Julian Assange: My Next Leak Will Ensure Hillary’s Arrest

a reply to: DJW001

Thank you for that point. IMO it has not escaped people's conscience that the media and power player holds Clinton to a completely different standard than Trump. We don't know exactly why, but it may be the point that tips the scales to Clinton.

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: WilburnRoach

Seriously. I wonder if his tax returns will shed any light on his using Trump Foundation funds to settle legal disputes (pay off those suing him) and building big statues of himself, and commissioning portraits of himself (Saddam, anyone?)

His motto must be 'let them eat cake'.

Funny how WikiLeaks still hasn't leaked them. All tax returns must be filed electronically these days, which means they are very easy to hack.

originally posted by: carewemust

Julian Assange-Wiki and Guccifer were responsible for bringing to light the magnitude of Hillary's unethical dealings.

Did they? They've done nothing really but show Hillary was irresponsible with how she handled email.

If they totally clam-up at this point, that's fine. These two have served Americans well by exposing the flaws in U.S.S. Hillary. Now that she's listing badly, Donald Trump and (hopefully) Congress will finish the job by firing a few torpedoes into her stern.

Keep living the dream man, not long now till you'll come back to reality.

a reply to: mkultra11

Why does she want research for Parkinson's? For the same reason we have research on cancer, Alzheimer's, MS, and other diseases. We are looking for cures.

Approximately 60,000 Americans are diagnosed with Parkinson's disease each year, and this number does not reflect the thousands of cases that go undetected. More than 10 million people worldwide are living with Parkinson's disease.

Many people, like Clinton, don't have to experience an illness or unfavorable circumstance in order to understand results, and can empathize enough to want to help. This entire nonsense about her having Parkinson's needs to stop. Look at Michael J. Fox, and Ali. It's not really something you can hide, and she's not stupid. She wouldn't run for President with a debilitating illness.

www.pdf.org...

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Practice saying President Trump.

I don't need to practice it. Should he win, I will continue to call him "that idiot".

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: mkultra11

I always remind people I discuss this with that they have to remember that we were Notsupposed to see any of these emails and that any info on our govts corruption put in the spotlight is a good thing.

The DNC is not the government. All they have done is show that political parties play favorites; that's what "party" means.

To those against Trump, it should be appreciated bc they can do the same against Trump if he were in office.

No. It is painfully obvious they would not, otherwise there would be a massive dump of emails from Trump's lawyers. They want Trump to win, and therefore will never reveal his corruption.

Hillary serving as secretary of state is not government? A presidential nominee has nothing to do with the goverment? What fantasy country are you living in?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: mkultra11

Why would Hillary have her people do Parkinson drug research. They are hiding something from the American people.

Did you know that physical disability does not bar an individual from the presidency? Try reading the Constitution.

Then you know whats wrong? Are you sre its just physical and not neurological or mental impairment? Then why are they being dishonest to the American people? Why don't they say exactly is going on and let the American people know.

originally posted by: WilburnRoach

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Practice saying President Trump.

Can't wait till Trumps tax returns are leaked.

Practice saying President Clinton

I think she'll win. She's the status quo candidate and they usually win, so I agree with you she'll be President.

I don't think Trumps tax returns will have anything to do with it.

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: DJW001

Practice saying President Trump.

I don't need to practice it. Should he win, I will continue to call him "that idiot".

Which fits in with my theory on another thread I posted to, that social media will still be combat media after the election. This election is so polarized that no matter what side wins there will continue to be a battle.

Puppet master George Soros is helping Hillary by funding an overseas effort to get 8 million overseas US voters to vote Hillary, so I'm guessing Hillary will win. If you like foreign agents influencing our election and government, vote Hillary.

SPAM removed by admin

a reply to: infolurker

Re: "My next leak will ensure Hillary's arrest."

Oh, Julian... you are running out of time unless I missed something.

originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: infolurker

Re: "My next leak will ensure Hillary's arrest."

Oh, Julian... you are running out of time unless I missed something.

If indeed Julian Assange really said that, this was 2 or 3 "leaks" ago. I think it was one blog or publication that quoted him as making this statement?

a reply to: carewemust

Apparently, the subsequent leaks weren't enough. ?? I searched Twitter for that tweet and this is what I found.

Debate is Monday, so when is the next leak happening?

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
Debate is Monday, so when is the next leak happening?

Don't hold your breath.

The only leak we're likely to see on the 26th is Julian Assange pissing himself over his interview with the Swedish police.

a reply to: MongolianPaellaFish

Maybe he changed his mind or got cold feet after the unscheduled visitor at the embassy last month?

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: MongolianPaellaFish

Maybe he changed his mind or got cold feet after the unscheduled visitor at the embassy last month?

Some random guy tries to climb the embassy wall in what must be the most incompetent and pathetic attempt to gain unlawful entry, and Assange suddenly decides he's going soft on Clinton?

I don't think so.

originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: carewemust

Apparently, the subsequent leaks weren't enough. ?? I searched Twitter for that tweet and this is what I found.

Thanks for that link, Tweetie. I assume that's an official WikiLeaks Twitter page? (I'm not a Twitterer or a Facebooker)

If I was Assange, and wanted to help Donald Trump beat Hillary, I'd get the most damning Hillary info to Trump directly. It wouldn't be a public release. He'd be the one to release it to the public, at his discretion...Either before, during, after, a given debate.. or not at all. I would leave it up to Donald Trump's discretion.

a reply to: carewemust

Yes, that's Wikileaks page. I follow Wikileaks on Twitter so I see a lot of what is tweeted. I'm a Twitterer but not a Facebooker.

My memory may not serve but I thought Trump said at one point he had contact with Assange. I could be mistaken. That was before the intruder was discovered scaling the Ecuadorian Embassy if I'm recalling correctly.

I don't think I'm going to watch tomorrow's debate. My nerves are shot. I will certainly be thinking about it in my own way though.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: DJW001

Thank you for that point. IMO it has not escaped people's conscience that the media and power player holds Clinton to a completely different standard than Trump. We don't know exactly why, but it may be the point that tips the scales to Clinton.

She got a free pass from Comey, that is way better then a free pass from the Media.