Hours After First Intelligence Briefing, Trump Likely Leaked CLASSIFIED Secrets (Rumored)

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Crap now we need to know how you think instead of you making things clear from the beginning.

Your op was misleading, you edited to try to salvage, it deserve to be hoax binned in my humble opinion.

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: JinMI

Retraction

This story was reported based on information from several sources. Upon further review, those sources seem to have come from a single source with unverifiable information. There is no evidence at this time that Donald Trump has received any intelligence briefings before making his comments on Friday

reverbpress.com...

/thread

How does your saying go Lucidity? "and people flagged this? SMH" How did I do?

I quote that in my OP, dude. Pay attention. Also pay attention to the theme and the other words. Reading comprehension is your friend. Nice try though.

Which version? I can't keep up with your liquid OP. The heading either. Troll thread achieved.

It was in the ORIGINAL. Right up top.

Oh ok, thanks for clarifying. You knew it was a troll thread then. Please, by all means, continue.

No, not a troll thread. Just a developing story thread. And guess what? Sometimes those pan out and sometimes they don't.

But for the record? I'd believe this about Trump in a heartbeat if I didn't have a brain because I view him as a petulant, barely semi-literate man child. And there's not a doubt in my mind that he couldn't be trusted with certain information. Should he become President, he's going to have to be heavily monitored and handled. That's for damn sure.

Your the one who put it in the news category. Your the one who used the title of a retracted story to push BS. Maybe Dreams and Predictions would be a better fit.

Your opinions are not news.

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Crap now we need to know how you think instead of you making things clear from the beginning.

Your op was misleading, you edited to try to salvage, it deserve to be hoax binned in my humble opinion.

Wrong.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Yeah, be humble and start taking responsibility for your mistakes instead of attacking everybody

If you think there aren't concerns over the briefings...see two of the links in the ORIGINAL OP and also, there's this....

Partisan concern over Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton handling classified information has created a public debate over whether they deserve to receive briefings from intelligence officials—a tradition that dates back more 60 years. The process formally began for Clinton and Trump on Friday. But Clinton’s handling of classified information over email while she was Secretary of State was characterized as “extremely careless” by FBI Director James Comey earlier this month. And Trump has gained a reputation for his off-the-cuff candor, leading many to question whether he can be trusted not to reveal national security information. [Time]

I don't think either of them can be trusted entirely either, but they're the candidates. Just don't say you weren't warned. About either of them.

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Yeah, be humble and start taking responsibility for your mistakes instead of attacking everybody

Who'd I attack?

Oh..sorry...someone who missed the very first line of the ORIGINAL OP? Also, back atcha.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Ive said here before...when running, all candidates are given a largely vague security briefing..in loo of winning the nomination.

Then, the nominees (Hillary and Donny-Two-toned) are given slightly less opaque briefings because they are now in the outside loop of the inside one...and one will definitely get elected.

ONCE elected? Then the real deal comes their way, everyday. Hill C. as former SOS has some idea what deals we have with people, countries and orgs, whereas the "Donald" is gonna find out real quick if he takes office.

He wont be able to keep 80% of any "promises" he has made. Frankly...its because he can't..because of whats in those dailies...and he finally finds as POTUS...what the hell is going on around the world...and the secret deals we've made and keep whose info was not available to him...

And if this thread is any indication of how he'll treat these "EYES ONLY" dailies...we're screwed.

MS

originally posted by: ~Lucidity

originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Yeah, be humble and start taking responsibility for your mistakes instead of attacking everybody

Who'd I attack?

Oh..sorry...someone who missed the very first line of the ORIGINAL OP? Also, back atcha.

Acuracy does not seems to be your forte, it's the second paragraph...

Could not resist

originally posted by: ~Lucidity
Now, I'm not sure this happened yet as it's sort of just breaking...but just imagine.

Amid reports that some intelligence officials have deep reservations about sharing sensitive information with Trump, Clapper said that “it is not up to the administration and not up to me personally to decide on the suitability of presidential candidates.

The American electorate is deciding on the suitability of the next commander in chief.” But Clapper’s remarks came amid new signs of deep discomfort with Trump among the upper ranks of the intelligence community. In a measure of that growing animosity, one senior intelligence official said Wednesday that he would decline to participate in any session with Trump. [WaPo]

That's National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper Jr.

ETA: Also...Multiple US intelligence officials say they are wary of giving Trump 'top secret' national security briefing

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Your evidence of him having no filter is that he said something which is common knowledge?

Do you even think before you type?

So, Trump hasn't received a briefing yet but he is being accused of leaking info from a briefing. In other words, it didn't happen and somehow this is news. Future crimes, I guess. Minority Report. Yeah, let's lynch someone for something they haven't done. Sounds reasonable. This thread needs to be trashed binned.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Passive-Aggressive much?

hahahahahahahaha

I don't "want" to start a rumor that Hillary rapes small children, so I hope she can defend herself and prove that "rumor" wrong.

hahahahahahahahahahaha

I haven't seen this much "lame" since I was in a waiting room at my physical therapists.


hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

a reply to: xuenchen

King Abdul Aziz Air Base.

I find it interesting that there aren't any planes anywhere on the google earth map of that base.

originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: ~Lucidity

Your evidence of him having no filter is that he said something which is common knowledge?

Do you even think before you type?

That was a general statement that anyone who spends even a second listening to him, nevermind decades, knows in an instant. His filter's further so broken he can barely complete a complete sentence or coherent thought. That is my opinion. And I think plenty before I type. Do you?

If you hate me and my ways and the way I think and type so much just stay the hell away from me like I do from you, deal?

a reply to: ~Lucidity

This Clapper?

a reply to: ~Lucidity

I am loving how all these "high-level" security admins are fretting over what Trump might or might not do.

On the other side, these things have actually happened and resulted in nothing.

Fear vs Reality

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Well...someone has egg on their face.

Very silly attempt to smear Trump. Good thing nobody with any real sense here took it seriously.
Hoax Bin?

Have you not noticed every attempt to smear Trump of late ends with an OP with egg on their face?

The left and their media (everything minus fox) are throwing everything they can at the Donald.

a reply to: ~Lucidity

Lol.

OP got triggered after getting called on her troll attempt.