Creation v Evolution argument can end

originally posted by: Raggedyman
How in any way shape or form does your comment provide empirical evidence, why comment with nothing
I don't see the point

It doesn't, I'm just pointing out the contradiction in you saying that you don't want to waste your time by wasting your time on threads like this.

If what is being sold as the truth is the truth, then I would like to see the empirical evidence, it's very simple
Show the evidence or admit it doesn't exist, it's an easy end

What is not easy is you accepting what is offered as empirical evidence which makes this all a waste of time.

a reply to: Phantom423

I want empirical evidence that humans evolved from space dirt and space water

You can't, so don't pretend

Just say yes or no

Simple Yes or No,

Can you prove space dirt and. Space water evolved into humans

Just say
Yes or No

It can't be any simpler than that can it

Simple yes or no, answeR the question

Guys come on....
Best thing to do is just not respond.
He has shown himself up for all to see let it lie.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Phantom423

Refer to the opening post phantom
It's not hard to understand

Just wasting my time arnt you, why not highlight the part about micro evolution, deflection, sleight of hand, scared?
Rhetorical question

Is this your opening post:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Raggedyman

Do you agree to the definition of empirical evidence as stated in my previous post?

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Raggedyman
How in any way shape or form does your comment provide empirical evidence, why comment with nothing
I don't see the point

It doesn't, I'm just pointing out the contradiction in you saying that you don't want to waste your time by wasting your time on threads like this.

If what is being sold as the truth is the truth, then I would like to see the empirical evidence, it's very simple
Show the evidence or admit it doesn't exist, it's an easy end

What is not easy is you accepting what is offered as empirical evidence which makes this all a waste of time.

So,dask, you answer the question

Simple yes or no
Can you prove mankind evolved from space dirt and space water

Simple yes or no

Answer the question, yes or no

Simple, easy, two choices
Yes or No

Why are you guys even dignifying this? Circles and circles, people. You cant tell me this is entertaining you. There is nothing left to do in this thread except let it die.

a reply to: Phantom423

Answer my question
Simple yes or no

Can you prove with science, will you, humanity arose from space dirt and space water

Answer the question
Yes or no

Simple
Yes or No

I have turned the table with your question
It's on you and your science
Answer the question, or just go hide phantom

I like your line of questioning, simple to the point
Yes or no, then proof

a reply to: TzarChasm

You have the answer, go ahead
Can you prove evolution to mankind from space dirt and water, yes or no

Answer the question, yes or no

Why, they can't back out, if they back out it proves they have nothing, no evidence, everyone will see their argument is impotent
They can attack me, strawman, fallacy, assumption, but they can't back out.
They have invested to much, talked to tough, now they will look impotent if they walk,away

They have all backed themselves into a corner

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: TzarChasm

You have the answer, go ahead
Can you prove evolution to mankind from space dirt and water, yes or no

Answer the question, yes or no

Yap yap, little guy.

a reply to: Raggedyman

I've answered it before. My answer is no.

Makes no difference to me and I don't see how that benefits you in any way.

a reply to: daskakik

My apologies for pressing the matter
Thanks for being honest

a reply to: Raggedyman

Just as I predicted. You didn't shred anything. You aren't going to find a documented case of a dog turning into a cat. You just are being willfully ignorant as something like that would debunk evolution.

a reply to: Raggedyman

Once again, do you agree with the definition of empirical evidence - which is what you asked for?

a reply to: Barcs

So you won't answer my question te humans from space dirt and water

Cool

Micro macro thing, remember

originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman

Once again, do you agree with the definition of empirical evidence - which is what you asked for?

Once again

Can you answer my question, yes or no
Space dirt and space water to humans, with evidence
Answer my question, yes or no

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman

Once again, do you agree with the definition of empirical evidence - which is what you asked for?

Once again

Can you answer my question, yes or no
Space dirt and space water to humans, with evidence
Answer my question, yes or no

You asked for empirical evidence. If you want to change the subject, then start a new thread with a different question.

Answer the question: Do you agree with the definition of empirical evidence?

a reply to: TzarChasm

Why are you guys even dignifying this? Circles and circles, people. You cant tell me this is entertaining you. There is nothing left to do in this thread except let it die.

Now that I have determined that my construct of evolution is different from Berkley et al definition, I'm rather curious to see if anyone can justify the canonical definition.

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman

Once again, do you agree with the definition of empirical evidence - which is what you asked for?

Once again

Can you answer my question, yes or no
Space dirt and space water to humans, with evidence
Answer my question, yes or no

No, because that is not evolution, that is abiogenesis.

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: TzarChasm

Why are you guys even dignifying this? Circles and circles, people. You cant tell me this is entertaining you. There is nothing left to do in this thread except let it die.

Now that I have determined that my construct of evolution is different from Berkley et al definition, I'm rather curious to see if anyone can justify the canonical definition.

There is only one definition. Accept it or get over it.