Hillary Takes Huge Lead in new Poll

originally posted by: olaru12
I know polls don't mean anything....

But this one coming from the GOP mouthpiece, Fox news, must be a bit disconcerting to the Trump campaign.

insider.foxnews.com...

Are you aware fox is in Hillarys corner?? There editor even donated to her campaign he's a democrat. The days of fox being on the right are over where have you been??

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: SudoNim

You read my mind 😄

That was awesome.

Really so basically calling anyone who dont support CLinton a RETARD,STUPID,UN EDUCATED is OK right? Isnt that against the TnC to attack fellow ATS members even in a off handed way?

originally posted by: olaru12
I know polls don't mean anything....

But this one coming from the GOP mouthpiece, Fox news, must be a bit disconcerting to the Trump campaign.

insider.foxnews.com...

FOX news is now DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED OPINON FACTORY.

a reply to: SudoNim

You actually just described Democrats.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: olaru12
I know polls don't mean anything....

But this one coming from the GOP mouthpiece, Fox news, must be a bit disconcerting to the Trump campaign.

insider.foxnews.com...

FOX news is now DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED OPINON FACTORY.

I thought they were "fair and Balanced"



I would like to see some supporting evidence that Fox is now democrat controlled.

I'm listening to Fox AM now waiting for Rush, still seems far Right to me, almost exclusively supporting Trump and doing a fine job of bashing Clinton.

a reply to: olaru12

Dragon riders post mentions it. WHy dont you look up the new owners yourself though. When their old owner was forced out A democrat took over. SO you may laugh but its now UNFAIR and UNBALANCED.

Also CONTROLLED OPPOSISTION HAs to appear to be Un biased.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: SudoNim

You read my mind 😄

That was awesome.

Really so basically calling anyone who dont support CLinton a RETARD,STUPID,UN EDUCATED is OK right? Isnt that against the TnC to attack fellow ATS members even in a off handed way?

I agree with the overall assessment.

I'm not individualizing it, you are.

The original post says "largely" & "usual".

It does not say all.

a reply to: Annee

SO was the guy you agreed with. It was worded intentionally that way. Its wrong when republicans insult democratic posters too of course.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Annee

SO was the guy you agreed with. It was worded intentionally that way. Its wrong when republicans insult democratic posters too of course.

I went back and read it. I know what it says.

It says "largely" and "usual".

Again, I do agree with his assessment of the "largely and "usual" supporters of each candidate.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Annee

SO was the guy you agreed with. It was worded intentionally that way. Its wrong when republicans insult democratic posters too of course.

I went back and read it. I know what it says.

It says "largely" and "usual".

Again, I do agree with his assessment of the "largely and "usual" supporters of each candidate.

I didnt dispute that is how you understand it. Notice he worded it that way to Skirt the TnC.

Hillary's lead will evaporate after her big economic speech tomorrow, and taxpayers start to realize how they're going to be screwed.

Hillary's lead will evaporate after her big economic speech tomorrow, and taxpayers start to realize how they're going to be screwed.

Hillary's lead will evaporate after her big economic speech tomorrow, and taxpayers start to realize how they're going to be screwed.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Annee

SO was the guy you agreed with. It was worded intentionally that way. Its wrong when republicans insult democratic posters too of course.

I went back and read it. I know what it says.

It says "largely" and "usual".

Again, I do agree with his assessment of the "largely and "usual" supporters of each candidate.

I didn't dispute that is how you understand it. Notice he worded it that way to Skirt the TnC.

I think if you read my other posts and could saw the amount of warnings I get i'm not someone who goes out of their way to "skirt the TnC".

I said how I feel, clearly if you feel like it was insulting to you then you identified with the generalisation I portrayed in my question.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: SudoNim

You actually just described Democrats.

Did I?

So HIllary has more supporters at rallies than Trump?

Which one is it? You can't have both.

Maybe you want to re-think your one-liner.

a reply to: SudoNim

Generalizing whole groups of people is very low brow by the way. But thats nothing new.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: SudoNim

Generalizing whole groups of people is very low brow by the way. But thats nothing new.

Is that a generalization of people who generalize people?

a reply to: SudoNim

I said how I feel, clearly if you feel like it was insulting to you then you identified with the generalisation I portrayed in my question.