It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's not that he's arguing that 100M+ were killed in the name of Darwin's theory (I could be wrong maybe he is) It's that the worldview that Darwin proposes, that the Universe, as well as human persons, is a by-product of time+chance acting upon matter leads to an entirely subjective view of existence.
This view of the world, where there is no objective moral values and duties, no innate value given to human persons, can lead to situations(has led to situations) where 'might makes right' and governments and tyrants have executed that worldview to it's logical end. Mass genocide of valueless talking animals. In that worldview Governments take the place of the transcendent and are the arbiters of 'right' and 'wrong' which, as history has shown, can be quite detrimental to human beings on the short end of that stick. Unless there is some sort of objective code to differentiate between right and wrong, we have no business looking back on history and claiming what they did was evil or good or whatever. It just was.
originally posted by: cooperton
E = mc^2: Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.
This is the exchange rate between that which is seen and unseen - matter and energy. The fact that the speed of light is encoded into this exchange deepens the metaphysical significance of light.
Another thing too - if mass is simply densified energy, why do we base our theories on the workings of matter when it is secondary to energy? Just some thoughts.
This is the exchange rate between that which is seen and unseen - matter and energy. The fact that the speed of light is encoded into this exchange deepens the metaphysical significance of light.
Another thing too - if mass is simply densified energy, why do we base our theories on the workings of matter when it is secondary to energy? Just some thoughts.
originally posted by: micpsi
Here is astounding, revolutionary, hard, mathematical evidence for the existence of the interface between scientific facts/discoveries and the transcendental, as revealed in the mystical traditions of religions and ancient philosophy:
smphillips.8m.com...
Because the volume of evidence is encyclopaedic and entirely new, you are advised to begin your study at the start of the section Sacred Geometry and work you way towards the more advanced sections.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: Raggedyman
What's the point?
I guess it's just pointing out your unwillingness to be honest.
That's all.
originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: Raggedyman
What's the point?
I guess it's just pointing out your unwillingness to be honest.
That's all.
originally posted by: slowisfast
It's not that he's arguing that 100M+ were killed in the name of Darwin's theory (I could be wrong maybe he is)
It's that the worldview that Darwin proposes, that the Universe, as well as human persons, is a by-product of time+chance acting upon matter leads to an entirely subjective view of existence.
This view of the world, where there is no objective moral values and duties, no innate value given to human persons, can lead to situations(has led to situations) where 'might makes right' and governments and tyrants have executed that worldview to it's logical end. Mass genocide of valueless talking animals. In that worldview Governments take the place of the transcendent and are the arbiters of 'right' and 'wrong' which, as history has shown, can be quite detrimental to human beings on the short end of that stick.
Unless there is some sort of objective code to differentiate between right and wrong, we have no business looking back on history and claiming what they did was evil or good or whatever. It just was.
Look at the Amarican Indians, inhuman savages, mere animals
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Raggedyman
You accept lies told to you about religion and "evolution is fake", but dismiss butler because he might be lying?
Hypocrisy much?
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Raggedyman
You don't accept religion yet, here you are, shouting about your religion.
You're funny.
What's the next joke?
Oh, wait. "Atheists killed 100+ million people". You crack me up!
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: TzarChasm
According to some evolutionists they were not as evolved as white man, neither are colored, Asians, Indians, the Irish, Eastern Europeans etcetera
It's not my belief, I am a Christian, for me we all have two common ancestors, we are all from the same paternal parentage, human, created, but you know I believe that
That's our argument
li·bel
ˈlībəl/
noun
1.
LAW
a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation; a written defamation.
Oh I am terrified tar, absolutely terrified, I won't ever come back here to ats because of my fear
You win by default
I have libeled someone, some atheists, oh woe is me
What shall I become, destined to wander poor, penniless, the wastelands forever, in my XA coupe and trusty dog eating cans of dog food and battling outlanders for the meat sniff of guzzoline