The Revitalization of the Race War. A Communist Agenda.

Race wars is a weapon and tool of communists. This is a great Video pertaining to such a subject. As well put together media can be more informative than a limited-in-size-post I will leave most of the fact presenting to said video.

Hopefully more and more people have become aware of just how negative BLM actually is. Unfortunately I still see alot of support, pleas of tolerance etc.. some even on this site.

BLM is the former Hands up initative. When 3 autopsy's all determined Brown was not shot in the back (and most likely did not have his hands up) nor that he was shot executions style Hands up became BLM.

Now this is not attack on the general philosophy that black lives matter it is an attack on Black Lives Matter, Aswell as all race baiting, race mongering idiots, politicians and media. Also this is not a post on BLM put it is an important part of it.

The threat of communism played a huge part in the rights of black people as the conflicting nations fought for support of the black races. Alot of civil rights laws pertaining to blacks came into existence in the hope of placating the african-american race, The communists also spread minority-friendly material with the objective of gaining their support and trust. But it was'nt just a war of smiles and handshakes, it was also fought via deception and incitment. Communists also encouraged support to inciting racial tensions, which is excatly what the democraticly inclined MSM, Hilary clinton and Obama himself have publicly done.

Today this same exact tactic is being used. The media being the communists and as we now know (Though I am sure most of us were pretty convinced beforehand) the DMC has a very tight control of media. So we have our obvious candidates for the present day communist party whether you wish to call me tin hat or not i feel the assumption is more than justified.

The communist agenda of the Democrats being abolishment of the constitution one step at a time (Death by a thousand cuts) starting with gun control it would seem (amongst other things); Historically gun control has been used as a very effective method of population control.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I am not a supporter of politcians, government or voting; I believe the current system to be a lost cause. But I would highly insist on avoiding democratic votes. Can the republicans be trusted? Probably not but better a chance than a definate dominating power.

The DNC has broken the 1st Amendment, "of the press", and that is just the begining of a long list. I am sure the DNC chairman did not soley possess the power to manipulate and control all of the MSM, I always look to the highest powers when confronted with such crimes, powers we know won't ever be brought to justice.

This video is a good factual inlook at how you can compare the drving force of the democratic party to that of the last true communist regime. The poster also has many good subjects if he is new to you.
www.youtube.com...

The abolishment of the constitution? The Democrats are communists? According to you, that would mean Democrats are starting a race war. Next you will ask who has or ever has been, a member of the Communist party. When would youn like the congressional hearings of citizens to start?

Your thread is of the deep end.

a reply to: reldra

The Democrats control the media, the media tell lies to incite race wars, they also manipulate truths and ensure the correct people are thrown under a halo whilst the wrong people are the subjects of criticism or just ignored completely. You replied pretty fast, perhaps if you watch the video you may have a better understanding of my point of view. Perhaps not.

a reply to: WhatGoldStandard
Sure they do. Like they control FOX news and the masses of Conservative media besides that.

originally posted by: WhatGoldStandard
a reply to: reldra

The Democrats control the media, the media tell lies to incite race wars, they also manipulate truths and ensure the correct people are thrown under a halo whilst the wrong people are the subjects of criticism or just ignored completely. You replied pretty fast, perhaps if you watch the video you may have a better understanding of my point of view. Perhaps not.

I read the summary. I am not going to watch 52 minutes of him. Race problems have occurred on their own without huge media or any media, throughout history.

a reply to: reldra

A majority of race wars have arised from either religion or government(Edit: When i say government I also include ruling partys/individuals aswell, such as a king). Control and oppression. In regards to race problems happening throughout history please give me some examples, of course these examples will have to be within a time frame of Media existing, otherwise it will be pointless to this discussion.

a reply to: reldra

According to you, that would mean Democrats are starting a race war.

I really think you don't pay any attention to what's going on sometimes.

Yes they are attempting to put the foundational ideas into peoples' minds in their attempt to create homogeneity. As we've seen throughout history, forcing people into homogeneity does not work and never will. Yet if you have not bothered to learn this, you will not see the mistake being made. We can see it being made on a national level by the media. The DNC tonight had several speakers ignorantly attempt to enforce these ideals.

"You didn't build that, someone else did that for you"

Then yes, we have the racists attempting to create a divide. They want to reverse any and all progress made by society in regards to race relations. They want you to feel differently around people of a different race, and they plant this idea in our minds on a daily basis. Most of them don't even realize they are doing it, but they are being played into ignoring the corruption in order to fight back against a common enemy (their perceived oppressor)

Many, many people already have these ideologies that make way for the destruction of individual freedom and responsibility, opportunity and progress.

I like to think that most people have had these ideas but we grow, educate ourselves, and evolve our ideals. Unfortunately, many of the Democrat's voting base has not evolved their ideologies beyond that base level yet. It makes them easy to take advantage of as their false ideals are reinforced and used against them.

lol no this is pretty funny. I am confused just what race wars have communists started? Communist revolutions have always come from the working class rebelling against rich, corrupt, repressive regimes. Also you clearly have no idea what a communist is if you think either political parties with their ties to big businesses in any way shape or form resemble communism. To make things even more ridiculous you ad in large corporate media which would be destroyed in a communist regime as part of the plot. And I notice that you skipped the biggest race bait in the nation Trump. You know the guy who the KKK supports and says he is bridging America to their values. And do you really mean communists? Maybe you should look up the word and read about its history.

