Trump doesn't understand why we can't use nuke

This will make even more people vote for Trump.

The thoughts of enemies shaking in their boots with Trump at the helm is very appealing, not like wimpy do nothing lines in the sand and fake reset buttons.

Nobody wants to nuke anything, is a joke, why nuke when more money can be made selling arms to rebels to keep the fight going.

What a joke, people still believe that any body wants the middle east struggles to be over, big interest do not wants their money train to be stopped and that includes all the countries that are involved behind the scenes.

a reply to: TheRedneck

I am not convinced the story is true, but if it is true, the concerning thing to me is that he did not instead ask the question "what would the ramifications be if .. ".

But then again, perhaps that was exactly, what he did ask; why exactly is it; what WOULD the consequence of the use of a tactical nuke be?

That of course would be a relevant question and could easily be twisted to / construed as "he just did not understand the concept of MAD".

The source should come forward or shut up.
I would prefer the come forward-option.

originally posted by: Gothmog
Want to clarify ? What types of Nukes ? Battlefield , Tactical , Strategic ? What amount of yield ? At what barometric pressure ? How deployed ? Terrain ? Altitude ?
So , do you have the expertise whether or not you could use nukes ? Didnt think so.

Fire everything!


At any rate, I'd like to hear from something more than an "unnamed source".

a reply to: DupontDeux

That's sorta what I was thinking... Instead of "why can't we use nukes," "why can't we say we might use nukes?"

At least he understands strength...

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Mizzijr
Since Clinton's “nomination,”its really starting to look like Trump is a plant to actually make Hillary win.

That is what the Media wants you to believe,and you are playing right into it.

I saw hyperbole and no answer being given. Hyperbole by the woman and man newscasters in the video, and the speaker saying that it is alleged Donald Trump asked 'three' times.

Just maybe he was never answered ? And had to ask time and again. It doesn't say, but I suspect he never did get an answer........ or he would likely have responded to the answer ....

a reply to: Gothmog

Do you really think he knows if there's a difference?.
And there isn't you know. A difference like you want to imply. Nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons.

a reply to: Gothmog

The experts like the generals? Cuz Trumps already told us he knows more than them.

a reply to: stosh64

Lather rinse repeat.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Gothmog

The experts like the generals? Cuz Trumps already told us he knows more than them.

Since assuming the Presidency, Obama has indeed fired approximately 260 senior command officers. Source

I think any new recruit knows more than the current Obama Military Commanders. For example, a Memorandum for Record, dated September 20, 2015 and signed by the former Secretary of the Army, John McHugh states "Commanders and soldiers will balance lactation support and readiness" and "“Soldiers who are breastfeeding or expressing milk remain eligible for field training and mobility exercises.” Source

Female soldier on the battlefield., "I can't reload. I have to stop and 'express' milk."

a reply to: shooterbrody

But experts none the less and quite able to recognize a chronic condition when they see it.

originally posted by: lordcomac
Wasn't there some sort of truth-in-media act that was supposed to keep the news from telling lies?

This is like some anonymous person calling in and saying they saw clintons eating a baby, and they put it on the air as a fact.

Like Andrew Napolitano getting on FOX News and saying his sources close to the investigation say FBI has enough evidence to send Hillary to jail.

.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: TheAmazingYeti

Another great example of a Hillary Campaign story.

"sources" say.

Like the speculation, innuendo garbage you just posted?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Mizzijr
its really starting to look like Trump is a plant to actually make Hillary win.

****I interrupt everyone's Faux Newz induced delusions to bring you the following***

Geez.

The funny thing is, Clinton doesn't need Trump to win.

The shrinking, disillusioned and irrational "right" have done it all to themselves.

As I predicted years ago, the right is now falling apart due to their schizophrenic nature. Their belief in some invisible boogey man coming for their guns and bibles... LOL.

Proof? They are running a reality TV show personality who has mental issues. That's all the proof anyone needs that the GOP has lost their minds (what little was left of it). YOU KNOW what they say? ---- Birds of a feather....

The Dems could run a cardboard box, and said cardboard box would still defeat anyone on the right. Because America* as a whole (*Those who aren't brainwashed by Faux Newz) recognize the insanity that Chump represents. And not only that, we are just about done fixing the mess that Shrub left. No way would they throw all that away by electing Chump.
Some just have a hard time facing reality.

A lot of Chump supporters have a nasty habit of calling themselves, and thinking of themselves as "Patriots". Nothing gives me a bigger chuckle. One couldn't find a more un-american platform than that of Mr. Bankruptcy himself, Donald Chump. His platform is more in-line with Nazi Germany than ANYTHING american.

I can hear the "patriots" now. Chanting for the deportation of millions of people. For the destruction of America to elect a reality TV personality. USA USA USA... Please.

Maybe you guys will get it together and run someone sane in 2020-2024. But I doubt it.

Hillary will KEEP America great. Not turn it into a hate-filled KKK/White supremacist's wet dream.

Living in reality is so nice. Too bad the Chump supporters can not ever experience it.

Perhaps that's why they have so much inherent anger inside of them towards people they perceive as "different"??? Think I might be on to something.. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA.

I now return you to your Faux News induced delusions...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: shooterbrody

But experts none the less and quite able to recognize a chronic condition when they see it.

By selected video clips?
You are full of crap.
Any doctor who would "diagnose" or discuss a potential diagnosis made only on selected video clips is as full of crap as you are.
Hope your day at work is going well.

originally posted by: Sillyolme

originally posted by: lordcomac
Wasn't there some sort of truth-in-media act that was supposed to keep the news from telling lies?

This is like some anonymous person calling in and saying they saw clintons eating a baby, and they put it on the air as a fact.

Like Andrew Napolitano getting on FOX News and saying his sources close to the investigation say FBI has enough evidence to send Hillary to jail.

Comey himself said there was evidence

there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information

And that others have been punished for similar crimes

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences.

You are full of it today

Talking about using nukes and using them are 2 different universes. What Trump is doing is posturing.... building his image as a strong leader. North Korea does this all the time.

You people think Trump is such a buffoon, when he actually just speaks in broad strokes so that the (idiots) public in all countries will clearly understand his positions. If you think there are no intricacies to Trump's though process, your own thought process is suspect in my book.