It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: schuyler
The way I see it you're not really voting for a President as much as you are voting for what effect they will have long-term. Short-term they can do very little. Look at Obama. From a policy standpoint, his are very close to Bush. Imagine that? Well, it's because he has very little choice, really. But where a President can influence generations is in his nominees to the Supreme Court. The next president may have opportunity to appoint several. The Supreme Court is currently evenly divided. If Hillary gets in she will assure that the anti-gunners get in. If Trump is elected, we're likely to get more conservative supreme court justices. I don't think Trump is a traditional conservative at all. In fact, if you analyze his stance on the issues of the day, he's pretty middle of the road, but relatively speaking, Hillary will appoint liberals. Hillary and/or Trump will be gone in a few years, but the result of the supreme court nominations will influence this country for decades.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: schuyler
A symbolic vote is the only one which can possibly be justified, given the unelectability of either of these entirely monstrous feinds.
Unless of course ones intention is to buy into the hegemony.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: schuyler
A symbolic vote is the only one which can possibly be justified, given the unelectability of either of these entirely monstrous feinds.
Unless of course ones intention is to buy into the hegemony.
originally posted by: ssenerawa
There's also a green and yellow party IMO are not power and/or money hungry, and/or corrupted
Keep seeing Hillary Clinton and Donald trump blasted everywhere over the media lies, fraud, money laundering the Clinton family probably even has a couple murders under their belt, trump is a reality tv star etc.
Then Bernie endorsing Hillary making everything he's said as a candidate void
Then DWS stepping down after the WikiLeaks then getting promoted to different position
Also Bernie was invited by Jill Stein to join the Green Party.
I would vote this woman if she happened to be a candidate somehow m.worldstarhiphop.com...
No ours are electronic and have been rigged and/or hacked in the past and probably will be this time too.
originally posted by: Spacespider
The US election is so confusing.. there are so many twist and turns, here in Denmark we just get a a list of names on a paper walk into a room and put a X with the one we want to vote for, same in US ? do the Americans just get a piece of paper with a two lines saying Trump and Hillary and one just set a X with the one you want for president ?
Ehh.. At least I'd have a clean conscious.
originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ssenerawa
I would vote this woman if she happened to be a candidate somehow m.worldstarhiphop.com...
That's Like Gambling at a Casino and Knowing before you Even Walk in the Door that you Will Never Win . Good Luck with that.....
No they aren't turn off your media for awhile.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
originally posted by: ssenerawa
There's also a green and yellow party IMO are not power and/or money hungry, and/or corrupted
Keep seeing Hillary Clinton and Donald trump blasted everywhere over the media lies, fraud, money laundering the Clinton family probably even has a couple murders under their belt, trump is a reality tv star etc.
Then Bernie endorsing Hillary making everything he's said as a candidate void
Then DWS stepping down after the WikiLeaks then getting promoted to different position
Also Bernie was invited by Jill Stein to join the Green Party.
I would vote this woman if she happened to be a candidate somehow m.worldstarhiphop.com...
Yes they are the only two options.....
I'd rather not vote if they were the last two real or practical options, sets a huge precedent for the future of America.
originally posted by: schuyler
They are the only practical options. One of them will get it. Oh, I know some people want to vote their "conscience," but if you do your vote will be only symbolic. Plus in a very close election you run the risk of allowing the candidate you least like to get in.
The way I see it you're not really voting for a President as much as you are voting for what effect they will have long-term. Short-term they can do very little. Look at Obama. From a policy standpoint, his are very close to Bush. Imagine that? Well, it's because he has very little choice, really. But where a President can influence generations is in his nominees to the Supreme Court. The next president may have opportunity to appoint several. The Supreme Court is currently evenly divided. If Hillary gets in she will assure that the anti-gunners get in. If Trump is elected, we're likely to get more conservative supreme court justices. I don't think Trump is a traditional conservative at all. In fact, if you analyze his stance on the issues of the day, he's pretty middle of the road, but relatively speaking, Hillary will appoint liberals. Hillary and/or Trump will be gone in a few years, but the result of the supreme court nominations will influence this country for decades.