Authoritarian / Totalitarian organizations / movements tend to have Social Group Warfare (SGW) components central to their foundational core (i.e. Bolshevik's vs. Bourgeoisie & Nazi's vs. Jews), or are entirely based in such (i.e. SJW Anti-Patriarchy Identity Politics (which includes BLM) & NeoNazi's). Since authoritarianism is cold and cruel, and totalitarianism is outright evil, identity politics bent on rabble rousing HATE just naturally come with their territory. And oddly enough, they usually tend of have "progressivism" as they larger mantra (i.e. Nazi's "progressive" Eugenics and them being the "National Socialist" party; the Marxists/Leninists/Stalinists/China/Vietnam/North Korea/Cuba all being Communist; BLM with its clear Marxist inspirations; the SJW's taking Identity Politics beyond "over-the-rainbow" (super crazy) sophistication; etc.)

a reply to: MrSpad

Earlier I was reading up on the "Holodomer" for the first time. This, the Soviet's long history against Ukraine, along with Russia's continued aggressive / militaristic slant towards Ukraine is the same difference as a "race" war. It's actually worse, as we're born with our race, we humans that have innate tribalism, where nationalism is purely a learned mass social group concept.

The Holodomor (derived from морити голодом, "to kill by starvation"), also known as the Terror-Famine and Famine-Genocide in Ukraine, and—prior to the widespread use of the term "Holodomor," as well as currently still—referred to also as the Great Famine, was a man-made famine in the Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 that killed an estimated 2.5–7.5 million Ukrainians, with millions more counted in demographic estimates. It was part of the wider disaster, the Soviet famine of 1932–33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country.
... ...
They see the leadership under Stalin as making significant errors in planning for the industrialisation of agriculture. Dr. Michael Ellman of the University of Amsterdam argues that, in addition to deportations, internment in the Gulag camps and shootings (See: Law of Spikelets), there is evidence that Stalin used starvation as a weapon in his war against the peasantry.[87] He analyses the actions of the Soviet authorities, two of commission and one of omission: (i) exporting 1.8 million tonnes of grain during the mass starvation (enough to feed more than five million people for one year), (ii) preventing migration from famine afflicted areas (which may have cost an estimated 150,000 lives) and (iii) making no effort to secure grain assistance from abroad (which caused an estimated 1.5 million excess deaths), as well as the attitude of the Stalinist regime in 1932–33 that many of those starving to death were "counter-revolutionaries", "idlers" or "thieves" who fully deserved their fate.
...
Grain supplies were sufficient to sustain everyone if properly distributed. People died mostly of terror-starvation (excess grain exports, seizure of edibles from the starving, state refusal to provide emergency relief, bans on outmigration, and forced deportation to food-deficit locales), not poor harvests and routine administrative bungling.
en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: reldra

CPUSA likes Democrats .......

Communist Party USA Chairman: We Are The Progressive, Pro-Labor Wing Of The Democrat Party

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Great adition. I was focusing on a certain period due to spacial constrants but much appreciated. Stalin Is always a good place to start if you wish to learn about the mindset of a communist.

a reply to: reldra

Fox News has low viewership compared to the Big broadcast networks.

So who watches more propaganda?

a reply to: WhatGoldStandard

Please read what Mr. Spad has to say, just above this post.

originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: reldra

According to you, that would mean Democrats are starting a race war.

I really think you don't pay any attention to what's going on sometimes.

That was a good conclusion from whatever the OP was trying to piece together.

a reply to: xuenchen

It's also ONE network. We have some juiciness about the DNC colluding with other media outlets. It's also very freaking obvious for anyone paying attention.

Everything in the OP is wrong. Impressive.

Learn what words like "communist" mean before you post stuff like this next time.

a reply to: WhatGoldStandard

Class struggle is a component of Marxism at least, and I suppose that race could be considered a class struggle.

But in the whole "class struggle" is no more than identity politics, a wild theory that because someone is of a certain race, economic standing, or class, that all of its member share some sort of affinity with one another, have similar interests, are not an arbitrary and abstract grouping, but a "social force", a "community".

Like all identity politics, groups eventually split into sub-groups, and tribalism wins the day. In Marx's mind, class struggle ultimately leads to revolution, or in less euphemistic terms, violence.

a reply to: MrSpad

I am making comparisions to the race war during that threat of communism and relating it to the democrats today. Did i say they was trying to mimic communism in every way? No. But i stand by saying they are using the same tactics as the communists did in regards to race war.

If I had said they were exactly like communists in every way shape and form I would understand your post. I am just comparing tactics of past oppressive regimes to todays own government in America. I do the same in regards to other oppressive regimes. I am more interested in the tactical approach than the general ideology.

I said I am not republican either. I worry more about hilary than trump though. As i said my view is the system is broken

Edit: Sorry I was rushing to finish this so i could go do something I did'nt respond to the first question.

In regards to what communists did to start race wars; The communists were attempting to win the hearts of the african-american race. They put aside a large amount of money to be used in this effect. CPUSA I believe it is called were instucted to distribute propaganda to the black Americans. Black communists were also trained and then sent to spread communism to others. This resulted in a large part of the black population supporting to communist regime. They even spread rumors that AIDS was created by Americans to infect black people which lead to alot of conspiracys within the blac community and more discord (whether these rumours had validation or not I don't personally know). Most of this is in the video and as I said the media has the better platform to go into large interconnected detail whereas limited posts do not.