homes without leaving any traces. Abductees say they get 'floated' into the rooms aboard the 'spaceships.' You say yourself they can cross 'the species gap.' All of this and you don't find it curious how the purported scars are/were resulting from operations less advanced than our own techniques?
I've looked at all sides whereas you *appear* to have selected Hopkins/Jacobs as the only truth-speakers and relegated all others as mistaken, wrong or 'ignoring' the issue. I say *appear* not to be rude, just basing it on first impressions.
It is useful, I think, to observe that the most intense demand for alternative explanations tends to come from those who are either unfamiliar with the rich complexity of the abduction phenomenon itself, or from those who are so wedded to a world view in which the idea of an intelligence or beings from outside of the earth visiting us is simply not possible, that they find unacceptable the idea that such experiences might actually be occurring. These individuals might believe in the existence of a personal God or a supreme being, yet not find possible the notion that cosmic entities such as these might enter our physical and mental world. What some of these critics may not realize is that frequently abduction experiencers have already been subjected to intense investigations of their abduction-related symptoms by physicians and various mental health professionals seeking a variety of neurophysiological and/or psychological and emotional explanations, sometimes with frustrating and even damaging effects (see, for example, the cases of Scott, Sheila, and Paul in this book).
Most of the pioneer abductee Researchers past and present ...did not disclose ALL of the pertinent details their associates gave to them during interviews.....
As an expriencer I can tell you that the ONLY PLACE we will find the truths and proofs everyone wants and demands is within the THOUSANDS of FULL AND COMPLETE abductee witness accounts the fields PIONEERS AMMASSED AND SEQUESTERED BEHIND CLIENT DOCTOR AND OTHER PRIVACY DYNAMICS and which I know have been overseen by a hidden hand.
My final comment on this thread is this............the ORCHESTRATED WAY which the testimonies about abductees who are shown CATACLYSMIC EVENTS ON EARTH are white-washed is SCARY......because EVERYONE makes it "seem like" there is no patterning evidenced by this facet .....when this is a KEYSTONE CAUSALITY OR PART OF MANY ABDUCTIONS.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: one4all
Most of the pioneer abductee Researchers past and present ...did not disclose ALL of the pertinent details their associates gave to them during interviews.....
Hopkins' Intruders Foundation had a policy of withholding details. They did it for ostensibly sensible reasons like being able to cross-check people's accounts without them being primed. A number of regressions resulted in snippets of details about symbols; these were sketched out under hypnosis or Hopkins would draw them like a police sketch artist.
What Hopkins hoped for was to find recurring symbols from different people. If he'd made these symbols public, they would have leaked into the abductee/experiencer community and then be open to being faked or appearing in regressions from the sub-conscious.
As an expriencer I can tell you that the ONLY PLACE we will find the truths and proofs everyone wants and demands is within the THOUSANDS of FULL AND COMPLETE abductee witness accounts the fields PIONEERS AMMASSED AND SEQUESTERED BEHIND CLIENT DOCTOR AND OTHER PRIVACY DYNAMICS and which I know have been overseen by a hidden hand.
Yeah I think there's at two issues at work here. Like you say 'privacy dynamics' is a big one with all the abduction researchers trying to, at least, keep back people's identities and not broadcast their regression tapes. Another big factor is ufologists have always been OCD collectors and amass huge piles of reports that they keep within a select group. I'd say it's been that way until maybe the past five years. Nowadays it's becoming disseminated/shared because its lost it's intrinsic value - ufology is dying out.
My final comment on this thread is this............the ORCHESTRATED WAY which the testimonies about abductees who are shown CATACLYSMIC EVENTS ON EARTH are white-washed is SCARY......because EVERYONE makes it "seem like" there is no patterning evidenced by this facet .....when this is a KEYSTONE CAUSALITY OR PART OF MANY ABDUCTIONS.
These have been talked about by a lot of people. Dozens of different scenarios for a doomed planet. Warnings and catastrophes. The exact same warnings are also described by people who get involved in channeling 'aliens' or 'spirits.' The Contactees were regular reporters of doom and we can go further back to the Spiritualist Movement of the late 19th Century too. They reported several end-of-the-world scenarios too.
I'd say Dolores Cannon crossed over and covered the channeling side of things as well as the regressions. She reported the same reports of doom and her aliens were more like spiritual entities - The Custodians. Hers were usually more optimistic and philosophical like Mack's. John Velez and Will Bueche were similar with a strong spiritual component mixed in with snapshots of catastrophic events. These are all deeply spiritual people with Canon having had a strongly religious upbringing.
From what I've read and heard, people have been receiving messages of catastrophe and world's end for decades. So far, without fail, every prediction has been shown to have been wrong. It makes me wonder why these supposed 'aliens' can seek to change the future by warning us about it and won't provide something as simple as a cure for hayfever. A tangible, real intelligence should be able to provide something real and tangible instead of empty promises. It doesn't make sense imo.